Marc Antony In Julius Caesar Analysis

Improved Essays
Antony to Rule the Republic In William Shakespeare’s The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, leadership and the implications surrounding it are recurring themes. Shakespeare’s insights into the human condition create the political setting and mood of the play, which centers on a group of men in various leadership positions. This focus on realistic human condition depicts flawed characters. Their flaws then are unavoidable due to the flawed nature of the world. With all these faults in character, the question remains: who, if anyone, is best fit to lead? Marc Antony may seem like the less obvious choice, but his charisma, experience, and oratory skills equate him to Ronald Reagan and John F. Kennedy. His military experience and the respect gained from …show more content…
In order to maintain credibility and respect with the public, a leader must be able to arouse strong emotions by defining a vision which captivates and unites them. Marc Antony’s oratory ability helps him win over the people of Rome and gain credibility to unite them against a common enemy: the conspiracy. He knows the power of persuasion and shows this power in his speech at the funeral of Caesar. With only a short speech, Antony manages to completely shift the public opinion in his favor by convincing the Roman citizens to oppose the conspirators and condemn their murder of Caesar. “There 's not a nobler man in Rome than Antony,” one citizen says of Antony (Act III, Scene 2, line 115). Another citizen says of the conspirators, “O traitors, villains!” (Act III, Scene 2, line 196). By using his powers of persuasion in appealing to the preponderant emotionally susceptible American bourgeoisie, Antony would be gaining an overwhelming portion of the …show more content…
He has the intelligence to take advantage of Brutus’ naïve nature by convincing the conspirators of his allegiance to the conspiracy, and of his support of the murder of his friend. He takes each of their hands, and assures them, “Friends am I with you all and love you all,” (Act III, Scene 1, line 232). Antony is able to utilize his intelligence and sincerity, along with his many other traits, in ways that persuade and motivate people. During his funeral oration, Antony repeats, “But Brutus says he was ambitious; And Brutus is an honourable man,” (Act III, Scene 2, lines 85-86). Saying this shows that he is courageous in addition to his intelligent, for he openly mocks Brutus in front of the plebeians. Like Reagan, who was able to lead the nation utilizing his great oratory power, Antony’s speech over Caesar’s dead body showed that effective leadership stems from the ability to incite an audience with words, intelligence, and

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Effective Leader In William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, many qualities of leadership is portrayed. Throughout the play, men do everything in their power to obtain authority; therefore, choices and ideas begin to go beyond extremities. Effective leadership is represented through various qualities. Having self-direction is a major quality of a leader.…

    • 277 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mark Antony fosters a strong sense of emotion in his compelling speech at Julius Caesar’s funeral to the Roman people in Act III, scene ii, lines 74-147. Antony prefaces the deliverance of his speech by calling Brutus and Cassius’ honorability into consideration, but ultimately criticizes them and ignites a fire of rage within the citizens of Rome. This scene occurs shortly after the assassination of Caesar. At this point, the Roman people hold the conspirators in high regard as the narrative of the execution is characterized as being for the benefit of the city. Throughout Antony’s speech, however, public opinion shifts dramatically against the conspirators.…

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Brutus delivers a speech defending his actions, and for the moment, the crowd is on his side. However, Mark Antony, with a subtle and eloquent speech, deftly turns public opinion against the assassins by manipulating the emotions of the common people. There is method in his rhetorical speech and gestures: he reminds them of the good Caesar had done for Rome, his sympathy with the poor, and his refusal of the crown at the Lupercal, thus questioning Brutus' claim of Caesar's ambition. He shows Caesar's corpse to the crowd to have them shed tears and gain sympathy for their fallen hero; and he reads Caesar's will, in which every Roman citizen would receive money. Antony rouses the mob to drive the conspirators from Rome.…

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pathos In Julius Caesar

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Brutus on the other hand, uses only facts which doesn’t give much credibility and there is no bond between him and the crowd. Antony’s precise word choice allows him to even combine pathos and ethos in one phrase. For example, towards the end of the funeral speech, Antony says “But yesterday the word of Caesar might have stood against the world: now he lies there.” Antony appeals to the empathy of the crowd by making them feel sad about his death, especially when he says “now he lies there”. He also shows Caesar was morally good because Caesar was willing to stand against the world just for…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Antony knows that because of his use of emotion he will be able to manipulate the crowd to go against Brutus and the…

    • 725 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Antony delivered a more effective speech than Brutus by using many rhetorical devices including irony, pathos, . By making his speech emotional and manipulative, Antony convinces the people of Rome to avenge Caesar's death with him. In their speeches, both Brutus and Antony use irony to appeal to the people’s emotions and convince them of different beliefs. One example of irony in Brutus’s speech is in the lines “Who is here so vile…

    • 874 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Act III, Antony stands in front of the group of Plebeians after they have just listened to Brutus, the conspirator’s, reasonings as to why Caesar deserved his death. Mark Antony uses compelling rhetoric, to switch their mindsets, so the commoners pledge to his words instead of Brutus’s. Some may believe Brutus’s leadership skills make him a great speaker, but Mark Antony’s powerful, raw words…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    William Shakespeare is regarded as the greatest writer in the English language. He is well-known for many of his works such as Romeo and Juliet, Hamlet, A Midsummer Night’s Dream, etc. Along with these works is “The Tragedy of Julius Caesar”. In “The Tragedy of Julius Caesar”, Shakespeare writes two very well known speeches that are delivered by the characters Brutus and Mark Antony during the funeral of Julius Caesar. In speeches, Shakespeare uses ethos, pathos and logos on behalf of Mark Antony and Brutus to persuade the citizens of their own beliefs.…

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In order to avenge Caesar, Mark Antony turns a shocked, confused crowd of mourners into an angry mob of rioters by using persuasive techniques. The main component of Antony’s speech, Pathos, appealed to the commoners by striking an emotional spot inside them, trying to turn the fickle crowd against Brutus. Antony displayed the persuasive technique of Pathos by repeating words, showing them Caesar’s body, and presenting Caesar’s will. In the beginning of Antony’s speech, he spoke of Brutus as an honorable man, but in this case he repeated the word, making the connotation of honorable negative.…

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In a sarcastic tone, Antony repeatedly referred to these "honourable men". Repeating "Honourable men" is also seen to be ironic, he's ridiculing Brutus and the conspirators saying his idea of Caesar being so ambitious, he's a threat, is something to laugh about. Every time Antony cleverly pauses in his speech to let the plebeians comment, the plebeians are more spiteful toward the conspirators. As the crowd begins to favour Antony the citizens make comments like "Methinks there is much reason in his saying" which shows there change in opinion. Antony said his speech, after Brutus so Antony could adapt to what Brutus has already said and even prove it wrong.…

    • 1412 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Knowing he had to sway the crowd to believe his opinion, Antony had to discreetly show the crowd that conspirators were not heroes, but murderers. Using different forms of persuasion, Antony was able to achieve his goal of turing the sympathy to people now had for Brutus, over the Caesar once again. In order to persuade the people to not have sympathy for the Conspirators, Antony showed them Caesar’s will, repetitively said the word “honorable”, and showed them Caesar’s…

    • 1153 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Antony perfectly tailors all these elements in his speech to achieve the goal of getting the commoners on his side and against…

    • 1389 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Antony’s speech was superior and was able to convince the people to go kill the…

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Whenever he uses the words honorable, noble, or good to describe the men who murdered Caesar it is almost as though you can hear his tone of voice. Antony does not believe that a single conspirator is good. He knows this from the beginning. What he is truly implying is that the men are dishonorable Not shockingly, it takes awhile for the countrymen to catch his meaning.…

    • 1348 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In The Tragedy of Julius Caesar written by William Shakespeare, there are two speeches regarding the same topic that are presented to the public. Both Mark Antony and Brutus delivered speeches after the death of Julius Caesar, consisting of their opinion and explanation of what has happened and why, for the needs of the Roman people. Both of the speeches have a very distinct and different purpose, and appealed to different mental senses of the crowd (Ethos, Logos, and Pathos). As Mark Antony 's words were favored and followed, riots broke out and Rome was indescribably angry and upset upon the tragedy of Julius Caesar. This event foreshadowed the conclusion of the story, and set the scene for the following conflicts that reeked havoc upon Rome…

    • 1074 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays