What Is The Right To Counsel Violated

Decent Essays
In this case, the right to counsel was indeed violated. An individual acting under the direction of law enforcement agents in this type of situation would result in a direct violation of another’s 6th Amendment rights. The right to counsel also includes that a defendant has the right to a lawyer rather her or she is paid or court appointed in each phrase of the criminal proceeding, this includes from the initial arrest until the first appeal after the conviction. As our fellow classmates stated, if Nichols had contacted the FBI agents after receiving the incriminating information; Henry denied appeal would have never been reviewed.

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    On the 17th of December 1986, Olaf Dietrich arrived in Melbourne from a flight from Thailand and was charged the next day with four counts of drug trafficking. He was alleged to have swallowed 70 grams of heroin in small packets in attempt to smuggle them through customs. Olaf Dietrich was found, in his first trial, guilty by a jury of importing no less than a trafficable amount of heroin as pursuant to section 233B of the Customs Act of 1901. Dietrich at first alleged that the drugs had been planted by the police. He was found guilty of two other counts and sentenced in the Victorian County Court.…

    • 1661 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The gun was wrongfully tried for evidence in the Cook County Circuit Court. His attorney rightfully filed a motion to have the gun evidence suppressed before the trial. Wardlow and his attorney fought that the pat-down violated the fourth amendment against unreasonable search and seizure because the police had no…

    • 351 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Lord Gideon Case Summary

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages

    He argued that the trial court in Florida decision violated his rights of being appointed an attorney because he could afford one himself. “He first filled out a handwritten habeas corpus petition directly…

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Achman Case Study

    • 748 Words
    • 3 Pages

    During the search, police found things like a Uzi machine gun, a .38 caliber revolver, two stun guns, and a handcuff key, but did not find the supposedly stolen stuff. Police Officers did confiscate the weapons while in search for the stolen items and used it in court. So therefore his fourth amendment was violated. The 4th amendment states, "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. " This action performed by the police officers reminds me of the supreme court case, Mapp V. Ohio.…

    • 748 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Salinas Vs Texas Summary

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The general rule is that a witness must invoke the privilege to benefit from it and virtually everyone is acquainted with the concept, even the uneducated and the young. The court discerned that by agreeing to non-custodial pre-Miranda police interview without expressly stating his intentions of invoking his Fifth Amendment rights, the petitioner forfeited such privileges. It was an undisputed fact that the petitioner’s interview by police was voluntary and he resumed answering questions after the period of silence, further indicating he was not invoking Fifth Amendment…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Salinas was free to leave and was not giving Miranda warnings. He was than charge later for the crime and trail guilty of murder. (Alito, leranlebertyedu, 2012) Issue: Do the district attorney violate an accused offenders Fifth Amendment’s right to forced confession when evidence is used of his or her silence against them even if the evidence comes from questioning before the offender or offenders are taken into authority custody. (Alito, leranlebertyedu, 2012) Rule of Law: Fifth Amendment Law protects a person against being compelled to be a witness against himself in a criminal case such as Salinas v Texas.…

    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In the case of US vs. Gonzalez-Lopez lies many facts within the case. Some of the reliable facts is that a man named Cuauhtemoc Gonzalez-Lopez was charged with conspiracy to distribute more than 100 kilograms of marijuana. His family hired him an attorney by the name of John Fahle to represent him but Lopez had another person in mind. Lopez went ahead and hired attorney Joseph Low to represent him in the hopes of including him with Fahle or instead of. As time went on both attorneys represented Lopez but the Magistrate Judge only accepted Low’s provisional entry of appearance and allowed him to participate only if he immediately file a motion for admission pro hac vice.…

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Tywanne Aldridge Case

    • 1028 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In brief summary of the United States court case U.S of America, Appellee, v. Tywanne M. Aldridge Tywanne is the following. Tywanne Aldridge is a former Kansas University football player who was arrested and charged with two felony crimes in 2000 as a result of a reverse sting operation with the FBI (U.S Publishing Office, 2005). The first charge was conspiracy to distribute more than 500 grams of cocaine, and the second possession of a weapon in furtherance of a drug trafficking violation (U.S Publishing Office, 2005). Aldridge was arrested with his cousins Monroe Lockhart and Preston Gardenhire and his uncle Chris McFarlane (The United States District Court For The Western District Of Missouri Western Division, 2007). Before Aldridge’s trial…

    • 1028 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    These rights include the right to a fair, speedy, and public trial by a jury. It also includes the right to counsel in the case that the defendant cannot provide his or her own. The right to counsel, specifically, has been a staple of American ue process. In the hallmark case of Gideon v. Wainwright, the right to a court appointed counsel was upheld. Clarence Earl Gideon broke into a pool lounge in Florida with the intent to commit misdemeanor offenses.…

    • 1252 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Miranda Vs Arizona Essay

    • 950 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The right to remain silent is located in Fifth Amendment, and the right to have a presence of attorney is located in the Sixth Amendment of the constitution. The Supreme Court ended up ruling that it was unconstitutional to undertake the interrogation without the warning of the rights secured by the Fifth Amendment. Additionally, the court stated that they must protect the individual from the desire to self-incriminate ("Miranda v."). The court created the Miranda Warning which is as follows: "You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law.…

    • 950 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Ethical Dilemmas of Defense Attorneys Defense attorneys have to face the ethical dilemma every day of whether or not to defend their client as well as whether or not to maintain that lawyer-client privilege. The lawyer-client privilege provides a security blanket for the client. Under this privilege, the client can almost tell the lawyer just about anything in confidence and not have to worry about the possible fear of being judged or incriminating themselves. A defense attorney serves as a guide that you can basically tell all your deepest darkest secrets to. However, some of those secrets may not always be able to be kept confidential, so be careful about what secrets you share.…

    • 3179 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Moot Court Case

    • 1647 Words
    • 7 Pages

    DAVID FALLSBAUER’S RIGHTS UNDER THE FOURTH AMENDMENT WERE VIOLATED BY THE POLICE OFFICERS, BECAUSE WHEN FACED WITH AMBIGUITY REGARDING THE A THIRD PARTY’S CONSENT TO SEARCH THEY FAILED TO MAKE A FURTHER INQUIRY. BY DOING SO, THE OFFICERS VIOLATED DAVID’S RIGHT TO PRIVACY. The primary question before this Court is whether police officers must make a further inquiry when faced with an ambiguity regarding a third party’s consent to search. The Federal Circuit Courts of Appeals have taken different views when deciding the actions a police officer must take when faced with an ambiguity pertaining to third party consent. It is crucial to our society that a person’s right to privacy is protected and able to be exercised.…

    • 1647 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The question of the case against Mapps was if the evidence obtained through the search violated the Fourth Amendment and should it been allowed for criminal proceeding…

    • 1229 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Fifth Amendment

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Arizona, which ruled that the inculpatory and exculpatory evidence brought against a defendant at trial is only admissible if the defendant has been informed of his right against self-incrimination as well as his right to consult with an attorney. This Supreme Court decision was brought about by the conviction of Ernesto Miranda, who provided a confession to police without being informed of his right to counsel and his right to remain silent. The Arizona State Supreme Court upheld the conviction, but the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that because he had not been informed of his rights, his rights had not been properly upheld. The key to this decision is the distinction between an informed waiving of those rights, and an uninformed waiving of those rights. If a person is convicted based on self-incrimination, the prosecution must be able to prove that they were explicitly aware of and subsequently waived their rights.…

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Powell V. Alabama Case

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, and Eighth Amendments were established to protect the rights of the suspected, the accused, criminal defendants and that of convicted criminals. There have been several instances of the course time where these protections of rights haven’t been upheld. An example of when these protections of rights have been neglected is the Powell v. Alabama in 1932. There are several things that made this particular case so different from that of other cases. The time period, the series of events in the case, and the doctrines that were established during this time period are just a few to mention.…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays