The Two-Party System Analysis

Great Essays
With the recent election, were you unable to relate to either of the presidential candidates? Most American citizens wished that there was another candidate, capable of winning, running because both candidates were so extreme. This dilemma occurred because of the two-party system, which runs the United States. If the United States was run by a multi-party system or a system by which no parties were present then there would be a very low chance that Donald Trump would be president due to how intensely the people dislike him. With a recent poll, about 14% of America thinks that the federal government works. This high level of dissatisfaction shows that Americans are in need of a change to our current system. These Americans that participated …show more content…
Two-party system advocators mainly focus on how stable the government is when compared to multi-party systems. “The two-party system is said to promote governmental stability because a single party can win a majority in the parliament and govern.” This is true, however, it will not allow change. The United States should keep its values and ideas. However, there comes a time when change to policies is essential. With party polarization, compromise will not allow for change to fix problems. Many will also advocate that the two-party system is what the founders intended. This is not the truth because political parties are not mentioned whatsoever in the Constitution. Political parties emerged so that organizations could put their candidate in a spot where they have a higher probability of winning. American citizens should not have to choose between such opposite candidates when they would prefer a more moderate …show more content…
For example, if there are many extreme politicians that are trying to push forward a very specific path for the future of the United States, then nothing will ever be completed. It will never be completed because they will be unable to compromise due to their differing beliefs, which are opposite in everything except wanting the future of the United States to be great. The amount of time it takes to compromise will also be very high because their views are so different. Thus, creating more arguments and longer compromise periods. If there are many moderate politicians that are trying to push an agenda for the future of the country then there is a much higher chance of compromise that will come more quickly. Their ideas for the future of the country are more similar so that the compromise will be more fruitful. The time commitment to pushing forward a new policy is also a very big factor. It takes a very long time to pass a bill in today’s government because of the intensity of the arguments. However, if there were many moderate politicians then compromise would come quicker and more policies would be able to follow at a faster rate. Thus, fixing the problem, and many more to follow, more effectively than many extreme politicians passing a less fruitful policy in a longer amount of

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Zinn's Two-Party System

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Howard Zinn, a noted historian and social activist describes the American system as the “the most ingenious system of control in world history.” This system has perfected itself in manner that prevents the middle and working classes of the United States from joining together and actually challenging the system. Throughout his book, A People’s History of the United States, Zinn describes a plethora of government actions and major events that have contributed to this system. I believe that he would point to the advent of the two-party system as the event or series of events that did the most to lead us to our current situation.…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This is accomplished because a higher number of elected representatives guard against the attempts of the few, so the factions won't become the majority and the government won't disintegrate whenever there is a dispute. Having a government that could withstand factions that commonly work against public interest and infringe on the rights of others is how to make a country stand the test of time. But is this true? Our two party system is a faction within itself. I feel as if James Madison would not be approving of the two party system, since it seems like it is typically just two very different sides constantly disagreeing with one another.…

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Democratic Party and the Republican Party have changed in the past 200 years to the point where not much is accomplished in the Legislative branch. The two-party system has become a competition between the parties rather than cooperation in order to achieve the greater good for the country as a whole. In fact, in a poll from 2012, only about 14% of Americans believed that the federal government works (Darrell West). When two parties focus more on their own ambitions, the good of the country is overlooked and it leads to an unsuccessful governing body. This has been a concern since the birth of the country; the second president, John Adams, voiced his thoughts on the two-party system, “There is nothing which I dread so much as a division of the republic into two great parties, each arranged under its leader, and concerting measures in opposition to each other.…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Before the War of 1812 occurred, America experienced mainly a two-party system between the Federalists and the Democratic-Republicans. Both parties had completely different views concerning politics. The Federalist party was led by Alexander Hamilton who supported a stronger central government and a loose interpretation of the constitution. However, the Democratic-Republican party was led by Thomas Jefferson who supported state’s rights and a strict interpretation of the constitution. After the War of 1812, a one-party system developed due to the collapse of the Federalists party at the Hartford Convention in 1815.…

    • 748 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Beginning with the election of 1848, America began to see the dismantlement of the long-standing two party system as it no longer met the needs of the American people. Slavery became a central issue of upcoming presidential and congressional elections alike; people were no longer voting for the party they might have previously aligned with but rather for the party and candidate that most closely shared their views on the issue of slavery. The old party system didn’t address this issue as successfully as the nation needed, as can be seen with the Whig party, a once power political group, that quickly fell apart as slavery became more and more of a national concern. As the years progressed, and the issue of slavery became more and more polarizing,…

    • 269 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Political parties are such a key aspect to the society than the average United States citizen may think. They play an active role in our society and have been since the early days of America in the 1800’s. Looking back into history, it reveals the true functions of the political parties that play a factor into how the people of early America were impacted by them. The American government system would be nowhere if it were not due to the building of the political party groups. Many people know the political parties as two or more groups trying to fight each other for election, which is true, but they also check on the other party, influence the public, as well as inform the public about the other and any wrong doings that they commit.…

    • 1871 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Political party has long been dividing people: From the Whigs to the Tories; socialist to conservative; Left wings to the right. Government tends to have two polar sides. For George Washington’s farewell address, he wrote “Let me...warn you in the most solemn manner against the bane ful effects of the spirit of party... it serves always to distract the public councils and enfeeble the public administration.…

    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Reaching a compromise is important so that all factions have their ideals implemented. Although this often results in a status quo bias, it impedes majority and minority tyranny from developing. Government promotes compromise between the majority and minority groups. The problem of factions is solved by forcing factions to compete with each other. Fragmented democratic institutions are set­up to allow federal laws to be passed.…

    • 832 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Receding Parties In the early American history two major factors political groups share their ideas and beliefs on how this country should governed. These two parties – Republican and Democratic both believe that these decisions are, “Best for the country.” Eventually as time goes by people are beginning to start losing hope for these two parties due to the empty promises made by them, and the secret propaganda. There are more receding republican and the democratic parties, but more who claims to be independent.…

    • 357 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Personal demands are sacrificed for the greater good, with seemingly strong reason. With weak political parties, more time is spent fighting over every last issue, which allows various factions-special interest groups- to saunter in and gain political influence, contrasting the point of the Madisonian system of democracy. This, along with weak leadership, leads to the alienation of American citizens from politics. Thus, in order to maintain American participation in politics and uphold collective responsibility, one must form a political ideology and conform to a party that aligns with those ideals. This conformism allows elected officials to get more done for the people by limiting conflict within parties and upholding party discipline.…

    • 1655 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What is polarization? Throughout the course of American history, arguments occur regarding what role and function the government should play in the democratic process. Since the formation of two major political parties during the 1800s, political polarization began to impact how the government functions. According to Political Polarization in American Politics, polarization is defined as diverging from median Republican and Democratic views and increases when the political stances and ideologies move further to the left or right of the middle, central view (Hopkins and Sides 2015, 17).…

    • 1144 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Personally, I do not think that single party governments are very representative for the country but of course, it does have its advantages. Furthermore, I do conceive that the more parties the government have the better as long as it is not too…

    • 1865 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Democratic Party and the Republican Party. The founders did not consider the development of this ideological divide when they were writing the constitution. These political parties have instigated ideological separation and polarization among the nation and the people (Taylor 1996). Today nearly every level of American politics has been polarized to point where people in the middle aren’t being accurately represented (Jones 2001). Over the years research shows that each party have become increasingly stronger and more cohesive, and there for separated from each other.…

    • 1004 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    common interests. This is one of the reasons why Madison wanted more territories, more states, and more districts in the United States to prevent having a majority and separate powers. Furthermore, he did not think democracy would efficiently work in such a large country like the United States since the territory is overly large to keep all men in politics. Democracy only efficiently worked in small states because everyone was able to participate in politics such as Athena in ancient Greece.…

    • 1566 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Political Polarization “The unanswered question of American politics in this era is whether our divided political system can function in times of stress” (Ezra Klein). Our political system is comprised of two parties with opposite views on important topics. When the representatives of these parties experience more constraint to vote towards their party 's stance on issues they are less likely to compromise and therefore get less accomplished.…

    • 1188 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays