First, some restrictions should be made because “The Second Amendment is not an unlimited right to own guns”. Some should not be allowed to have guns due to mental illness. They may have mind altering issues causing bad thoughts of damage to do with guns. Some would say that the constitution grants the right for anyone to bear arms. Adding to that, the gun control article on pro-cons states, “¨The Second Amendment is not an unlimited right to own guns¨(Gun Control). Some are not mentally competent to own a gun, so the article says those ones aren 't granted the right. However, guns should be in the right hands without change to the ones that can own the guns. Lastly, this amendment was implemented for a reason shown by the article stating, “Armed citizens can help reduce crime because according to John Lott (PhD) gun laws helped reduce "homicides by 8.5%, aggravated assaults by 7%, rapes by 5%, and robberies by 3%” (Second Amendment Weebly). Guns can do good to society. Many have the fear of
First, some restrictions should be made because “The Second Amendment is not an unlimited right to own guns”. Some should not be allowed to have guns due to mental illness. They may have mind altering issues causing bad thoughts of damage to do with guns. Some would say that the constitution grants the right for anyone to bear arms. Adding to that, the gun control article on pro-cons states, “¨The Second Amendment is not an unlimited right to own guns¨(Gun Control). Some are not mentally competent to own a gun, so the article says those ones aren 't granted the right. However, guns should be in the right hands without change to the ones that can own the guns. Lastly, this amendment was implemented for a reason shown by the article stating, “Armed citizens can help reduce crime because according to John Lott (PhD) gun laws helped reduce "homicides by 8.5%, aggravated assaults by 7%, rapes by 5%, and robberies by 3%” (Second Amendment Weebly). Guns can do good to society. Many have the fear of