What Is The Persuasive Essay On Euthanasia

Improved Essays
Euthanasia should be allowed to someone who is terminally ill suffering with extreme pain. According to Dr. Philip Nitscke from CNN news on november 27th, 2013, he wrote “a peaceful death is everybody 's right” (par.16). Basically, what this foundation is saying is that everyone has the right to die and with that, at peace. I believe this statement to be factual because I agree each person should have the right to end their suffering at their own discretion. I feel it is barbarrack to force people to suffer and linger through a painful end of life when there is a peaceful, painless option available to them. Patients with terminal diagnosis should have this information presented to them so they can make an informed decision. Susan Donaldson …show more content…
In Kevorikians theory which I support, the length of life is shorter but the quality is greater. The same way that people have the right to live healthy and pain free, should also be applied when they are sick and suffering wanting to be at peace. According to the author Sheryl Grey Stolberg in the New York Times, May 11th 1999, the founder of hospice Dame Cicely Saunders talks about, "You matter because you are you. You matter to the last moment of your life, and we will do all we can, not only to help you die peacefully, but also to live until you die." This suggests that all people have the right to control their destiny and help them take the fear out of dying. I feel that hospice, a specialized type of care for those terminally ill, is a benefit to human beings because it promotes death with dignity. People with this care can maintain the highest quality of life until the moment of death. All in all a peaceful death is everybody 's right, and at the end of the day dying is not a crime if it is what the person …show more content…
Jack Lessenberry from the Los Angeles Times writes that Jack Kevorkian states “Yes, we need euthanasia, for certain cases where people are in comas or too immobile to even press a button” back in december of 1993.(last para.). This means someone 's decision to die should be based off of what they want and what is going to make them feel better. I believe if someone can barely press a button and is still suffering, they shouldn 't have to live if they do not want too. If the person is in a coma or too immobile to do daily activities, they have already died in a sense. They are not really living if they cannot perform the daily activities a person does. Aaron Foley from mlive news article, states that Jack Kevorkian also acknowledges that “ The patient decides when it 's best to go”(Para. 5). This demonstrates that making the decision to die is already hard enough without your family 's opinions and thoughts on top. To many this is tough seeing your loved ones making the decision to move on and be at peace, but they have to see things from your perspective and put themselves in your place. The person dying knows what 's in their best interest and it is only fair that people, especially loved one 's respect their decision. Suffering is not living and people can become selfish when they want their loved ones to hold on just so they don 't have to say goodbye. Michelle Mikee O.

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Right To Die

    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Should the right to die be an option for those who are terminal? There gets to be a certain point when even the toughest pain meds and strongest drugs just do not cut it. In rare cases like these, do individuals have the autonomy to make the decision to end one’s life? The right to die is a moral principle that is based on beliefs that one has the right to undergo a voluntary euthanasia. Now many would argue that the right to die only harms one’s self, or would fall under an Ulitarian attitude.…

    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    PAD is a right, not a privilege; every competent person capable of making their own decisions should have the freedom to determine the time and manner in which they expire. PAD gives us hope that if we ever become terminally ill that we will have the option to die with dignity. Terminally ill patients that are suffering, suffer from more than just physical pain. The patients, in some instances, are forced to endure their loss of independence, which jeopardizes their dignity. PAD empowers these patients with the freedom of knowing they will not have to suffer.…

    • 1715 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Euthanasia, also known as death with honor or dignity is used to help patients who are suffering from a disease that cannot be cured. When doctors see no hope of cure in a patient’s health, the treatment becomes too painful euthanasia helps, in euthanasia doctors can drug the patient suffering with lethal and put them to sleep.. It is every human’s natural right to decide whether they wish to live or die, especially in the situation where there is no hope for cure. Legalizing Euthanasia can put an end to miserable sufferings of patients in need. It is a way to reduce further treatments that do not guarantee cure and rather cause more pain to the patient.…

    • 1301 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In other cases giving the patient antibiotics, chemotherapy, or morphine may lead to their death. Voluntary euthanasia, is when the patient wishes to die. Non- voluntary euthanasia, is when the is unconscious or unable to make a decision someone appropriate makes the decision based on the patients behalf. Involuntary euthanasia is when someone who chooses life is killed anyway. The main problem is who should decide if and when Euthanasia should be carried out.…

    • 1952 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Studies show that family members who did not want there loved ones to go though with assisted suicide were left with regret after there death. It bothered the family members that the terminally ill patient did not die with there wishes in mind (Sayburn). Assisted suicide is criticized by people everywhere but it does people the family members in a way that no one that hasn’t been in the situation can…

    • 1025 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Medical professionals attending to their patients would provide the patient with either a lethal dose of medicine or a prescription for a lethal amount to do in their own time. The second type of euthanasia is passive euthanasia, or the refusal of life sustaining treatment through a spoken or written living will (Funk & Wagnalls, 2016). This is often seen when people are in a coma or vegetative state and cannot speak on their own behalf. They rely on their living will to speak for them, stating their desire to be removed from the devices keeping them alive when there is little chance for them to return to normal…

    • 1406 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Moreover, euthanasia is a form of relieving a patient from misery. Many times we often make decisions for others without actually ever being in their own shoes. This brings me to highlighting the importance of human rights and having the ability to make your own decisions. There is an on going issue where family and friends thinking they know what is in the patient’s best interest, often times leading them to a slow and painful death. It is important that patients remain the driving force when discussing their life.…

    • 1285 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Euthanasia is when the doctor gives the patient the medication, which will end the patient’s life. “Euthanasia opposers argue that if we embrace ‘the right to death with dignity’, people with incurable and debilitating illnesses will be disposed from our civilized society” (Math & Chaturvedi, 2012, p.899-902). People who are dealing with an incurable and debilitating illness are capable of making the choice to die. Especially, when there is no cure and the end results is the person will end up suffering with debilitating pain. This allows people the freedom to die in control and with dignity.…

    • 1771 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Have you gone to the important decisions of telling your loved ones that you 've decided it’s your time already? A person who would even consider physician assisted suicide has gone through this for so long that they can not handle it anymore. This is something that the person themselves have to decide for themselves, after all it’s their body so they can choice what they want to do with it. However, the down side on Physician Assisted Suicide is that doctors are not adequately trained to perform it. This meaning maybe of easing the suffering and giving the patient a peaceful death, they are doing the complete opposite and…

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    “In acute-care medicine, prolonging life is our foremost objective, and we ask people to endure considerable suffering in the interest of potential recovery and a return to a meaningful life” (Quill 106). For patients with an incurable and deadly disease or illness, asking them to stay in hospice care; therefore prolonging their pain and not allowing them to choose when they want to be done with the pain is something that must be stopped. Making physician assisted suicide legal, would allow for the patients whose palliative care options have run out, to have one final option of either escaping the pain by choosing physician assisted suicide or waiting for nature to run its course while in hospice care. For these reasons, physician assisted suicide must become…

    • 1946 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays