Legalize The Death Penalty

Superior Essays
Whenever in the country the information means register criminal acts that crash to the community for the cowardice and the intentions with which they were realized by individuals or groups constituted in enemies of the society, again the opinions proliferate in favor of the legalization of the death penalty. The countries and the communities where the capital punishment exists think that, for being the most proportional punishment with the committed damage, it is the most just sorrow. The pain, the anger, the thirst justice and: why not?, of revenge, and the intentions and consequences of these crimes are factors that prevent from foreseeing the negative scopes of its legalization, the death penalty is a senselessness that must never devote …show more content…
But it is also very likely that organized crime would hire minors as hired assassins to carry out their crimes as it is already doing it and for them, there would be the possibility of sentencing them to death. On many occasions have been checked with the passing of time the injustice that was being punished as guilty to someone whose responsibility for the offence that is imputed to him, was not investigated thoroughly. Our judicial system, as well as in countries with better legal infrastructure, is prone to make mistakes. A world-famous case will serve to illustrate this injustice, we refer to the case called "the Birmingham six". A London Court sentenced to life imprisonment six Irish, suspected members of the IRA, have exploded a bomb in a pub in Birmingham killing 21 people in 1974. Only at the beginning of 1991 the English justice acknowledged his mistake, after meticulous research.For 16 years, 3 months and 21 days that inmates were in prison suffered various kinds of torture. The case of Birmingham six is not the only mistake committed by the British court. To date has not been given with the real culprits. What amending the error would have had judges English if it had sentenced suspects to death? If in countries with a strong system of criminological and legal occur these facts, what worse would not occur on ours, that lacks a modern and efficient infrastructure …show more content…
If life is the main human right, deleting it is the first violation, and if the State who formalized the crime, aggravates the violation. When a law has no effect for which it is created, it is best not to approve

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Death penalty applies to the murders that are done savagely (kills that are done deliberately). The best approach to keep some of these brutal homicides is to utilize Death penalty more. A few individuals say that capital punishment is unfeeling, unjustifiable and it is in good. I feel that death penalty, on the off chance that it was in constrained, would be an obstacle for wrongdoing. There are numerous qualities and shortcomings encompassing the death penalty.…

    • 1690 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If someone is to commit murder people will want to see the person be punished, and most will favor and push for the death penalty. Society tries to eliminate crime and seek justice by having capital punishment, but these factors lead to wrong decision making. Once people notice the gravity of a situation they become subjective and it can cause the authorities to wrongfully accuse an innocent person of a crime. For example, if multiple children are murdered, the parents and the communities will seek authorities to find the person responsible, which they should, but it can cause the authorities to hastily accuse one of being the “cold-blooded killer.” There was a case where this happened, “the legend of Cropsey became disturbingly real with the psychopath Rand, who used to be a physical therapist at Willowbrook. From his various secret lairs, he would maneuver and plan his kidnappings and murders, such as that of Jennifer Schweiger, Holly Hughes, and Tiahese Jackson” (Elshamy).…

    • 1069 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    We are taught from an early age that two wrongs do not make a right. In that sense, when one condones capital punishment, which is murdering a being under lawful ruling for a heinous crime done, we are saying we have the right to take someone’s life. The question is, by achieving this, are we less guilty? Capital punishment has more flaws than the justice it has to offer; it should be abolished. Capital punishment should be abolished because there are too many innocent people sentenced to death, death penalty trials are much more expensive than life imprisonment, there are botched executions, unfairness against the economically disadvantaged, and racism is present in the trials.…

    • 1982 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Certainly, Reiman’s moderate theory of retribution provides a pathway to abolishing the death penalty because many individuals that are given the death penalty are victims of an aggressive and overly reactionary criminal justice system. This is one way to argue in favor of removing the death penalty through Reiman’s argument on reactionary cycle of a “eye for an eye” mentality, which creates extreme judgments that cannot be overturned if the individual is later found to be innocent. Reiman is aware of the long tradition of the death penalty as a form of retributive justice, but he finds it impractical in terms of being an accurate judge of the intent and motives of the alleged…

    • 1458 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    One major aspect of the death penalty that works in favor of society is that it preconditions the minds of the perpetrator (Gealogo). The death penalty does act as a deterrent to crime as the person planning to, terrorize, murder, rape etc,) will think twice before carrying out major acts of violence. If the likeliness for a crime to be committed goes down because of fear of the death penalty, the only outcome is positive as it provides safety for the general public (Gealogo). This shines light upon a major drawback that would come of abolishing the death penalty, as it shows weakness and tolerance for unacceptable, violent crimes. In addition, a major weighing factor for the death penalty is justice for the victim(s) and their families (Steroff).…

    • 1648 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In Reiman’s essay the growth of civilization argues against the use of capital punishment due to pain that it involves with the practice. The pain originates from physiological torture of the punished, for the offender would have specific acknowledge of when and where their life would end. Additionally, if that time was from reason changed several times could extensively impact them physiology even more so, for furthering out their life ending punishment. That acknowledgement could have a physiological effect worse than life in prison may have been experience. When a murders commits the crime there is no punishment that can be appropriate then capital punishment.…

    • 1490 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Once they are dead its over no mulligans, so it should be difficult to make this decision. Koch has a great quote where he says; “If government functioned only when the possibility of error didn 't exist, government wouldn 't function at all.” meaning that government his flawed at all levels and should not be trusted with life. The most important replay Koch gives is does the death penalty cheapen the cost of a life. The death penalty must be seen as the ultimate punishment and not throw around. Yes Koch says if you cannot measure the cost of a human life, but murder can be a ruthless crime, but to condemn another man to death is not only costing that man his life but the emotional weight on the judge jury and the…

    • 1380 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Death Penalty Debate

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages

    I believe it is a great advantage because it can lower a great amount of people attempting murder. It intimidates future criminals from making crimes as well as performs revenge to the criminal and that shouldn 't be seen in a wrong way. There are many arguments against the death penalty, but they are usually not valid when looked deeply into the topic. It is important that all states come to an agreement and use death penalty rather than some states being legal and some not. The death penalty is useful in sentencing criminals that have committed some of the worst crimes known to society.…

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Modern Capital Punishment

    • 1058 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The proponents argue that if the law was just left to be open and allow the criminals to be treated equal then, it will be very dangerous to the public (Masur,1989). The main aim of the death penalty and capital punishment is to detain dangerous criminals so we could deter them from joining the public again and prevent them from spreading criminal offense again. While Beccaria’s stance could be said true, how do we explain criminals’ behavior after they are released? We could even go as far as saying when a person is incarcerated, they often worsen in their psychological condition. Often times those who have a record of imprisonment are praised for “serving time” and continue on in their dysfunctional behavior that in turn has a detrimental effect on society.…

    • 1058 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mencken argues against this by stating that deterring other criminals “is one of the aims of punishment, but it is surely not the only one” (464). He goes into further detail explaining that criminal punishment is really a form of elaborated revenge known as catharsis. Catharsis is an idealism by Aristotle that defines a type of revenge people yearn for that Mencken describes as “a salubrious discharge of emotions” (464). He states that the death penalty provides relief “to the immediate victims of the criminal punished, and to the general body of moral and timorous men” (464). Mencken’s argument that capital punishment is not just for deterring others, but is actually a form of catharsis, is completely agreeable.…

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics