What Is The History Of International Political Studies (IPE?

Improved Essays
The four texts that are discussed in this paper all had the same underlying theme. In the 21st century, the world has become more globalized than ever before, and with it, the fields of politics, the economy and the roles of statehood are evolving. It is now up to global political economists to figure out what consequences these changes entail. This is where the four papers either deal with different aspects of these consequences or simply disagree.
Cohen’s text is about the history of International Political Studies (IPE) and its different approaches. IPE originated from interna¬¬¬¬tional relations. As states were getting to be more interdependent, especially in the financial sector, the need for a new field of study to explain this trend
…show more content…
While he agrees that America is declining and China is rising, Wohlforth argues that Layne’s method of argument is flawed. The main gripe Wohlforth has with Layne’s essay is the severe deviation from the scientific method. He argues that many of Layne’s terms are not clearly defined, which generates ambiguity. Layne also makes many claims that are unfalsifiable, again something that goes against the scientific method. For example, he argues that on the global stage balancing powers are always on the way in the near future. This cannot be proven because the “near future” can always be extended. Layne also argues that economic growth has a causal relationship to military strength, for which there is a correlation, yet according to Wohlforth is not necessarily causal relationship. Wohlforth cites the fact that at the British Empire’s height, china had a much larger economy, yet Layne still considers the British Empire to be the sole Superpower of the time. This comes from the need to analyse more than just economics when evaluating …show more content…
As stated in the beginning of his text, a realist believes that the state and its national interests are the highest priority in keeping society away from anarchy. Therefore the state is held in very high regard, and economic activity is marked as less important. Yet in the late 20th and 21st century, power has been steadily eroding from states due to globalization, and in large part trade agreements. However, there is no guarantee that the current trend will continue. China is aggressively attempting to become a power that can rival America, and it will not be content with maintaining the US status quo. If Layne’s “Pax Americana” or exclusive American domination will indeed come to an end, international relations will decline. By consequence, military strength and national interests will once again take a higher priority, giving strength to the realist theory.
The main thing that I took away from reading these texts is that our world, politics and power are constantly changing. It is easy to assume that the current status quo is permanent because it is easy to look at how the world has changed in the past and forget that it will change as rapidly and drastically in the future as well. This is of course, a fallacy as is made clear by the fact that China is rising and soon ready to challenge America. Whether it succeeds or collapses before it can become the local hegemon, there will once

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Foreign policy is an important feature that can change the outlook a country has on the world. This very topic was a particularly controversial issue during the late 19th century and early 20th century in the United States. The public was divided and it aroused great debate among the American people. It was a question of whether to uphold imperialist ideas or to sustain an isolationist agenda. Looking back on that time, one can see the shift from expansionism to isolationism in American foreign policy over a 20 year period.…

    • 714 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    American exceptionalism can be a contributing factor leading them to want to excel even on trade. Nevertheless, trade is not about who is the winner in the game, trade is about who has a better comparative advantage. In the eyes of the world, America’s number one place is getting obscured by that of China to the point that Americans see it as a backlash. In reality China is changing so rapidly that I am afraid America will be able to keep up with China. But China’s rapid growth should not be an intimidating factor for America, and as the author stated “Stop Blaming China and India”.…

    • 330 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The US builds factories in China which gives many people an opportunity to work and helps to stabilize the economy, while China, in return, provides inexpensive products so cost of living in US can be lower. On the other hand social factors in those relations matters as well. Over the last 25 years the US are more open to accept Chinese nation. The number of tourists from China is growing same as an amount of students who are welcomed to US universities, as well as to a variety of other education and cultural programms. Lieberman (2005) said : “For the first time ever an economic and military superpower is about to emerge without war or catastrophe”.…

    • 1119 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Pros Of Constructivism

    • 2158 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The constructivist turn in IR marks a shift from the material determinants of international politics to ideational factors, such as beliefs, ideas, and norms. The two dominant theoretical schools in IR, neorealism and neoliberal institutionalism (NLI), share several key assumptions regarding the anarchic nature of the international system, states are self-interested, rational actors, driven by material interests in power/survival (neorealists) or security (NLI). In addition, neorealism and NLI both rely on a rational choice framework borrowed from microeconomics that assumes cost-benefit analysis and utility maximization as the impetus behind state’s political calculus. Although conditioned by the same assumptions, neorealists and NLI reach vastly different conclusions regarding the potential for conflict and cooperation in international politics.…

    • 2158 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He acknowledges America’s importance to the world as a prime example of a pluralist democracy and free-market economics. However Walt stresses that while Americans view U.S. power as a positive, around the world U.S. primacy notion stirs up resentment, worry, and fear. From a neorealist standpoint, the author argues this global concern over American dominance is tied to insecurities that are inevitable in a world of unequal powers. Walt states the primary issue is that America is trying to construct the world but will result in being the world the nation will face. Being a dominant power, America needs to act properly to reduce resentment.…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Thus emerging actors will seek a ‘balance of power’ within the current system. That, “balancing involves institutional strategies such as the formation of limited diplomatic coalitions or ententes to constrain the superior powers. It also involves strengthening economic ties between peers, which can possibly shift the balance of economic power against the more powerful state/s in the long term.” (Flemes, 6)…

    • 1075 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As the world becomes increasingly globalized, the success of one state depends on the wellbeing of several others. The United States continuously involves itself in world affairs in order to protect and encourage growth of the state. Over the years the United States falls to war in hopes to protect its livelihood among the international and domestic community. If one state were to fall, the United States economy and infrastructure would suffer. Throughout the book, topics address the notion of the declining influence the United States has on the world.…

    • 946 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This is because, he believes that all empires, particularly America, have a “finite lifespan” arguing that their power is in decline and emphasises that China is rising and altering the way in which international relations is being conducted as opposed to the US which no longer possesses this ability to exert influence. Furthermore, historian Ferguson supports Cox’s argument by stating that the “21st century will belong to China” which shows how influential China has become as a world power. For example, in 2007, data shows that the annual GDP growth of China was 14.2% against America’s unimpressive 1.8%, this exemplifies that China does not only possess soft power but, is now a major economic power threatening other states with such a rapid growth. On the other hand, Cox neglects to take into consideration the idea that current affairs may be beyond the control of one power (China), and as a result allows his realist nature to override his judgement, limiting his understanding of the world today. Moreover, it is essential to take into account that the rise of China’s power does not necessarily translate to the fall of America’s power.…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Decline Of America

    • 1287 Words
    • 6 Pages

    It is evident that certain historical events, such as the Great Depression, have played a major role in the decline of America. One of the ways to illustrate the decline in America is the emergence of new power countries like China. China’s rise to power has become apparent in the world. As Christopher Layne states in his article This time it’s real, “China’s great-power emergence, and the United States’ own domestic economic weaknesses, it already is withering (205). China has taken advantage of the America financial crisis.…

    • 1287 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Historians and International Relations scholars have long had a relationship that allows for interworking, while distinct differences still remain separating the two. In studying the past, a historian and an international relations scholar would take into account the past as a force that generates the questions and theories of both parties. On the other hand, there lies a difference in the way that the historian would place more emphasis on recounting history and international events for their own sake. The IR scholars would contrastingly use historical events as ways to additionally supporting or discrediting a theoretical hypothesis they have proposed. In this way, their differences in methodology and objectives can be highlighted.…

    • 1022 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Realism and the End of the Cold War by William C. Wohlforth argues that Modern realism began in a reaction to the breakdown in the post-World War One international order. Wohlforth’s main ideology is realism and states how the rise and fall of realism has taken place, but stresses that international world events cannot weaken or destroy the realist ideology. The collapse of the great power cooperation helped emerge realism to be a dominant position in international relations. The central question presented in this article looks to seek to ask, did the rapid decline and peaceful collapse of the Soviet State, along with the postwar international order, discredit the realist approach? However, Wohlforth believes that.…

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The idea that China is a competitor for the power of Asia will further portray tension between the main superpower, America, and the rising super power, China (Hurrel, A.…

    • 1375 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Theories can help simplify the complexities of international politics. Theories help create an abstract understanding and an explanation of why and how the states behave. Realism, liberalism, and constructivism all have different perspectives of how the states should operate, but not one of those theories is more accurate than the other or explains the real world problems. I organized this paper based on the most famous theories: realism,liberalism, and constructivism along with their core perceptions of the world and their criticism following regards them through other lenses.…

    • 1465 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the 19th century, some powerful European countries expanded their countries to new territories, known as "colonialism." Both colonialism and contemporary globalization can lead to inter-state relations. In this article, I will compare Colonialism and contemporary globalization. Colonialism is defined as a policy or practice of "full or partial political control over another country, its occupation of settlers and its economic exploitation". Globalization means the integration of economy, finance, trade and communication on a global scale.…

    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    World Systems Theory Essay

    • 1744 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Immanuel Wallerstein's World Systems Theory is one of the many influential theories that has shaped the social sciences in the late 20th century. First proposing the theory in his 1974 book, The Modern World System, Wallerstein sees the concept as not a theory, but as part of a larger “knowledge movement” that “[rejects] social science categories inherited from the nineteenth century”, aiming to construct a new approach to social science (Wallenstein 2013: 1). This new approach conceptualises inter-state relationships in the global economic system as part of a larger “world system” instead of unilateral or bilateral behaviours, argues that historical and contemporary events must be view over the “long term”, and emphasises the need for a multidisciplinary…

    • 1744 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays