What Is The High Cost Of The Death Penalty?

Improved Essays
Capital punishment or the death penalty is the lawful taking of a person’s life after conviction for a crime (Flanders 3).Considered a controversial matter, the divide by between those for and against the death penalty is easy to understand (Flanders 3). Executions are the greatest punishment for a crime, because there is no repeal from death. Factors such as ethical beliefs, the overall cost, and attitudes towards injustices have long wanted me the distance between interested parties.

Although isolated passages of religious scripture quote support of the death penalty, almost all religious groups in the United States regard executions as immoral (“The High Cost of the Death Penalty”). What is moral is subjective to a person’s upbringing,
…show more content…
Imagine being an innocent person, convicted of a crime you did not commit. Nobody knows the exact number people executed in the U.S. during the 20th century were that were innocent. Since 1977 more than 100 death row inmates have been released from prison after DNA and other new information reveals errors in their trials and convictions. (Dudley 11) Differences between the quality of a criminal lawyer and the variety of evidence uncovered make the possibility of mistakes in the prosecution process difficult to rule out completely. Opponents of the death penalty argue that error in the court system makes the death penalty unjustifiable. Exacerbating the issue of error is that there are often links between the "arbitrariness" of capital punishment and racial, geographical, and socioeconomic discrimination.

There are possibly several reasons to support and oppose capital punishment. It is one of the most debatable in the criminal justice system. Today, there are several pros and cons to this death penalty issues. The ethical beliefs, the overall cost, and attitudes towards injustices have varying degrees of dispute. Furthermore, the general population has a range of beliefs about capital punishment. Even these beliefs of the general population are subject to

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    There are several debatable issues that face our society today, and one of these issues is capital punishment. Also referred to as the death penalty, this issue involves the question of whether it is moral or immoral to kill humans who have been found guilty of a horrible crime, which in most cases is murder. I will defend my position that capital punishment, though immoral in most cases, can be moral in special instances by starting off with addressing the matters of retribution and justice with regards to capital punishment using Kantian and virtue ethics, respectively. Sequentially, I will highlight two objections to my position involving the issues with cost and inhumanity and innocence and offer responses. My first argument begins with…

    • 1641 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    To some it means an unfair chance to exemplify themselves in a law court to others it means an unfair chance at gaining the opportunity to become a district attorney and for others their race is more likely to determine the sentencing of death. The delinquent of racial or ethnic inequality in the criminal justice structure is one of the utmost perplexing facing American civilizations currently. A lot of the racial pressures and complications in society occur most conspicuously in eminent criminal circumstances and in the alignment of the penal and penitentiary populace on a national scale. Talking about these complications is precarious for numerous…

    • 2249 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    But a number of people are still against the death penalty for moral reasons, even though, it would bring them safety. In Stanley Marcus’s article, “Public Safety Requires the Death Penalty” Marcus questions convicted murderers about their crimes, “they had no hesitation in killing again and again because they were subject to no more severe punishment than if they were convicted of robbery - and often even less.” (New York Times Article Marcus). We need capital punishment to frighten criminals and to get rid of them when they do wrong. Clearly, these criminals have no morals about killing, so why should we risk our safety to keep them alive? The convicted killers even admitted that they had no hesitation in killing the first time and they would have no hesitation killing again.…

    • 1122 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Overall, it is inhumane, it is classist and racist, and it doesn’t fully punish the criminal. It is also extremely expensive, and has not proven to avert crime in a society like America. The system is also hypocritical. It is ironic that in order to punish killers and prove that killing is wrong, we kill them. I think that if we are going to have a punishment that is so serious and permanent such as death, then the system should be completely fair.…

    • 1220 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    According to a study conducted by the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, at least 4.1% of death row inmates are innocent (Pilkington). In the United States, there has been 156 people on death row who were determined to be innocent since 1973. There are possibly thousands of more innocent individuals who were wrongly put to death, such as Carlos Deluna, David Spence, Leo Jones, Troy Davis, Richard Masterson, and many more (Death Penalty Information Center). The government and judges rarely, if ever re-address cases of wrongly accused criminals, because they tend to focus on current cases. It is important for everyone to address these innocent individuals who were wronged, so they reach the justice that is very much needed and…

    • 1276 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nathanson’s argument is inconsistent with the value of justice, because the death penalty was imposed due to the extent of the specific crimes committed. Frankly in practice, actual death sentences are the result of…

    • 1234 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Imperfections of Capital Punishment There are many people that would agree that capital punishment is one of the most debated topics in American courts. There are large amounts of supporters for both sides on this issue. People for capital punishment would argue that it serves as deterrence and also as retribution. People against it state that the death penalty is unethical and unhuman. The use of capital punishment can cause the death of innocent people, can be treated unfair and serves as a cruel and unusable punishment.…

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, what must be looked at his how many cases that weren’t affirmed and dispirit the capital felons mental state they were put to death anyway. In these articles the scholars make perfect sense as to why they death penalty is pointless. This punishment is simply inhumane and it contradicts everything this constitutions states. In many cases the eighth amendment becomes a major factor: cruel and unusual punishment. This ac is also in violation of the right to life under the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.…

    • 1160 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In reference to capital punishment, and our current case, the death penalty would bring unhappiness only to the defendant and his family. It would bring happiness to a much larger amount of people- society in general. Capital punishment totally does away with the criminal and his ability to injure anyone else in society with his criminal activities. He cannot commit crimes while he is on death row, and certainly cannot hurt anyone else once he has been put to death. This is certainly a good…

    • 1584 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He points out that executor jobs are just as degrading and uncomfortable as any other job can be, and also makes a strong statement on how the death penalty is a way of catharsis that directly affected victims and communities get. These points are effective in favor for the death penalty. However, Mencken’s argument that death row prisoners, after running out of appeals, should not have to wait long terms of time until they are put to death is not reasonable. These murderers should be allowed to suffer alive during the long wait because of their horrible…

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays