What Is The Difference Between Hannibal And Mao's Journey

Decent Essays
There are many differences between Hannibal’s journey and Mao’s journey. Firstly, I think that Mao’s journey is more difficult because I think that in Hannibal’s time, walking is the only means of transportation at that time. While there are horses and elephants, those leverages are only for rich people. That is why most people in the past would walk everywhere. However, in Mao’s time, there are already many ways that people can travel. That is why I think that Mao’s people would have more trouble on their journey. Secondly, in terms of casualties, there are more casualties on Mao’s side than there are on Hannibal’s side. This could also prove that Mao’s journey is more difficult than Hannibal’s. Lastly, the distance of Mao’s journey is about

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Imperial Rome and Han China were two empires formed on different parts of Eurasia. Imperial Rome from 31 BCE to 476 CE included their citizens in their government by having consuls elected by patricians, who made up the senate, and assemblies dominated by plebeians. Patricians were the elite class while plebeians were the commoners. Although the citizens did participate in government Rome needed a more centralized form of government. Julius Caesar became the first dictator in Rome and centralized the military and politics.…

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Imperial Rome (31 B.C.E. -476 C.E.) and Han China (206 B.C.E.-220 C.E.) are likely the two most well known empires of the time period Because of their large size and influence. When describing methods of political control, the two mirrored each other in many ways but, in some respects, had contradicting ideas. The methods of political control used by Imperial Rome and Han China were similar regarding their use of political theologies to justify leadership, their centrally structured government, and their use military power, but exhibited different roles of citizens in government and techniques for maintaining order in the lower class. In Imperial Rome and Han China, the leaders used political theologies to explain and justify their rise to…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Han dynasty and Roman Empire were two extremely powerful and successful empires. Each had useful government systems that differed from each other. Roads were also a similarity between both the Han Dynasty and Roman Empire. Also, both The Han Dynasty and the Roman Empire crashed and ended for similar reasons as well. The Han Dynasty and Roman Empire had differing government systems but were related in the fact that they each built and used road systems for trade, and their empires fell because they had the same problems.…

    • 648 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Mao mobilized the campaign in hopes of turning a country dependent on agriculture into a socialist power through rapid industrialization. Focusing on industry, Mao sought government control over the farms of the peasants. All foods were severely rationed and prices skyrocketed as a result. Heng finishes his description of the era with, “We were always hungry.” He personally recounts the young and old having “water swelling disease,” perhaps one of the many reasons for the 30 million deaths that came from the famine as a direct result of the Great Leap Forward.…

    • 1438 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Han Dynasty and Rome may seem like they have nothing in common, but what happens when these two giant empires are compared? While the specifics of the history of the Roman Empire and Han Dynasty are different, there are some similarities in the creation, maintenance, culture and decline of these two empires. The best way to compare these two empires is to start with their origins. The Han Dynasty and Romans both achieved massive success during their reigns, but their origins show the magnitude of their rise.…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are many similarities and differences in the methods used to control politics between the Han China Empire and the Imperial Rome Empire during the Classical period. Han China started 206 B.C.E. and ended in 220 C.E. and Imperial Rome lasted from 31 B.C.E. to 476 C.E., and both had advanced social and political systems. Even though both empires had gone through many difficulties and severe changes, Imperial Rome Empire still kept many political and social aspects from the Roman Republic, and Han China from the Qin Dynasty. The Han China empire and Imperial Rome empire had governments that were heavily engaged in economic activity, so they can be able to build a strong social and political order, and to have control over their populations…

    • 654 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On the other hand, the fact that Rome was first governed by patricians while China was governed by emperors set the two regions apart. The belief systems of the Han Dynasty and the Roman Empire were alike in same ways and different in others. The patriarchy in both…

    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rome (750 BC – AD 500) and China (350 BC – AD 600) experienced conflicts not only in the physical sense, such as in wars, but also in political struggles, religion, and power. Although each civilization had similarities, like structured governments in the form of emperors and dynasties, they also had differences, like in the way they wrote laws and dealt with handing out those rules. The following paper will discuss the conflicts in which Rome and China faced and how they were dealt with similarly and differently. Politics in ancient Rome and China were very complicated. Most communities usually had a single ruler.…

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Stalin infamously consisted his rule over the Soviet Union through communism, brisk industrialization, propaganda and censorship, and mass killings of anyone who conspired against. Mao, correspondingly, enforced communistic views, quickly sanctioned collectivisation and industrial growth, manipulated his people into complying with his modifications to the law with disinformation, and forming groups to kill resistance to his position of the…

    • 1360 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “More people, Mao though, would mean more workers, and more workers would mean a stronger China.” He wanted to create an industrial China, so he created a movement called “The Great Leap Forward” forcing people to abandon farming, this made China faced food shortages. “A devastating famine killed an estimated 30 million people.” After this, Mao realized that it wasn’t a good idea to encourage the population…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In group 4, there were 5 people in group and we discussed about dangerous journeys in the history article. Some persons shared their opinions frankly but others might not feel confident to tell us. It might be hard to speak English immediately without vocabulary or understanding the topic for someone in our group. However, we explained to somebody who did not understand what the main idea and concept in the article is. In class, we concluded that The Long March of Mao Zedong was more dangerous than The Journey of Hannibal because people who set off with Mao Zedong suffered from their defeat.…

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rather than a “great leap forward”, at the end of this period, China had actually taken a “great leap backwards”. While this is an event that takes place alongside a large portion of both stories, the great leap forward is better represented in the book, as Fugui and his family live in a commune in the countryside. In the movie, Fugui and his family live in an urban…

    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mao and Stalin were both horrific, but strategic communist leaders. During their time as leaders, they showed other countries who was in control and showed their people the power of communism. China was not ready for anything when Mao came to power. The USSR had their share of suffering, especially after the World Wars. Although Mao and Stalin lived during different times and in different countries, they share similarities in their leadership and policies, they had their differences in how they handled power, and between the two, Mao is by far the worst to date.…

    • 1546 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    China and Rome both structure their societies very similarly through their military, social structure, and religions. And while these civilizations were great, when their empires fell, their falls were from the same source of problems. These civilizations also had differences through how they first started expanding, how the people they conquered assimilated, what their empire were influenced by, and what happened to China and Rome after their falls. A major similarity between China and Rome was their dependence on their military force, and how they were both extremely brutal.…

    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mao on the other hand, didn't have a group like the Gestapo to hunt down and eliminate someone who opposed his viewpoint, instead Mao launched a program known as, The Hundred Flowers movement. This movement was targeted at the intellectuals of the Chinese Community, he wanted them to step forward and speak up on any criticisms they had about the government under Mao. Nonetheless, when they spoke up he took them away to camps to be “reeducated”, in order to follow the government Mao has created. Yet another difference, due to the fact that Hitler was a fascist leader was that he was an extreme nationalist. He wanted everyone to know how great the Aryan race was, and how great anything that came from their country was.…

    • 978 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays