Michael Parker-Pearson’s interpretation of Stonehenge is that it is a home for the ancestors. He believes that Stonehenge was built by a chiefdom comprised of thousands of individuals. Although these people are farmers, it is suggested that they brought supplies with them during times of gathering. The chiefdom would travel to Stonehenge to honour their ancestors on the summer solstice to see the sun rise. This was a time when they would thank their ancestors for their prosperity and fertility. Parker-Pearson believes that at other times of the year, the land around Stonehenge was not to be entered as it was sacred. After the sunrise ceremony, they would then walk down to the River Avon. As they walked along the river, they would scatter the cremated remains of the deceased into the river which was symbolic of their loved ones travelling into the afterlife. By sundown, they would congregate at Woodhenge which is considered a ceremonial home for the living. After the sunset ceremony, there …show more content…
This also furthers the connection between the two henges. Further evidence for the sunset ceremonies is found in the large amount of animal bones found Woodhenge. Parker-Pearson believes that the excessive amount of bones is indicative of celebratory feasts.
Lastly, Parker-Pearson has interpreted the ditches surrounding Stonehenge as a method of marking sacred ground. He hypothesizes that these ditches were made to ensure that people did not trespass. He associates this with a fear of the ancestors who gave them prosperity and fertility but could also take these things away. Parker-Pearson supports this by highlighting that there are no settlements near the “sacred ground” which meant that it was not a place for the