What Is Nietzsche Strongly Opposes The Socratic Way Of Thinking

Great Essays
Friedrich Nietzsche strongly opposes the Socratic way of thinking. Socrates wanted to eliminate all remnants of myth and tragedy in modern culture and replace it with an age of reason where the theoretical man has the most power. The theoretical man wishes to reveal all of the world’s secrets before him because he is following Socrates’ belief that “knowledge is virtue”. Nietzsche opposes this idea for two reasons: the elimination of myth and tragedy from the world will make us unfulfilled as a society, and the theoretical man will never be truly satisfied and will suffer from depression for his entire life.
The theoretical man finds pleasure in the discovery of new things. According to Nietzsche, “The theoretical man enjoys and finds satisfaction
…show more content…
He says that the illusion that thought has the power “not only of knowing being but even of correcting it … accompanies science as an instinct and leads science again and again to its limits at which it must turn into art--which is really the aim of this mechanism” (BT, §15, 95-96). Nietzsche sees Socratic science as a wasted effort. Nicholas Burbules, a professor at the University of Illinois, writes about Nietzsche’s problem with scientific thinking. According to Burbules, Nietzsche’s problem with the followers of Socrates is that they assume that there is more value to knowing than not knowing (1). They assume that our society can only advance once we can understand the world through a truly objective lens (Burbules 1). The theoretical man believes that only through ultimate knowledge can our suffering end; but, as already mentioned, Nietzsche sees the quest for ultimate knowledge as one of disappointment and depression. Instead of through science, Nietzsche believes that the advancement of society can only be achieved through myth and fulfilling one’s innermost desires. He disagrees with the belief that the world is fully intelligible, and thinks that those who believe this are only denying themselves of their body’s true needs. In addition, Nietzsche despises the theoretical man’s beliefs because they deny the existence of …show more content…
The theoretical man desires power, which according to Socrates can only be obtained through knowledge. In Nietzsche’s view, the theoretical man is a coward because he lacks the courage to figure out what would be fulfilling to him and instead pursues a fantasy in which he is already powerful and thus fulfilled. This is the kind of fantasy that drives men to become dictators who falsely promise their people that by following them, the world will be a much better place for everyone. Nietzsche fears the world that is ruled by dictators because it represents anti-progress. Socrates wanted to create a form of thinking that was based on reality instead of belief, and he wanted to enforce this way of thinking on his people by forcing them to be obedient to a philosopher king. This idea of an all-powerful ruler that forces his people to follow a certain way of thinking is no different than the dictators that Nietzsche so deeply feared would destroy humanity. Nietzsche praises the artist because he is obedient only to his own inspirations and is therefore allowing himself to grow into a better human being. On the other hand, those who follow the theoretical man are weak and cowardly because they would rather be obedient to a dictator than to make sense of their own needs and try to live based on those

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Nietzsche believed in the concept of infinity in more ways than just infinity’s existence. He seemed to suggest a living person’s life was not the only one lived by that person’s self; an individual’s life was the recurrence of his/her own self from a previous life ad infinitum. In this way, Nietzsche provided arguments against the prevalent Christian beliefs on the origin of the earth. One method he used, was utilizing ever evolving scientific theory as foundations and premises for his arguments against Christian teachings about the creation of the earth. Additionally, he used this method in an attempt to counter what he considered was the ultimate technique of slavery Christianity instilled upon mankind: its mortality.…

    • 1254 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Philosophers are often criticized for their ideas because people in the society we live In are afraid of change. Aristotle is a human who did nothing to harm people but spread his philosophy about the “true” and “corrupt” government, as he believed that his philosophy would provide the “best opportunity to lead a good life.” (Atkinson 43) His ideas ridiculed, Aristotle tried to teach people that citizens under a defective government will become interested with the pursuits of a ruler, but not the pursuits of a ruling class. Aristotle founded a school of his own, where people would learn and ponder about a true form of government, but the world we live in has pushed aside the ideas of what Aristotle believed was a corrupt government.…

    • 308 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In conclusion, I will present the concise summary of what I wrote in this essay. Friedrich Nietzsche was a German specialist and philosopher that was conceived in the mid-nineteenth century. His book, Beyond Good and Evil was one of the last books he composed, during the time of 1886 to…

    • 952 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nietzsche’s idea of conforming to moral laws and essentially putting aside personal motives of self-interest and pity. As well as, dealing with things in a way that shows wisdom. That also demonstrates a sensible rather than a practical idea of what can be achieved. Involving the theory of a subject regarding real-world consequences, because of one’s own behavior. Especially obeying the…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “From where in the human head did logic arise? Certainly from the illogical, whose domain must originally have been tremendous.” (Guignon/Pereboom, pp. 136). In the first sentences of Nietzsche’s aphorism “source of the logical” Nietzsche establishes his original style of writing as he introduces the topic of discussion. The commencement has a sort of elegance to it mainly due to the contradictory connotations implied. Nietzsche’s unique way of writing leaves plenty of room for personal interpretations and, as a result, a few key concepts arise. Is Nietzsche referencing an evolutionary perspective? Stating that the logical part of the brain developed through natural selection out of a large illogical part.…

    • 1034 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Republic of Plato, by Allan Bloom shows the relationship of the philosopher to the political community. In the book there is no clear plot line, just a series of questions followed by more detailed answers. Throughout the book, readers learn about the benefits that a person and a society can gain when thinking about good over self interest. “Socrates was one of the most exemplary and strangest Greek philosophers”, according to History.com. Plato found an interest in Socrates.…

    • 1081 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When A Five Year Old Asks Why Have you ever met a kid who asked why to literally every answer given to them? In Plato’s Apology, Socrates attempted to defend the charges against him through cross examination and as he proposed his defense he concluded that an unexamined life is not worth living. While Socrates faced a death sentence, he continued to do so without fear of death, unlike Ivan Ilych in The Death of Ivan Ilych written by Leo Tolstoy. Although Ivan lived a life in which he held a high reputation and made plenty money, I believe that Socrates would deem his life as an unexamined life because of his lack of self awareness and his rejection to death, causing Ivan to suffer in his final days of life.…

    • 1343 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Critique of Reason Through a Nietzschean Lens Reason has arguably been the driving force behind most popular philosophies since the peak of the Greco-Roman era thousands of years ago. The works of philosophers of reason, like Plato, who Nietzsche fervently critiques, have laid the groundwork for many of his ideological successors to proving reason to be the ultimate goal of all philosophy - a way to explain the unknown world and utilize knowledge as a means to quantify and qualify existence. Reason, no doubt, is critical to philosophical thought; however, it’s reached a point where the questions reason poses overpower intuitive and emotional philosophizing that favors a deeper understanding of oneself, one’s desires, and one’s relationship…

    • 1873 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Ancient Greeks lives center on their gods, and their daily lives consist of trying to live as piously as possible. Piety is the core moral laws during this time. To live piously is to live in harmony with the gods. It is extremely important that they must please the gods, that to act any other ways, acting impiously, is illegal and will result in punishment. Socrates is one philosopher that lives during this time.…

    • 1448 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Utopia Cicero and Plato were both great thinkers and both have a big influence on how some societies and governments are operated today. In his writing, “The Defense of Injustice”, Cicero talks about how the “justice” his society believes in is manufactured to work for self interest and not for the greater good. He uses a story where two characters Philus and Laelius argue about justice and injustice. He then goes on to talk about a single law that will never change and will be true for every nation: A law that comes from God and not following this law is sinful in any form. “The Allegory of the Cave” by Plato is similar to this in the fact that the people that gained wisdom by leaving the cave for the upper world would never look back…

    • 1055 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Introduction Socrates is one of those individuals who helped in shaping the cultural and intellectual development of the world. From the reading of “Apology and Allegory of Cave” one can best understand him for his Socratic method of question and answer. He claimed to be ignorant and that the unexamined life is not wealth living for the human race. Whereas the Good Brahim story is an appropriate expression in defense of the low philosopher. Looking at Socrates’ attitude about philosophy, it can be notice that he denied having any kind of specialized knowledge, and at a point, he made an assertion that an unexamined life is not worth living.…

    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The podcast deals with the dialogue “Plato’s Republic” written around 400 BC, which discusses the meaning of justice and what it truly means to be just. Firstly, a background in ancient Greece’s politics was offered, speaking of the appeals and brutal regimes of government prior to democracy being restored. The major issue addressed in the podcast is the execution of Socrates by the majority of Athens for the corruption of youth in and the introduction of gods that the Greeks did not once believe in.…

    • 1929 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is only through the action of forgetting that man comes to believe these truths. The “truths” that we have today exist because they are what have been repeated throughout history. The solid concepts that make up human “truths” use science as their foundational unit. Nietzsche goes to conclude his paper by stating we as humans use manmade concepts to fit our environment and to interact with others in that sense. I also believe that Nietzsche is arguing his perspective that truth does not exist in reality and that the “truth” we know is a lie.…

    • 887 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Plato’s Socrates Trilogy was play about the last days of Socrates. It consists of the three parts: Phaedo, The Apology, and Crito, in which they document each part of the trial, including his defense, the verdict of the jury, and the judgment of court. The story that I wanted to focus my essay is Plato’s The Apology. The overall theme I saw throughout the play, but emphasized in The Apology was wisdom. The theme of wisdom is also present in the novel’s visual depiction: Socrates by Robert Rossellini.…

    • 1069 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Dating back to the early days of Greek philosophy, Aristotle respectfully awaiting the death of his teacher before teaching his own viewpoints to the masses. In doing so, Aristotle not only gained respect from his peers, but allowed the people of the time to have a general understanding of Plato before Aristotle came in with a philosophy that may have been deemed radical at the time. Nietzsche came in to aggressive and his ideas were too different and extreme to be considered logically by his peers and those studying philosophy. However, Nietzsche followed partly in Aristotle’s footsteps in his recognition of change needing to occur and being willing to put himself on the line for other viewpoints to be…

    • 1633 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays