Moral Psychology

Improved Essays
Implementing thought experiments in Cognitive Science implicates imagining a situation and analyzing the outcome. These experiments assist in evaluating the study of moral psychology. Peoples’ emotions can be uncontrollable when reacting to a particular situation regarding morality. These specific situations give us space to analyze into the mentality or moral appraising. How these moral appraisal “reaction occurs”, will be further looked upon throughout this essay.
Moral situation is a conflict that ensues in people’s lives when they have to decide between two or more engagements that are perceived as right or wrong. One example that will be further examined is the notion of moral situations and how is occurs. One concept we will focus on
…show more content…
Since the participants would only be killing one person as a replacement for of five, some perceived this as the notion of utilitarianism “the greater good for the greatest number,” in this case saving five people instead of focusing on the individual. While, other participants stated that having any involvement, would connect them to someone’s death and therefore, “getting their hands dirty.” Regardless to how the decisions where rationalized, both resulted in death of one or multiple people. This leaves the participants with the encounter of internal moral conflict; using utilitarianism to rationalize whether one death while saving five is moral, or allowing a group of five people to die, to not have an impact on the individuals life is moral. When answering this moral dilemma, there was much conflict in how people felt it should be dealt with (Shenhav &Greene, 2012 and Kamm, 2015).
Stanovich imposes that moral appraisal involves two systems: the TASS and the analytical system (Stanovich, 2004). These two systems are part of the dual process theory, where there are two separate cognitive systems within the brain for cognitive decision making and implementing. The TASS is an evolutionary, quick and automatic based processing system found within people. Whereas the analytical system is an advanced higher order but lengthy and explicitly controlled cognitive processing system. (Stanovich,

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    They presented participants with a moral dilemma about saving the life of one person versus saving the life of five people during a train accident. The researchers found that the control group choose to save the life, or lives, of whichever group had a higher emotional salience compared to the other (Koeings et al. 2007). For example, if the emotional salience of the one person’s life outweighed the salience of the five lives, healthy controls would save the one person and vice versa.…

    • 1412 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Keeping this in mind, moral judgments are comparable to judgment of taste. Physical distaste can elicit the thought that something is morally wrong. The study replicated in this experiment, Eskine et al. (2011) tested this idea by investigating whether the…

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Black Coffee Drinkers

    • 1909 Words
    • 8 Pages

    This research also implies that one could have different moral judgements based on whether what they consumed is bitter, neutral, or sweet, so it proposes the idea that moral judgements are not dynamic within or even between individuals, they can change simply based on the taste in their mouth. Perhaps one could conclude that moral judgements should not be taken as seriously in society as they are now, because of their reliability on sensory and perceptual inputs and the ability for them to possibly change with various taste conditions, leading to people possibly judging others less for their moral judgements since they have a better understanding of the nature of where or how the moral judgements can come to…

    • 1909 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After analyzing the Footbridge and Trolley Problem, it is clear that there are variations in what people deem right and wrong, and this sense of moral reasoning is in part, because of emotions. Because our brain handles emotional responses quickly and intuitively, our emotions are more likely related to our interpretations of morality; that is, we are more likely to let our emotions – our guilt, our happiness – determine what we feel is appropriate for a given situation. This is supported by the idea that in the event that our brain could not produce emotions appropriately, a scenario, for example, where an innocent person was killed to save the lives of others, would not raise much concern at all (Sunstein). Therefore, if we consider how emotions…

    • 216 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The movie “Do the right thing”, directed by Spike Lee in 1989 is devoted to the topic of racism and violent actions which are caused by this phenomenon. Although the director puts a lot of stress on the cross cultural relations in the city of New York, the plot also gives us an impression about gender relations and family issues and other spheres of human life. Therefore, the movie has a lot of aspects to analyze in terms of the social psychology. In this work we will track the concepts which can be examined through this movie and relate the scenes of “Do the right thing” to the information from the book “The Social…

    • 115 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Individuals hold distinct values and often conclude their interpretation of the world is true and right. It is this complex fusion of values and beliefs that lead to ethical dilemmas. Newman and Pollnitz (2005, page 108) describe ethics as what we perceive to be the right course of action, what we…

    • 1986 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the last Chapter, Rachels discusses the creation of a "Satisfactory Moral Theory”, in this paper I will discuss my own creation of the Satisfactory Moral Theory. The moral theories are supposed to help us decide what are the right and wrong actions, but, not all the moral theories are perfect. We may feel that a certain conclusion to a problem is fair or unfair, but what theory do we use to make judgments?. I will start with the cultural relativism theory, to understand different cultures, There is a need to know that one community’s beliefs and practices are not usually the same as the other community. In fact, cultural relativism seems the most applicable approach to be taken on for communications purposes.…

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    She states, “[i]dentity theory helps identify the internal dynamics of individuals as moral persons by apprehending their self-views, behavior, and emotions within and across situations” (Stets). Stets tells the…

    • 2082 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Even though people have this common intuition about morality, people frequently create moral judgements about others based on factors that are not within their control. For example, Driver A and Driver B are both driving down a road. Driver A momentarily takes their eyes off of the road and runs a red light as a child is crossing the street. Driver A slams on the breaks and tries anything to not hit the child;…

    • 1558 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The study was carried out also to prove that a child’s ability to make moral judgements develops in a predictable way during childhood. Identify the theoretical proposition or hypothesis on which…

    • 906 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his 2005 paper “Ethics and Intuitions,” Peter Singer seeks to find a new role for intuitions in moral theorizing in light of studies by Jonathan Haidt and Joshua Greene, which seem to cast doubt on the reliability of moral intuitions. These studies suggest that much of our moral reasoning is less based in rationalizing and more based in instinctual “gut” reactions, and that these instincts can be explained in terms of their evolutionary history. Further, Greene in particular demonstrates that these moral instincts can be manipulated in order to give contradicting reports, suggesting that moral intuitions are unreliable. Singer, noting how moral theorists have thus far been unable to give an account of morality without relying on moral intuitions,…

    • 1173 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The study was to form a theory that explained the development of moral reasoning (Cherry, n.d.). Kohlberg’s model breaks our development of morality into three levels, each of which is divided further into two…

    • 1779 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Gore and Sadler-Smith (2011) proceed to show the effects of dual-processing on intuition, and offer the theory that intuitive thinking is a much more conceptual and expansive process. The primary basis of this research was to show that while intuition plays a role in decision-making, it does not act alone. The findings show that the nature of intuition is strongly guided by individual façades of moral judgment (ingenuously, how we unconsciously act in order to produce embedded moral standards). Research argues that intuitive thinking relies heavily on emotional processing, as well as the biological anatomy of moral judgment (Gore & Sadler-Smith, 2011). The idea that self-efficacy and the belief in one’s own actions effects the ability and accuracy of individual intuitions – people with low-levels of self-efficacy are less likely to produce large amounts of intuitive thinking, and will more often choose careful analysis (Gore & Sadler-Smith, 2011).…

    • 1818 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Moral Judgement Essay

    • 1031 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Moral judgement is a process which defines what is wrong, right, ethical, unethical, moral, or immoral. Moral judgement can also be defined as an expression of preference, opinion, will and command of individuals (383). Tom Regan and Mary Midgley both discuss the importance of moral theory and their different ways one can or can’t answer moral questions. Tom Regan focuses on the relativism point of view by expressing four different ways on how not to answer moral questions. Moral relativism depends on culture, legality, religion, and historical symbolism.…

    • 1031 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Also, cognitive moral reasoning should be promoted to the students, so the students can make decisions about what is the right and wrong thing to do. 3. Into which social-cognitive domain does Ms. May’s evaluation of the students’ behaviors fall? How might this influence her opinion of the seriousness of the behaviors? Ms. May’s evaluation of the students’ behaviors falls into the conventional domain.…

    • 732 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays