What Is Machiavellianism

Great Essays
Introduction: “It is better to be feared than loved, if you cannot be both” (Machiavelli 1532 p. 58). Many have no doubt heard this quote in some form over the years but few probably have examined what the quote really means. Niccola Machiavelli, the Italian author of said quote put it something like this: fear and love are two key components in leadership. If your constituents love you or fear you they will follow you. However, he said it is better to be feared than loved because it is easier to produce and maintain fear than to produce and maintain love. A quote from one of Machiavelli’s works The Prince reiterates a common theme “...love is preserved by the link of obligation which, owing to the baseness of men, is broken at every …show more content…
His work The Prince offers psychological ideas that go hand in hand with his political philosophy. Quotes such as, “Never attempt to win by force what can be won by deception.” (Machievelli 1532 p.37) and “…he who seeks to deceive will always find someone who will allow himself to be deceived.” (Machiavelli 1532 p.63), stress the importance of cunning and deception to achieve personal goals. It is for this reason that Machiavellianism is painted in a negative light and he is known in psychological circles as part of the “Dark Triad”(Hartely 2015). It is hard to argue with this assertion. When manipulation of people is involved it usually is done out of personal interests that are seen as better or more important than those of the people being manipulated. Yet under observation, it appears most of the rhetoric in The Prince lines up more closely with the INTJ personality type, as opposed to those of a narcissist or a sociopath. Narcissism and being a sociopath are personality disorders that produce socially negative results including a bloated ego and empathy toward others (Christie, Geis, 1970). In reading The Prince, it is hard to find evidence of avocation of either disorder as both disorders would also hinder anyone’s ability to follow Machiavelli’s doctrine. Unlike sociopaths and narcissists who are often marginal, high Machs are usually well integrated into …show more content…
INTJs are typically independent decisive thinkers driven by logic that thrive on producing and improving ideas through cunning and will. INTJs despise the status-quo believing anything can be improved or achieved with enough effort. However, INTJs are also normally arrogant, judgmental and tend to be over analytical at times (16 personalities 2017). The Prince emphasizes these values as the book outlines a philosophy going against the status-quo while doings so with INTJ-esc tactics in doings so. INTJs tend to manipulate and they are seen as charming. These are typical traits applauded by Machiavelli. They also believe that anything is possible through willpower. This idea was also supported by Machiavelli in this quote from The Prince, “Where the willingness is great, the difficulties cannot be great.” (Machiavelli 1532 p. 82). Yet, INTJs usually believe that most people are too lazy, unintelligent, or narrow minded to have high achievement. This outlook results in a rather cynical view of human nature. This thought is also supported in The Prince with the quote, “He who builds on the people, builds on the mud” (Machievelli 1532 p. 70). Hence, Machiavellianism appears to align more with the INTJ personality type than that of it’s more disordered “Dark Triad” counterparts. The Journal for Applied social Psychology agrees with

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Renaissance Man Dbq Essay

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The third topic of discussion is the personal views and beliefs of the Renaissance Man. Document 1 is an excerpt from Machiavelli’s The Prince. Machiavelli states that he believes it better to be feared than loved as a ruler, “...but it is much safer to be feared than loved when one of the two must be chosen. His reasoning behind this preference is supported when he says “Men have fewer principles in going against one who is beloved than one who is feared” because “....fear preserved you by a dread of punishment that never fails.” Machiavelli’s…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In turn, he thinks that some vices, although viewed negatively, are for the greater good of the government. For example, Machiavelli writes that reputation should be a high priority for a good prince. He advises, “Whenever it happens that some one does something extraordinary, either good or evil, in civil life, he must find such means of rewarding or punishing him which will be much talked about,” (The Prince And the Discourses, 82). Even if something bad happens, Machiavelli believes a prince should find a way to manipulate the situation by gossiping and garnering attention to improve his reputation. He makes it clear that reputation is more important than the quality of leadership.…

    • 1534 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He raises the question of whether it is better for a leader to be loved or feared by the public. He answers with the statement, “The reply is, that one ought to be both feared and loved, but as it is difficult for the two to go together, it is much safer to be feared than loved, if one of the two has to be wanting” (69). Machiavelli backs up this statement by saying that a leader who is feared can make decisions and execute orders much more effectively. He thinks a prince should be trusting to a certain degree, but should always be prepared for disaster, saying, “And the prince who has relied solely on their words, without making other preparations, is ruined…” (69). Machiavelli’s thought initially seems negative, as he lacks faith in the public to remain loyal to their prince.…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To defend his opinion, the author explained that as a result of the wicked nature of men, the prince will be guarded from their corruption. Machiavelli considers men as “ungrateful, fickle, liars and deceivers, fearful of danger and greedy for gain.” Furthermore, the following quotes “While you serve their welfare, they are all yours,...” and “But when the danger is close at hand, they turn against you.” support his statement towards the qualities of men. Humans are corrupted beings, therefore causing them to be fearful will suppress their power.…

    • 871 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Niccolò Machiavelli and Alvar Núñez Cabeza de Vaca went through different experiences that led them to have their own perspectives in human nature and create their ideals for good governance. The simple fact that Cabeza de Vaca was unfortunate enough to have a hard time throughout the expedition made him more open minded about human nature, while Machiavelli had a set idea of what human nature was and how it ties to good governance. Machiavelli's view on human nature is the same as what is a good governance a good leader and a good human being is someone who knows how to be respected and feared without being hated and how that leads to have the people the Prince governs happy and on his side. Cabeza de Vaca has a more down to earth view on human nature but that differs…

    • 2016 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although many see this as wrong, without a leader with the same views of Machiavelli, we could possible end up destroying ourselves because we think we know what is best. Tarltron explains this theoretical stance, “The view that The Prince was simply an exercise in practical political wisdom rooted in an historical theory of imitable examples can no longer be treated as indisputable.” (Tarlton) Between the two, it would seem that neither would work in today’s socially accepted rulers…

    • 1229 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Machiavelli argued that the ruler or the politicians could achieve national goals with various ways, which include both angle and evil deed. “ Therefore, a prince must not worry about the infamy of being considered cruel when it is a matter of keeping his subjects united and loyal” ,“A prince, and especially a new prince, cannot observe all those things for which men are considered good, because in order to maintain the state he must often act against his faith, against charity, against humanity, and against religion”Form these two sentence, we can clearly understand that the public virtue of Machiavelli can be realized by the evil deed. The division of two kinds of virtue doesn’t mean that Machiavelli deny the importance of private virtue. In his opinion, private virtue should play an important role within a range, like transforming man ' s ideology and cultivate good personality.…

    • 1199 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Machiavelli dives into politics with a very aggressive and pure mindset suggesting kings and princes to only worry about the end result without caring for the means of achieving it. Informing the readers that they should do anything it takes to get into and stay in power, the ends justify the means ideal. Machiavelli states that “Every one sees what you appear to be, few really know what you are, and those few dare not oppose themselves to the opinion of the many, who have the majesty of the state to defend them; and in the actions of all men, and especially of princes, which it is not prudent to challenge, one judges by the result.” essentially saying even if the means are unjust the people only see and judge you by the results. However, the “few” mentioned by him will eventually lead to a breach in society.…

    • 1637 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Niccolò Machiavelli spent a large majority of his aristocratic platform defaming the many intrinsic characteristics of human emotion and experience. He consciously ignored the essential acts of care and compassion while promoting a message of fear and hate. His teachings offered detailed instructions on the succession and maintenance of a fear-abiding society encapsulated by submission. His philosophy stated that the best interest of the general public was to irrefutably follow the rule of law. To Machiavelli, a human life could be explained as an expendable resource, awaiting its designated task to serve the ruling class.…

    • 904 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Machiavelli, however, cares little to none on human nature other than how best to understand and therefore manipulate it. He is in stark contrast to More, operating on the darker facets of society. Manipulation, deception and trickery are his speciality. Machiavelli's Prince pushes that a ruler be feared rather than…

    • 1954 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Machiavelli believes that the ruler must take things into his hands and not depend on God to help him rule. The ruler has to work and be worthy of the…

    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “The lion cannot protect himself from traps, and the fox cannot defend himself from wolves. One must therefore be a fox to recognize traps, and a lion to frighten wolves.” Machiavelli uses this analogy as an attempt to teach the masses how to embrace their human significance. Machiavelli wrote The Prince at a time where there was political unrest and confusion in Italy, which is why it can be interpreted in many different ways, such as a political satire or epilogue of his political views; however, while the content may be confusing the true meaning of The Prince is to be understood as a satire. Machiavelli is continuously sarcastic through out the course of the novel about the government standings and the changing world.…

    • 1412 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In many political philosopher’s eyes, there is a special relationship between the ideas of moral goodness and legitimate authority. Some of these political philosophers believed that the use of political power was only morally correct if it was exercised under a ruler who had virtuous morals. These rulers who had virtuous morals were then told that in order to be successful, they needed to make decisions in accordance with the standards of ethical goodness. This moralistic view of authority is what Machiavelli criticizes in his work “The Prince.” In Machiavelli’s book, “The Prince,” the readers are introduced to political values that do not necessarily give full recognition to morality or religion.…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Human nature can be described as the general feelings and behavioral traits shared by all of mankind. It is what sets us apart from other species. For example, humans are self-centered, social, manipulative, compassionate, empathetic, and have a complex language consisting of sarcasm, jokes and gossip. These are just a few items in a lengthy list of what makes a human. The idea of human nature has been in existence for a long time and has been studied and theorized by many important people such as Karl Marx, Plato, and Aristotle.…

    • 694 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In The Prince, Niccolo Machiavelli’s understanding of virtue and effective rule emphasizes the maintenance of political power and the disregard for morality, differing from the ideology of the classic political philosophers. Machiavelli’s concept of virtue is centered around the glorification of a ruler, facilitated by behavioural traits such as bravery, cleverness, deceptiveness, and ruthlessness. Effective rule requires these attributes, as the successful application of these characteristics towards the acquisition and maintenance of power will allow one to become a powerful leader. Machiavelli first explains the foundations of various principalities, such as hereditary and mixed principalities, as the maintenance of power differs…

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays