What Is Lobster Inhumane

Decent Essays
The article opens with an introduction of the annual Lobster Festival in Maine. While illustrating the extravagant events, the author also raises a question of whether we should boil lobster alive. The author suggests that the action is inhumane based on the study of lobster’s natural nerve system. He questions whether we should satisfy with our current method of killing lobster because there are more inhumane ways to do so or we should stop doing so because it is an unmoral behavior. Eventually, the author branches out the argument on whether we should associate the our daily animal-eating meal habits to cruelity, and how should we balance our desires for aesthetics and

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    The Omnivore's Dilemma: Ethos, Pathos, and Logos- An Analysis. A happy sunny farm versus a dark and bloody slaughter room. This is where most naive young children think where their meat comes from versus the reality.…

    • 1141 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The only way to approach the touchy topic is through the use of a casual argument. The essay is officially a non-professional correspondent report of a Lobster Festival for the magazine “Gourmet”. The readers are not expecting a moral quandary, so the argument is framed in a friendly tabloidish shell. When…

    • 231 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    David Foster Wallace’s article seems to not only be slightly outlandish but also hypocritical to me. He says within the article that he himself eats animals, which in turn means that an animal had to have been harmed in the process which he so easily compares to a “medieval torture-fest.” Within the same page of the article, Wallace calls exactly what he is doing himself “selfishly convenient.” I have a hard time understanding why he went to such great lengths bashing the Maine Lobster Festival and everyone at home who tortures lobsters for the sake of a pleasurable meal when he in turn is doing the equivalent. Whether or not he physically kills or witnesses the killing of the animal he’s consuming, doesn’t necessarily mean it had lived a full…

    • 372 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This writer loves to eat different foods and enjoys experiencing the cultural tradition of each morsel as it excites my palette. For this discussion, I will share two of my favorites; lobster with drawn butter and gumbo. My family proudly declares they are from the south and cook with precision and care of a five-star chef. Part of the rich culinary tradition is our family gumbo recipe. My family origins are from South Carolina and Louisiana, and the combination of the regions can make a mouth water.…

    • 329 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In “Consider the Lobster,” published in Gourmet magazine in 2004, David Foster Wallace, an American novelist, essayist, and college professor, addresses the ethical considerations that revolve around the annual Maine Lobster Festival- eating lobster. This festival attracts tourist from all over the country to enjoy live music, beauty pageants, cooking competitions, and of course lobster (236). The easiest way to prepare lobster is boiling it in a kettle, and an important detail of this process is to keep them alive from when they are caught till when they are cooked (242). At the MLF, they have the “World’s Largest Lobster Cooker” to complete this task (243). While attendees are having a joyous time, over 25,000 pounds of lobsters are boiled…

    • 306 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Payton White Professor Hunsaker 3 September 2016 Articles 26 & 27 After analyzing article 26, “Puppies, Pigs, and People: Eating Meat and Marginal Cases” by Alastair Norcross, a couple things become apparent. Such as (only use “such as” if you are continuing the sentence, but not to start a new sentence.) our author opening up his piece with a fictional scenario that seems a tad bit crazy, but serves as a very serious philosophical point. According to our ( it would be best to just say, “the” author instead of “our” author.) author, Norcross sees meat-eaters-at least those who know of the treatment of factory-farmed animals-are completely at fault for the consumption of meat.…

    • 1262 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He captures the emotional state of an amateur dumpster diver: “Every grain of rice seems to be a maggot. Everything seems to stink. He can wipe the egg yolk off the found can, but he cannot erase the stigma of eating garbage out of his mind” (145). Readers cringe at his vivid and effective language, imagining the dive into the dumpster, and then envisioning the effects that one might experience after. Eighner speaks of the ever-present fear that something he is eating is contaminated, knowing that there are people who purposely contaminate food; he tells of a pizza shop that put jalapeños on all of their pizzas hoping to discourage him from taking those discarded from their dumpster (144).…

    • 1081 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Cannibalism in general reflects one’s lack of humanity as willingly eating another human being equates the human into only being food and nothing else. The victim’s experiences, hopes, and dreams mean nothing anymore, their new purpose being something to fill the stomach of a savage. Stranded with no food in a mountain blizzard, some people in real life were forced to commit cannibalism to survive, but they “felt guilty about consuming their...comrades… [and] were not keen on eating flesh” (Cochran 25). This intense guilt and self-awareness of the atrocities they’re committing are completely lost to the cannibals in The Road.…

    • 1617 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Michael Pollan’s “An Animal’s Place” Pollan provides an argument on whether or not Americans should consume animals, and specifically, if the fashion in which animals are farmed and slaughtered respects their capacity to suffer. Pollan illustrates his personal dilemma particularly when he ironically points his debate on whether or not to eat meat began while he was dining at a steakhouse. To develop his argument, Pollan initially exclusively uses the citation of animal rights activists, but then gradually cites experts that support his conclusion that Americans eat animals as long as the principle behind it is correct, and animals are treated with respect. He asserts to accomplish respecting animals that Americans need to regain their contact…

    • 1386 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    An Animal's Place All beings are aware of animal slaughter for food purposes. One may either look away with guilt and still consume meat knowing in fact the process within animal slaughter, or on the crontary, not consume meat at all. Michael Pollan makes several points throughout his journal from “ The New York Times Magazine”, in which he advocates the idea of equality, factory farming, and humane farming. Within his several points, he arrives to a conclusion in which he proclaims that animals’ rights may still be honored during the preparation of the slaughtering of an animal. Equality is one point Pollan shares with his readers, stating that there is not much equality among animals themselves.…

    • 1162 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In All Animals Are Equal, the philosopher Peter Singer argues that we should extend the basic principle of equality to non-human animals. In order to justify this claim, the author examines the foundations of the basic principle of equality, establishing a moral system that takes into account the equal consideration of interests of living beings. Peter Singer states that in order for a being to have interests at all, one must take into account the capacity of suffering and enjoyment, or in other words, sentience. Throughout this chapter, Singer makes his readers see that if one rejects racism and sexism, one must also reject the idea of giving special consideration to the interests of one species over another one. In this essay, I will firstly reconstruct the arguments used by Singer to arrive at the conclusion that all animals are equal.…

    • 905 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Animal rights activists have gained considerable attention in the past few decades through education of the public. The exposure of animal cruelty has led more people to support the need for animal rights. The question now is not whether or not animals deserve rights. Instead, the question is what should those rights be and how far should they extend. A key factor that determines what rights an individual deserves is dignity.…

    • 2019 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Often, we as people, are faced with a difficult question: is it morally right or morally wrong to eat meat. Alastair Norcross discusses this in his article, “Puppies, Pigs, and People: Eating Meat and Marginal Cases.” In this article Norcross tells the story of Fred, a man who lost the ability to taste chocolate due to a car accident. He sets up twenty-six cages of puppies, and leads them to live stress induced lives. This is because when the puppies are under stress, they produce a hormone called cocoamone, which can give Fred the ability to taste chocolate again.…

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The animal rights movement consists of privileged ideology based off emotion and no logic. Nathanael Johnson explores these ideals in “Is there a Moral Case for Meat?” and a couple in the film “At the Fork” explores the morality of farming. While the article and film seem to take similar stances on the farming of animals, I disagree. Humans do not have a responsibility to avoid meat or mitigate the suffering of farm raised animals.…

    • 1085 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Ethical Argument In Animal Welfare

    • 1672 Words
    • 7 Pages
    • 10 Works Cited

    Many show that a major issue in animal welfare should be solved by vegetarianism and not torture animals to get their meat. As Freeman argues, “animals used for food in the United States are commonly treated like unfeeling tools of production, rather than living, feeling animals,” (Freeman 170). Many feel the need to reduce meat because of animal cruelty, and not because of the welfare of the…

    • 1672 Words
    • 7 Pages
    • 10 Works Cited
    Great Essays