Wait, doesn’t this sound familiar? Furthermore, the second principle is more related to equality. “Social and economic inequalities are to be attached to offices and positions open to all under conditions of fair equality of opportunity; and second, they are to be to the greatest benefit of the least advantaged members of society (the difference principle)” (John Rawls; Justice as Fairness, page 42 (online text)). This principle suggests that all human beings are entitled to the same opportunities rich or poor, weather that be educational or even, economical. Furthermore, this principle also puts forth a distribution regulation of wealth and income, rather, as we know it, goods. Is liberty determined by the goods? Rather, does the amount of goods distributed determine what can be done with/the usefulness of
Wait, doesn’t this sound familiar? Furthermore, the second principle is more related to equality. “Social and economic inequalities are to be attached to offices and positions open to all under conditions of fair equality of opportunity; and second, they are to be to the greatest benefit of the least advantaged members of society (the difference principle)” (John Rawls; Justice as Fairness, page 42 (online text)). This principle suggests that all human beings are entitled to the same opportunities rich or poor, weather that be educational or even, economical. Furthermore, this principle also puts forth a distribution regulation of wealth and income, rather, as we know it, goods. Is liberty determined by the goods? Rather, does the amount of goods distributed determine what can be done with/the usefulness of