What Is Justice Bluffing

Great Essays
Over centuries and generations of warfare and politics, customs and challenges have changed and developed, but one course of action has always stayed the same. The act of bargaining has been bound to the debate of being able to receive benefits of creating peace or the consequences of lighting the fire of warfare within a nation. These obstacles of pushing to bargain for what one side desires is just human nature, anywhere from nationwide conflicts to mere bickering between two people at a swap meet. While there are a million prospective directions of where a settlement can go, one thing is certain that in politics and warfare is that there will either be peace or there will be war due to the nature of politics.
The politics of peace and war
…show more content…
Through closure bluffs, one nation can put a non-serious offer on the plate in hopes that the other nation will take the chance and fold over early because of a small threat which leads to peace all due to lack of information on one end. Knowledge bluffing refers to when one side can say they’ve heard certain accusations against the other party in efforts to scare them to convince them to fold over their ways. While justice bluffing is when one party pretends to be extremely discontent and angry with the other side before things even begin to make their opposition feel bad and try to make things fair with the angry side when settlements haven’t even started. With bluffing, it is a dangerous territory due to the reasons that this type of bargaining can affect peace or war with a 50/50 chance and it’s all falls upon how one …show more content…
For example, when tensions are rising between two countries, certain steps are taken within the country to avoid popular vote supporting war between the two countries. With a bargain tool or incentive for them not to go to war, or disadvantages of going to war are discussed, this can heavily influence the final decision of whether or not to go to war. This can also be done with having peace within the country. Through a certain amount of words or incentive, anyone can be convinced to change their decisions or initial mentality and opinion towards something. The best interest of the leaders of a country is to have representatives that are able to convince the people using forms of media such as propaganda and bargaining tools that can influence decisions whether or not to have war or peace. The effects of peace and war not only relies on those who make the decisions, but also those who broadcast the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Rhetoric Countering War

    • 435 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Rhetoric Countering War Throughout history, war has become the only solution to resolving conflicts between nations or groups. War is often something that is started off with tension, tension which is often caused or started due to conflicts or disagreements between different nations or different groups, and it is commonly characterized by violence, resistance, and mortality. A few examples in American history are the American-Indian Wars and the Revolutionary War. These various groups of people firmly believed that the only way they could advocate for what they were passionate in was to use violence to express it. However, in the first chapter of Everyone’s An Author, Wayne Booth takes another perspective into consideration and is quoted,…

    • 435 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In a Utopian Society everyone is equal, thus everyone is at peace with one another. Sadly, that’s not a concept most people today can wrap their heads around. Constantly being at war has become a societal norm, causing everyone to acknowledge and talk about it. The news, movies, and literature have become frequently used outlets to keep up to date with war. Tim O’Brien’s award-winning novel…

    • 1342 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “War does not determine who is right- only who is left,” is a quote by Bertrand Russell. This spectrum expresses the casualties of war. In other words, Russell means war is used as an outlet to define a “winner”, or in this case, someone who is right. The veiled truth is that there are no true winners of war when comparing the damage created and the lives lost. Looking at war through that perspective, John F. Kennedy, among others, also agreed.…

    • 1616 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Violence and destruction can never be quelled as it is inextricably linked to human nature. We as human beings wage war, and send the young, able bodied males to fight our battles while bureaucrats and wealthy individuals continue with their typical lives unaware of others’ misfortune and sacrifice; protected by laws and riches. Those who have the most life to live are sent to the front lines, in a way O’brien knew he would perish in the heat of a war he had no part in starting. A future Ivey league student being scooped up in the draft made next to no sense,young adults like him were the future of America, therefore; shipping him off to war would be sending the country's future into chaos and certain death. A government that could so easily strip him of his life and bright future had to be unjust.…

    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Before and After 9/11 Airport Security On September 11, 2001, there was a terrorist attack where an airplane crashed into the Twin Towers in New York killing thousands of Lives. The disaster of 9/11 has affected many citizens in the way they see the United States if it is a safe country to live in. The tragedy of 9/11 impacted Americans and Terrorist lives. Ever since 9/11 happened security has changed, especially in the airport because laws became strict on what you can take or not take on an airplane and racial profiling.…

    • 1299 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    War has become an acceptable way in which groups and states engage in problem-solving, no matter the intention. If war was frowned upon by humanity, or rather, those who are in powerful positions to start a war, then alternative methods of solving a disagreement would be primary and there would be no motivation to declare…

    • 540 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    From its earliest time, human history recounts wars among its civilizations. Wars were, and still are, typically accompanied by arguments for and against waging them. Many have justified war; many have lamented its consequences. It is said that war is a part of an effort to eradicate it all together someday, or that it is an inevitable part of life. War is a difficult subject to explain.…

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    First, they are efficient and save time and money by eliminating a trial. Second, plea negotiations guarantee a guilty verdict, which eradicates any possibility of an unknown verdict and the potential for no conviction (Vanover, 1998). Third, district attorneys s can use the plea negotiation of one defendant to build a case against another, associated individual (findlaw.com, n.d.). Ethical dilemmas effect all parties involved, including the victim and prosecution, defendant and defense, judge, jury, court system, and society as a whole.…

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Attributing ‘new wars’ to be determined by asymmetry as the most important feature provides suitable parameters of war which constitutes a ‘new war’ as the environment of war shifts as Clausewitz identifies but also the actors. As concluded, the lines of war are becoming much more blurred than in previous centuries due to close alliances between mercenaries and bandits. In addition, Münkler recognizes that similarities can be drawn from wars of the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries. He has brought together key elements from the wider literature of Political Violence and Terror referencing key theorists and attributing varied theories to Asymmetry with a wide range of aspects: technology, economics, motivations and ideology. Asymmetry provides an umbrella theme of ‘new war’.…

    • 1535 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Walter in “The Critical Barrier to Civil War Settlement” tries to explain why civil wars are never ended with a peaceful settlement and fought until one side beats the other. This is because there are problems of enforcement and vulnerability; both sides prefer to fight instead of cooperate because it leaves them vulnerable (Walter compares this exchange with the Prisoner’s Dilemma situation). Unlike interstate wars, making cheating not favorable is difficult; either side cannot withhold resources or build military defenses without triggering a response from the other side and there is no neutral force or government to enforce peace. According to Walter, there are two ways to solve this issue: design power-sharing institutions involving both…

    • 1084 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    His emotional writing acts to portray a biased argument, devaluing his validity. Macmillan, however, uses an detached writing style, placing forth a more convincing and balanced argument that the outcome of the peace treaty did take part in leading towards future conflicts but cannot hold full blame. She states in her article that the peace makers ‘had limited options’28 but that they managed to create a treaty that was ‘met with general approval in the Allied countries.’29 Therefore the Peace settlement cannot be entirely the cause of future conflicts, in some form ‘The outcome depended on the decisions of later leaders’30as…

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    War is fought between countries, but even in times of conflict between states, civilian affairs must continue. The Allied governmental leaders “who approved it were neither wicked nor cruel, though it may well be that they were too remote from the harsh realities of war” (Vonnegut 187). Unlike the military leaders, the governmental leaders were not present on the battlefield. Without witnessing the reality of war, the Allied leaders could not hope to grasp the true consequences of their actions. They dealt with numbers and spreadsheets rather than physical brutality.…

    • 1650 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Nature of Plea Bargaining in the American Criminal Justice System Many conceptualize the American criminal justice system as consisting of trials where prosecutors and defense attorneys argue over the defendant’s innocence. However, the truth is that the traditional court norm of a full-fledged trial is becoming increasingly rare as time goes on. As the population grows, more court cases will naturally enter the court system.…

    • 1661 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Does globalization make war more or less likely? 160009668 War has been an unavoidable human convention for thousands of years; whether it to be for land, religion, or ideology, mankind has almost always been in one conflict or another. But since World War II, inter-state war has declined during the process of globalization. Globalization is the economic, political, and social interconnecting of the world. This process has made war, the physical conflict between states, difficult to occur and therefore less likely to occur.…

    • 1856 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In “Rationalist Explanations for War,” James Fearon argues that due to war’s costly nature and states’ risk-averse, or at least risk-neutral, tendencies, there should always exist some possible prewar agreement between two disputing states that both parties would prefer to achieve over committing to war. While seeking to reveal his main claim that war is caused by information problems, commitment problems, and issue indivisibilities, Fearon critiques five traditional Neorealist explanations of war: anarchy, positive expected utility, preventive war, lack of information, and miscalculation of relative power. Although Fearon’s critique of the majority of these theories are earnest and do expose multiple logical shortcomings, his rapid dismissal…

    • 1115 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics