Actually, the scholar Robert figured out that Locke’s idea which is talking about taking what the person owns and mixing that with something which he would not be a problem maker. Novick used an example of mixing the tomato juice which he owned with the ocean. So does that mean that he own the ocean! Or he just lost the juice. Do you have any idea why he assumed that mixing that would own result in gaining he did not own. …show more content…
That definition forces the idea which is working to preserve themselves and help them also to preserve the society.
Locke contrasts the state of affairs before and after the evolution of the money. So eventually the money been agreed upon the currency shape, like the gold and silver, man’s equality of birth is the equality of the property. Money, however, placed value in a piece of gold or silver that did not rot. So to sum up, the existence of the money, the increase in in men and decrease in available sources and the proliferation of conflict over such resources necessitate the creation of a civil