Your analysis regarding research design and ethics is effective and convincing. Within the answer to the first question you mentioned, “a researcher’s prime responsibilities to a participant is to obtain consent, protect from harm and ensure privacy”. These responsibilities are protected by the code of ethics, which help safeguard the researcher’s reputation. Consent is more specifically called “informed consent”, as mentioned by Saul McLeod, physcology tutor at the University of Manchester (McLeod, 2015). Within this stage, the researcher outlines to his or her participants information about their research, and then asks for their consent. For a research to protect participants from harm they must effectively produce accurate and credible results, eliminating the possible spread of inaccurate falsified information. Insurance of privacy also is significant regarding research ethics due to the unfortunate possibility of …show more content…
I would like to note that within chapter six, Thornhill mentioned “as a full-time student, approaching an organization or group where you have little or no prior contact, you will be seeking to act as an external researcher” (Thornhill, 2016, pg. 225). External researcher must demonstrate competence and integrity, as undergraduate full-time or part-time students going into the corporate world, these characteristics that we as external research must develop before graduating from Schreiner. Also, within the last answer you proposed that there will not be any ethical issues when conducting research due to the absence of participant involvement. However, in my opinion, all research is subject to potential risk of ethics if not conducted in an appropriate manner. All research must be carefully analyzed to deem reliable and pertinent to any research topic of