What Is Hudson's Argument Against The Separation Of Power

Improved Essays
Separation of powers refers to the idea to guard against tyranny and preserve liberty and justice. Separation of powers was held that major institution should be divided and dependent upon each other so that one power would not exceed that of the other two branches. Today, Separation of powers is known as the checks and balances necessary for the government while others seems to think that the separation of powers is a destruction to our American government. In the book "American Democracy in Peril" by William E. Hudson, the author makes a significant argument regarding chapter 1 separation of powers, he states that our American government is officially inefficient, unresponsive, unaccountable, indecisive, and hypocritical. He views the need for separation of powers as inadequate, not democratic, and chaotic. Hudson suggests that the American people need to switch the democratic system into a parliamentary system in order to solve the problem like a government and get with the new program, so the majority can get their necessity met.

For Hudson's argument against the separation of powers he first look at partisanship in the system. He states that voters are increasingly electing a divided government and political parties. Divided
…show more content…
The author discuss on our American government is very hypocritical and indecisive. The issue whether or not our American government is a democracy or partisanship is an issue that has been present throughout history. When the first U.S. settlers came to America, they came because they were mistreated by their British parliamentary and had no representation in the British parliament. And they want a place where they are not oppressed and wanted a place where they could truly become a part of their government. In the end they end up oppressing other people like their British parliament and more corrupt with their

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    This quote from James Madison declares that the purpose for separation of powers is to make sure that not one person will hold too much power, no matter it be to make laws and enforce them, enforce law and explain them, or any combination of the three. If someone were to have power in more than one field, they would be classified as a tyrant. This is why today, we do not let someone in legislative, executive, and judicial at the same time because no matter what kind of government, a tyrant can still exist within that government. To make sure that no one person can be a part of more than one branch, Articles 1, 2, and 3 state the position of each branch. Article one, Section one gives the legislative power to congress.…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There were many ways that the constitution guarded against tyranny. In 1787 ,fifty five delegates met in philadelphia to fix the articles of confederation. They decided to make a new government, called the constitution, that prevented tyranny. Tyranny is a noun that means a cruel or oppressive government or rule. The constitution prevents dictatorship and tyranny in four ways: federalism, separation of power, small states vs. large states compromise, and checks and balances system.…

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The fundamental truth of separation of powers and checks and balances is that they prevent the government from gaining too much power which could potentially lead to a tyranny. Checks and balances help keep separation of powers by giving each branch specific powers that can check the other branch's actions. These checks and balances allow the branches to have limited power while maintaining the clear separation of powers into three branches and have ultimately created a limited/balanced form of government. Balance is described as an even distribution of weight enabling someone or something to remain upright and steady. The system of separation of powers distributes the government's power into three even branches while checks and balances allows these branches to stay even in power and prevent the branches from gaining too much power, overall enabling the government to stay upright and perform its duties to the people properly.…

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Separation of Power To ensure no person in the government has too much power. The government is separated into three branches, the congress, executive, and judicial branch. Each branch has different power, duties, responsibilities, and limitation.…

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If all three powers were in the same hands, then a group of a small number of people would have every power, such as creating laws, enforcing laws, and deciding if they are constitutional. By separating these three sections of government into three, equally powered branches, no person or group of people would have an overwhelming and dominating amount of power. This spread out the power, which annihilated the chance of the government invalidating the rights of the people. Separation of powers was only half of the solution. The other part to this was checks and balances.…

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Paper #3 – Critical Evaluation of Hudson’s Challenges to American Democracy In the textbook, American Democracy in Peril, William E. Hudson has written a well-thought out critique of the challenges faced by American democracy, but some of his methods and reasonings have issues. Hudson is looking for anything that he thinks might work in the American democracy. This paper will critically evaluate Hudson’s work and a few specific flaws in his proposals. Hudson is striving to make a difference, but he has not conscientiously considered the feasibility of his plans.…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dahl examines the performance of the American constitutional arrangement by comparing it to other democracies. Subsequently, Dahl examines the link between political equality and political democracy and rejects Tocqueville’s argument because the pattern of democratic development contradicts his assertion. Dahl concludes, with the idea that…

    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A strong democracy is essential for a state’s freedoms, liberties, and its well being. In order to obtain these notions, a democracy must receive legitimacy from the people. Legitimacy is the concept in which the people believe and give their consent to the government for its right to rule. A democracy functions accordingly to people’s will, and legitimacy will only fortify a democracy as the people will be allowed to judge and express opinions to make final decisions regarding the status of government officials and their privilege to hold power and rule over the state and citizens. As a first time democracy, Xlandia can begin to build legitimacy as it “binds itself to the rule of law.”…

    • 438 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the first chapter of William E. Hudson’s book American Democracy in Peril, Hudson discusses the reasoning and application of the separation of powers stemmed from the Constitution, and the impact it has had as well as the failures that came as a consequence of it. Due to the changing meaning of the Jeffersonian model, one of the failures Hudson argues is that the separation of powers in a partisan, party-based system falls apart once both parties are to blame. It is also argued that the same system creates a political minority “biased against change” to protect against the supposed tyranny of the majority. Hudson ends by making a case in favor of a change in government towards the form of a parliament for the sake of accountability and protection…

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Constitution Dbq Analysis

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The separation of powers is between branches of the national government. In a letter written to James Madison, Thomas Jefferson talked about the three branches of government and then he explains to him that, “The principle of the Constitution is that of a separation of legislative, executive, and judiciary functions except in cases specified”(document 2). This shows how the constitution guards against tyranny because it shows the separation of powers in the branches is what keeps things going smoothly in the government forms of control and splits it as equally as possible. Thomas Jefferson was also one of the founding fathers, he even wrote the declaration of independence and later he was the third president of the United States. His past affects his anti tyranny and his view on the separation of powers being crucial to that because he had a lot of history in working in the government so he knew just how helpful the organization between the branches, beneficial it can be to compromise, and how helpful it is for the people.…

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    So how the separation of powers worked was the government was split into 3 branches; The executive (The president and “workers”), Legislature (The senate and house of representatives) and the Judicial branch (Supreme court and lower courts.) So checks and balances “act” was built so that no branch would become to powerful. So each one branch is basically watched by the other two. So for example; The president (the “executive branch”) can veto laws by congress. Congress can override the veto by a 2/3rds vote.…

    • 1202 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Federalist Papers

    • 1384 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Federalist Papers on Division of Powers “A nation without a national government is, in my view, an awful spectacle. The establishment of a constitution, in time of profound peace, by the voluntary consent of a whole people, is a prodigy, to the completion of which I look forward with trembling anxiety.” After the American Revolutionary War, many Americans were opposed to the idea of a strong central government. They saw the idea of a strong centralized government as a gateway back into the familiar tyrannical government and abuse of power that they had just fought so hard to free themselves of. Nevertheless, a heated debate amongst the elitist groups had begun.…

    • 1384 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Constitution was the start of building America up into what we see today and has lasted for over 200 years. Its inception as the Articles of Confederation or the “hand-shake” among states, grew into something more united (U.S. Constitution signed, n.d.). With the signing of the Constitution of the United States in 1787, the republic government was formed and established the three branches of government with overlapping powers. The three branches include the Legislative, Executive and Judicial organizations.…

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Australia is said to be a democracy and seen as being about the people, and fair for all. Thus, separation of powers was formed to make sure that this is the case. Separation of powers puts the institutions of government into three different branches. These branches are: The legislature which make the laws; the executive government put laws into action; and the third brach,the judiciary interprets the laws. Separation of Powers is said to be the cornerstone of fair government.…

    • 1362 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The ‘separation of powers’ is a doctrine that has caused much debate through the centuries, and although it is difficult to find its exact origins, it is possible to distinguish a basic separation of powers doctrine from the writings of Greek philosopher Aristotle. He remarked that a constitution must have three elements to be effective. The three are, first the deliberative, which discusses everything of common importance; second, the officials…; and third, the judicial element. The English political theorist, John Locke, conceived a similar idea about the different types of power.…

    • 1162 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays