What Is Dying With Dignity Essay

Superior Essays
Dying with Dignity
I present to you a reality of intolerable suffering and torment with it’s not so distant relative, disease. Disease, who is often times incurable, malicious, seeking to make life intolerable, all the while inducing the hopeless to die. Indeed, even the rapid development of modern medicine does not assure the victim a means to cheat death. So if death is inevitable, what do we do to help those that fall under such circumstances? The answer is to let them decide to when and how to die, in other words, euthanasia. Although, it may seem euthanasia defies all ethnics and morals, it concedes terminally ill patients, the right to die with dignity and a means to unbearable suffering. Specialists, researchers, doctors, and legislators
…show more content…
McLachlan states, “To have the patient’s permission to kill him does not mean that the doctor has thereby a moral duty to kill him. To lack his patient’s permission to keep him plugged into a life support system does mean that the doctor has thereby a moral duty, and not merely a moral excuse, to unplug it.” (766) I find McLachlan statement to be an obscure opinion on what morality is. Morality is a particular system of values and way of thinking of a specific individual or society. So just because McLachlan has an opinion what he feels is humane, doesn’t necessarily mean that that’s the only correct way of thinking. “Physicians who treated dying patients found themselves caught between several forces: progressive expectations of patients, laws prohibiting assisted suicide, and the professional bias against accepting death. As patients demanded better end-of-life care, doctors who heard the calls for change lamented that their hands were tied by current law” (Hillyard et al 19). Author Daniel Hillyard research shows, that while legal demands continue to take hold of practices, the legal position of patients continue to grow exponentially. Because of laws prohibiting euthanasia, all options for terminally ill patients are limited. So how do physicians abide by the unofficial rule of doing everything possible to help terminally ill patients? The good news is, more and more physicians and …show more content…
Moreover, euthanasia is a form of relieving a patient from misery. Many times we often make decisions for others without actually ever being in their own shoes. This brings me to highlighting the importance of human rights and having the ability to make your own decisions. There is an on going issue where family and friends thinking they know what is in the patient’s best interest, often times leading them to a slow and painful death. It is important that patients remain the driving force when discussing their life. When we look into the financial aspects of euthanasia, thousands of dollars are spent trying to conserve the last bit of a dying body. The common cost for proper health care is $35,000-40,000. The cost for assisted suicide drugs averages around $35.00. Also, in a recent survey in Oregon, one of the few places where "assisted dying" is legal, showed, however, that in 66% of cases the reason for patients ' requests was because they did not want to be a burden (“Economical Aspects,” 2011). Not only are these patients feeling the pressure of very expensive health care expenses, but also the feeling of

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Is Assisted Suicide Ethical? Physician-assisted suicide, also known as euthanasia or mercy killing is the act intentionally inducing a painless and quick death to patients who suffer from serious forms of diseases or patients in a permanent coma (Sjöstrand). Normally, it is carried out by a doctor or a nurse. Euthanasia has raised a lot of controversies all over the world and the main argument is based on whether causing a painless death is ethical. The advocates of euthanasia claim that it is ethical to perform euthanasia on terminally ill patients since it is a solution to patients who are hopeless and in great pain.…

    • 1205 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    An article on Spiked by Brendan O’Neill describes a humanist’s view on euthanasia. He argues that euthanasia will actually be bad for the terminally ill patient. O’Neill claims that legalizing euthanasia will formalize something that should be a private decision. legalizing it will take away the privacy of the patient, making the decision more difficult than it already is as the patient is now subject to outside influence and judgement. O’Neill also argues that making euthanasia legal would replace “love with law”.…

    • 1295 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to the process of Euthanasia, the doctors are the ones questioned whether it is appropriate to carry out the process (Marker, 2013). Given this directive, people view it as a form of empowerment to decide whether the patient should die or not. It signifies a lack of confidence in the medical practices given the fact that technology has brought forth better medical services (Marker, 2013). Legalization of Euthanasia is a means of promoting suicide (Smith, 2002). Many people with pain will use it as a shortcut to end their lives, even when appropriate treatment is available.…

    • 2754 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However when we look at the defining terms of murder we can see that there is a vast difference amongst these terms. Murder is a malicious act with intent of killing another person, whereas euthanasia is driven by a person’s compassion, empathy, and desire to help their fellow human to end their life on their own terms rather than force them to go through the debilitating stages of their terminal illness. With murder the victim has no say in what is happening, but this is not the case with euthanasia. The person will have made their desires to end their pain and suffering known to their care giver, and then has asked for the assistance needed to do so. Often times, suicide is also compared to that of euthanasia and people often give the same views to both.…

    • 1406 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For example people who are in the early stages of the disease experience minor pain, such pain is common to regular disease and it would be immoral of them to take their life. In order to avoid this we could allow euthanasia to be offered only when the patient is in their late stages of the disease and the pain and suffering is unlike anything people feel with regular diseases. Euthanasia restrictions ensure that people still value their lives and only turn to euthanasia when their life becomes a living hell. We could have people coming in to talk to the patient in detail about the act of euthanasia and what they have to consider before making this choice. This would overcome the common belief that people are either reckless in that they do not value their life or uneducated.…

    • 1413 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pas Vs Euthanasia

    • 928 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Typically the individual seeking PAS has a painful terminal illness and is the one to perform the “last act”. Both the physician and patient are aware and comprehend that the patient intends to use the medication or intervention method to commit suicide. PAS and euthanasia are commonly misperceived as interchangeable entities. Euthanasia is an inclusive term which describes the medical process of a sickly patient ending his/her life, rather than the continuation of suffering until an inevitable death. The main discrepancy is that Euthanasia involves the physician intentionally ending the life of his or her patient.…

    • 928 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    People fear that patients will no longer trust their doctors enough to make substantial decisions for them. In a quote found in the article "Why I Believe in Voluntary Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide" the author states that "If help in dying is restricted to those who can take oral fluid, then a great many patients who need help are sidelined" (Humphry), confessing that physician assisted suicide is not beneficial to all patients. Patients can not help which surgeries they have to undergo and they can not help what limitations the surgeries put on them. Therefore, patients should not be denied to end there suffering because of something that is out of their control. Many people have the argument of saying that if physician assisted suicide is going to be legalized, then doctors should be able to ensure that all patients will be able to utilize this option.…

    • 1204 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Pain and suffering can be reduced with several medical interventions and physicians have varied options to try in treating their patients. Above all, the practice is morally wrong because it is a sign of defeat in accepting that there is no other solution. In addition, legalization of the practice will create the urge in many terminally ill patients to opt for ending their lives, thus establishing a wrong social…

    • 1822 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alzheimer's And Euthanasia

    • 1183 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In particular, right-to-die advocates have said that patients should be able to ask their doctors for help in ending their lives, an option they say is a humane alternative to living with pain and dependency (Infobase Learning). Opposers to this movement say that the process is immoral, that “every life is immeasurable”. That statement is as true as it can get but what many don 't take into consideration is that cases that may require assisted suicide are not typical lives, they are lives already condemned. The fear of dying makes people want time, time with loved ones, time to redeem and enjoy themselves while they can. But what’s the point of time for those with a disease like Alzheimer 's, when there 's no one to share time with and when that time is filled with confusion and…

    • 1183 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The comparison this argument makes is weak since, a person who is wants to be actively euthanized has to fit a certain criteria and the decision to even go through with euthanasia must come from a physician who is aware of the situation of the patient. Often times when a terminally ill patient decides to go through with euthanasia they suffer immensely from pain and are assured from a physician that they no longer have a chance of a healthy living. Suicide on the other hand is not authorized by anyone except the person who is suffering therefore a person might think that there only solution to their current state of living is death while, the pain that they are going through is temporary. In active euthanasia physicians look at the long term condition of the patient and decide that if the situation is the same or even worse than they are able to be euthanized. Therefore active euthanasia is a solution to a long term period of suffering that is recognized and also regulated by a professional, suicide however is not regulated by anyone expect the person who is committing it.…

    • 1393 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics