What Is Distrust In Government

Improved Essays
Today marks my 10th year of service for the people of Indiana working in the office of the attorney general. But my career in service to the people of Indiana began much earlier, in 1982, working for then-Senator Dan Quayle in Washington and later in the Bush-Quayle White House as an assistant to the vice president.

This experience in the legislative and executive branches at both the federal and state levels provides a unique perspective on the multi-faceted checks and balances that our founders devised. Our founders understood human nature and created this system of checks and balances because they knew that government is not to be trusted.

The resurgence of public interest in our Constitution is brought home to me regularly by people with pocket copies of our founding document, dog-eared and underlined. Almost daily I am asked fundamental questions on the limits of the federal government's authority, the proper role of the state and the protection afforded individual rights and liberties enshrined within the Constitution. Never in my wildest imagination did I dream I would see such remarkable widespread interest in the fundamental principals of our democracy. For me, it's a great time to be Indiana's attorney general.
…show more content…
Although times have certainly changed since the founders wrote our Constitution, systemic checks within government remain necessary. One is that state and federal governments properly check one another's authority. Our president and Indiana's governor have both brought changes through the exercise of authority. Legal challenges to this authority should not be seen as against a particular policy or political, but as part of the healthy checks and balances of

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    As Indiana's attorney general, I have legal obligations as the lawyer to state government that do not permit me to provide specific legal analysis or advice to the public, but only to my government clients. But I want to reassure all Hoosiers that our Constitution provides strong protections for both religious liberties and protections against discrimination. The current issues involving state statutes can in no way lessen any constitutional rights. But in addition to being the state government's attorney, I am a lifelong Hoosier who loves this state.…

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To think that the performance of different functions under different provisions of the constitution is comparable to the undertaking of a complete change in identity from provision to provision is effectively compared by Roberts to a car which, although engaging in both acts of transportation and storage, retains its identity as a car. Further, in the Smiley case referred to by the majority, Roberts points out that the court held that The Legislature was a phrase which possess and always has possessed a well understood meaning. Hildenbrant, cited by the Majority, also did nothing as grandiose as supplanting the legislative body as had been done in Arizona. While the precedent may recognize the legal exercise of a state’s people’s power to enact initiatives, it in no way provides for the constitutionality of the one at hand; if that were to be the case, it would presuppose that “the people” could mean “the Legislature” in the U.S.…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Constitution v. Tyranny The constitution is the Americans way to fight against tyranny. In 1787 when the constitution was written, the Americans wanted to protect the new nation from allowing one or few people from taking total power. This is known as tyranny.…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For most Americans, the Louisiana Purchase is regarded as one of the most influential treaties of our nation in expanding its borders and securing its status as a world powerhouse in political dominance. However, a significant yet otherwise subdued dilemma the Louisiana Purchase treaty caused was an unconstitutional expansion of federal powers, specifically with regards to the president. Robert Knowles argues that the assumed expansion of federal powers to include additions of states and integration into the union significantly hindered the balance between federal powers and state powers, granting the former much more importance in the “empire of liberty” model.…

    • 1066 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    On the federal level, the Constitution set a division among the executive, legislative, and judicial branches; locally the government must be granted permission by the state and the governing bodies are directly elected by the people. In total it left the maximum amount of freedom in the hands of individuals. This being said, a common concern among many in today’s society is whether or not a document that was written 229 years ago can still remain relevant in a world that is frequently changing. The Constitutions relevancy is based on the fact that it is a living document written with the possibility of amendments that allows for interpretation by the judicial system, that its purpose is to protect against dictatorship and usurping of power brought up by Anti-Federalist fears, and that it ultimately serves as a protective barrier for citizens’ civil…

    • 1481 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Supreme Court has gained a tremendous amount of power since the states first approved of the rights and limitations set forth for it in Article III during the Constitutional ratification process. Some of this accumulated power, such as the ability to analyze the constitutionality of Congressional legislation, appears to be justifiable in most cases. However, there have been several instances, especially the recent Obergefell v. Hodges case, where the Court has seemed to overstep its boundaries by a considerable margin. The problem is that the extent of the Court’s power depends on the interpretation of its authority as stated in the Constitution, and the Court itself has been granted the primary right to Constitutional interpretation. As…

    • 1241 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Federalists’ attempt to stifle the volatile passions of the public in the federal institutions is an example which will no doubt soon find its way into states, counties, and townships. The constitutional doctrine of placing faith in structures rather than people will result in a mass erosion of citizens’ power. Tocqueville explains this saying, “left to themselves, the institutions of the township can scarcely struggle against an enterprising and strong government…it is easy to destroy it” (Tocqueville, 56). But while the constitutional system makes for good government it does not make for good citizens. Had the Federalists kept the people “strong and independent, they fear partitioning social power and exposing the state to anarchy.…

    • 1325 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Luke Stafford PS 110 7/21/15 States and Federal Government Rights Does the Federal government have too much control? Is the Federal Government oppressive to the people and States of America? Or are states’ rights well protected in the constitution and political practice? To answers any of these questions, we need to look back and see what the Constitution is and the path that was taken by the founders to where we ended up with the Constitution.…

    • 1401 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Since the creation of the constitution, the world around us has changed tremendously. What may have seemed normal in 1787, has drastically changed over time. As the times of the world have passed and the modern age of American civilization have developed through the sciences and industrialization, so have the circumstances involving the interpretation of this ageless document. Through adaptation, there are two ways to apply the context of the constitution to modern times. The first is to Amend the constitution and the other is to apply a living constitution methodology.…

    • 212 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Most people wouldn’t know most of the things that the Constitution says in it. It is becoming old and people are forgetting about it. Sure the Constitution is ubiquitous, but it is also unknown to some people. The U.S. Constitution is an extraordinary document.…

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The United States Constitution is one of the shortest, longest standing, and most ambiguous constitutions in the world. This document establishes a democratic republic of many states under one federal government. In outlining the responsibilities and powers of each branch of the government and how they relate to state governments, many questions are left unanswered. Though this constitution outlines legislation’s role fairly clearly, it is far too vague concerning executive and judicial roles and the relationship between state and federal government.…

    • 1281 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In support of this point, cases such as Chrisholm v Georgia, Gibbons v Ogden, and the issue of the intitiution of slavery have already been settled. As an additional point, with the exception of several cases, the laws in which the federal and state governments abide by have already been layed down for years and followed with success. In brief, the system of governing the country has worked and will continue to work. There is no need to for states ' rights to continue to complicate this…

    • 1333 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Argument Against Welfare Testing

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 8 Works Cited

    University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law. (Vol. 15, Is. 5, pp. 1539-1559) Retrieved from http://web.b.ebscohost.com.southuniversity.libproxy.edmc.edu/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?sid=6b36aece-4bd5-4961-b371-ca7f92032795%40sessionmgr110&vid=2&hid=125 Martin, D. (2012, March 18).…

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 8 Works Cited
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The U. S. Constitution has an important feature and that is its provision for a system of checks and balances. In this system the branches are created and power is shared between them. The power of one branch can be challenged by another so that one branch cannot become too powerful. This is what a checks and balances system is all about. The U.S. Constitution created three branches as a part of our United States government.…

    • 375 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Just Government

    • 1281 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The word just can be defined as “acting or being in conformity with what is morally upright or good”(Just). By this definition, a just government is a government that acts for the good of the people and is morally upright. A just government is one that follows and applies its own laws consistently for all participants. If this definition was valid, the government created by the Constitution of the United States is not just. The constitution created a republican government with three branches and two houses.…

    • 1281 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays