College: Is It Worth It?
College is a huge part of life now and everyone is starting to realize it. Everyone has their own different opinions about college education and whether it is worth it, or if it is for everyone. The education debate remains unsolved about many things, in general, higher education; but more specifically: the quality of education, the overall worth of education, and whether or not college is for everyone, and though participants have achieved stasis about what higher education is about, intervention is necessary about argument types, such as; definition of education, conjecture, and quality, to help resolve this debate.
Gracy Olmstead, writer of “What College Isn’t For,” argues that certain people enter college thinking that college is just an avenue to a good job with great pay. She believes students don’t go …show more content…
Clearly, New Data Say”, and Adam Ozimek, Author of “Should Everyone Go To College?”, do not agree at all but do come to stasis as the talk about the same issue, whether or not to go to college. David discusses how if you have the chance, then you should most definitely go to college. He explains his argument by giving facts and statistics stating that in the long run college is well worth it. “Yes, college is worth it, and it’s not even close...never been more valuable.” (para 3). Ozimek cuts back at David by arguing that not everyone needs to go to college. He stresses that evidence doesn’t support David’s article. He continues to give job examples for high school graduates. “College graduates from age 24-35 earned less than the average male high school graduate” (para 6). It is very obvious that these authors don’t come to agreement about much. The reason why Ozimek’s article exists is because of Leonhardt’s article, he argues mostly against it. College education can be changed but it would take a lot of people to agree on something and using these authors as examples, that won’t
College is a huge part of life now and everyone is starting to realize it. Everyone has their own different opinions about college education and whether it is worth it, or if it is for everyone. The education debate remains unsolved about many things, in general, higher education; but more specifically: the quality of education, the overall worth of education, and whether or not college is for everyone, and though participants have achieved stasis about what higher education is about, intervention is necessary about argument types, such as; definition of education, conjecture, and quality, to help resolve this debate.
Gracy Olmstead, writer of “What College Isn’t For,” argues that certain people enter college thinking that college is just an avenue to a good job with great pay. She believes students don’t go …show more content…
Clearly, New Data Say”, and Adam Ozimek, Author of “Should Everyone Go To College?”, do not agree at all but do come to stasis as the talk about the same issue, whether or not to go to college. David discusses how if you have the chance, then you should most definitely go to college. He explains his argument by giving facts and statistics stating that in the long run college is well worth it. “Yes, college is worth it, and it’s not even close...never been more valuable.” (para 3). Ozimek cuts back at David by arguing that not everyone needs to go to college. He stresses that evidence doesn’t support David’s article. He continues to give job examples for high school graduates. “College graduates from age 24-35 earned less than the average male high school graduate” (para 6). It is very obvious that these authors don’t come to agreement about much. The reason why Ozimek’s article exists is because of Leonhardt’s article, he argues mostly against it. College education can be changed but it would take a lot of people to agree on something and using these authors as examples, that won’t