Hypocritical Death Penalty

Improved Essays
actually have lower murder rates than those with the death penalty, majority of studies find that the death penalty has no deterrent effect over and above the alternative sentence of life in prison without release, according to Professors John Donohue and Justin Wolfers, their view is that the death penalty deters is still the product of belief, not evidence; meaning that the death penalty may increase the murder rate as a deterrent, and individual states and cities such as Manhattan murder rate gradually dropped ten years and Chicago’s murder rate dropped by nearly a third during the first seven years after the state suspended executions.[6] Most importantly, reports have found that capital punishment has flaws that do not factor in the …show more content…
Also, if a victim lost his or her life to a horrific act the family will continue to grieve over there lost but they will have some type of closure that the offender was caught.[4] But is this considered being hypocritical? Some critics feel that capital punishment is being hypocritical.[4] Does it make it right that the justice system is committing the same act when a criminal is given the death penalty to the criminal for their wrong doing?[4] What is it teaching the criminal by giving them the death penalty? Some critics are against capital punishment because they feel the death penalty provides insufficient retribution to them.[6] They feel that life imprisonment without possibility of parole causes much more suffering to the offender than a painless death after a short period of imprisonment or capital punishment.[6] Do criminal fear punishment? I don’t think so especially when it involves crimes of passion, drugs and alchol, and …show more content…
Just to think that prison is like hell on earth due to the matter prisoners are faced with being gang-raped, castrated, beaten to death, stabbed, and sometimes even beheaded before correctional officers whom may turn a blind eye to what’s going on in there.[4]

Capital punishment

Is capital punishment the best answer? If murders have the power to take a victim’s right to live away, then the criminal justice system should have the same power to correct the deficiency by taking the criminal’s life.[4] Human life has no price tag on it. Some critics whom are against capital punishment believe that life is so precious that even the worst criminal’s life should not be taken.[6] They also believe that the offender 's life should be spared regardless of his or her crime.[6] Without capital punishment, it could be debated that the justice system provisions are not valid in response to the crime of murder, and consequently seeks no justice for the victim or the victim’s family.[4] Is this punishment valid as a deterrent to criminal’s behavior? If the criminal’s life is

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    When it comes to vengeance in the case of theft or rape, people do not exactly want an eye for an eye. They think putting the convicted criminal in prison is acceptable for a rape or robbery, but why do they think that the death penalty is the only reasonable punishment for a convicted murderer? Why does life imprisonment not work in a murder case? In this essay, I am going to argue that the…

    • 1902 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In discussions of capital punishment, one controversial issue has been whether or not the death penalty benefits the states that enforce capital punishment. On the one hand, those who oppose the death penalty argues that capital punishment is inhumane and should not be used to end someone’s life. On the other hand, those in favor of capital punishment firmly believe that the death penalty is the only way to make the world just. My own view is: the death penalty gives life value and justice; it helps reduce prison crowding, and ensures public safety. Americans today tend to believe that the death penalty is inhumane and if the government kills someone they are decreasing the value of life.…

    • 1122 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ninety-four percent of them agreed there was little empirical evidence to support the deterrent effect of the death penalty. When states that have death penalty laws are compared to states without death penalty laws the crimes rates are the same. According to North Carolina department of justice, the murder rate has declined the past years since the last execution in 2006. Nationally, murder rates are significantly lower in states that don’t use the death penalty. Prosecutors themselves are trying to reduce death sentences as well, since 1999 number of death row sentences has…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I personally think that the Death Penalty is wrong because of its not right to kill why should it be right to kill someone else with the death penalty, by going that far with everything you midis well have a purge. If someone if accused with murder then that person should have to deal with a punishment that nobody wants to deal with and that is spending there life in prison looking up for life with nothing to see is walls and bars because killing the person who had done the kill is too easy of a punishment, it isn’t even a punishment. Legislative Branch: Death Penalty is wrong I understand punishment to people who do the wrong thing but to end their lives, the government should be able to subject criminals to the death penalty. The…

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If someone is to commit murder people will want to see the person be punished, and most will favor and push for the death penalty. Society tries to eliminate crime and seek justice by having capital punishment, but these factors lead to wrong decision making. Once people notice the gravity of a situation they become subjective and it can cause the authorities to wrongfully accuse an innocent person of a crime. For example, if multiple children are murdered, the parents and the communities will seek authorities to find the person responsible, which they should, but it can cause the authorities to hastily accuse one of being the “cold-blooded killer.” There was a case where this happened, “the legend of Cropsey became disturbingly real with the psychopath Rand, who used to be a physical therapist at Willowbrook. From his various secret lairs, he would maneuver and plan his kidnappings and murders, such as that of Jennifer Schweiger, Holly Hughes, and Tiahese Jackson” (Elshamy).…

    • 1069 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    It would give the citizens a feeling of safety knowing a potential threat will not be on the loose again. Also, a serial killer should be sentenced to death because serial killers have committed the act of murder multiple times. After the first time someone might regret killing a human being but a serial killer feels no remorse for the victims he has hurt, and therefore, should just die. An adherent of this position may believe that it would be fair for the victim’s family to decide the fate of the criminal since the criminal decided the fate of the victim. Another belief held would be that it is the job of the…

    • 2346 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Death Row Penalty “The death penalty is a legal process whereby a person is put to death as a punishment for a crime” according to study mode. Also, there is a lot debate on regarding whether the death penalty is effective or not in terms of punishment and its morality. One half of the side of this debate would argue that the death penalty is an ineffective way to serve justice to even the most horrible criminals because no matter what happens, murder is still murder. The death penalty is immoral, putting a strain on our humanity as humans, providing a deterrent for prisoners serving life sentences; in addition it is unconstitutional as the eighth amendment forbids the infliction of cruel and unusual punishment. And…

    • 982 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The topic of death penalty is very controversial, there are some who strongly believe it should be allowed and some who believe it should be abolished. For both reasons there is research that supports each opinion. The death penalty has killed innocent wrongfully convicted people and should not be allowed in any part of the world because killing someone for a crime they committed is not called justice, it is called revenge. There are there other alternatives, ending a person’s life is not the solution, instead of the capital punishment they should be getting life in prison without parole. Abolishing the death penalty does not mean we are not going to punish the criminal; it only means we are doing it in a way that will not disrespect the life of a human.…

    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Some people say that crime keeps going up. Others say that it is going down as time goes on. Either way, some people feel that capital punishment is a deterrent of crime. Others feel that the death penalty is inhumane and a cruel and unusual punishment that will never be appropriate, no matter what the crime was. People who are pro-capital punishment theorize that a person is less likely to commit a crime because they do not want to die at the hands of the government.…

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Unfair Death Penalty

    • 1356 Words
    • 6 Pages

    If a criminal has done awful things, do they really deserve to live? Do we really want to waste oxygen on these human beings that clearly have no regard for other human life? Many of the people on death row have been offered second chances, but squandered those chances. If they mess up more than once, then what is the point of locking them up and hoping that they learn their lesson. Well, killing them will not solve the problem, it would just push it away for a little while.…

    • 1356 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays