What Is Brutus Persuasive Speech

Improved Essays
In Act III of Julius Caesar the play Antony and Brutus both make speeches on based on Caesar’s death. Both speeches have different opinions and strive to the best of their ability to convince the people in their direction. Brutus had a very persuasive speech but Antony’s speech gave the crowd made more of an impact. Antony gave the people exactly what they needed to side with him and truly believe in him. This is why Antony’s speech was better than Brutus’.
Nonetheless, Brutus’ speech really resonated with the crowd at first. Brutus really points out how awful Caesar was and would’ve been as the absolute ruler of the Roman Empire. He points out Caesar’s main weakness. Act III, Sc. 2 Brutus says, “As Caesar loved me, I weep for him; as he was
…show more content…
He cleverly makes the words mean more than they are and turns the crowd around with little to no effort. In Act III, Sn. 2 Antony says “When the poor have cried, Caesar hath wept: Ambition should be made of sterner stuff” (ln 88-89). As Brutus had said earlier that ambition was Caesar’s worst feature, Antony is trying to convince the people of Caesar’s caring side. He continues to persuade the crowd with Caesar’s good intentions. Caesar refused the crown to be put on his head three times making him humble. Caesar brought back captives from Rome. Antony’s love for Caesar stood out much more than Brutus’ and therefore brought more sympathy. The people started to feel bad for Caesar. Antony kept repeating the phrase in Act III, Sc. 2 “Yet Brutus says he was ambitious; And Brutus is an honorable man” (ln 90-91). At first Antony seemed to really mean that but as he went on the saying started to mean something else. It meant that Brutus wasn’t exactly as honourable as everyone thought he was because he killed Caesar and Caesar was the real honourable man. Antony ended with Caesar’s will. Antony would not read it even when the crowd pleaded. And when he finally thought it the right moment to read the will the crowd no longer had any doubt that killing Caesar had been the wrong

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    In my opinion, Antony speech was more delivered better because includes several persuasive details in his speech. After saying that his intent wasn't to praise Caesar, he says, "He was my friend, faithful and just to me. " Antony's speech points out many of Caesar acts that had benefited them as Roman citizens. He plays with their minds saying that Caesar had been generous to them and protected them from the "intruders". He uses rhetorical questions, irony, and etc. to effectively persuade his audience to join his side instead of Brutus'.…

    • 114 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Despite both Mark and Brutus gave persuasive speeches, Mark had more examples to contradict Brutus’s points, while Brutus based his speech off unknown future events. In Mark Antony’s speech he used the rhetorical device logos to explain his logic and stated, “I thrice presented him a kingly crown, Which he did thrice refuse: was this ambitious?” (Stanza 3). There is proof within the quote that Caesar was not ambitious because he did not accept the crown. Mark also adds a rhetorical question to emphasize the point he is making.…

    • 274 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The speech given by Brutus in William Shakespeare’s Tragedy of Julius Caesar was most effective due to the use of pathos, ethos, and logos.…

    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    His point is important in his argument because it uses the emotions of the audience as a way for them to feel anger towards Caesar, ultimately allowing them to realize that under Caesar, they would be slaves. Out of the arguments Marc Antony and Brutus presented, Brutus had the stronger of the two. Brutus used this argument and emotion to get the pulpit to agree with him because the audience can easily comprehend what he is saying and he presents it in such a way that if Caesar were not to have been killed, this slavery would have been the only…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, at the beginning Brutus was able to sway the Roman people to see his side of the story. He included logos and ethos in his argument to make it more effective in gaining the citizens trust. In some aspects the arguments are similar, but one is more effective that the other. Antony's speech is the greater of the two.…

    • 725 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This grows his credibility in the eyes of the people and the people begin to put their faith in him and his point of view. Antony also says in his speech, “I come to bury Caesar, not to praise him.” Through this simple statement he is proving to the simple people in the audience that his character is not one that would mess with their minds, or try to convince them of something they don’t already believe him. Now whether these statements are his true character or not is irrelevant. The audience believes his intentions and choses to follow his ideas rather than the ideas of Brutus, making him the more effective speaker in this…

    • 1020 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Act III, Antony stands in front of the group of Plebeians after they have just listened to Brutus, the conspirator’s, reasonings as to why Caesar deserved his death. Mark Antony uses compelling rhetoric, to switch their mindsets, so the commoners pledge to his words instead of Brutus’s. Some may believe Brutus’s leadership skills make him a great speaker, but Mark Antony’s powerful, raw words…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During this time Antony is trying to come up with something that will not only discredit Brutus, but also make the citizens band around him. So he goes “My heart is in the coffin there with Caesar, and I must pause till it come back to me”. Antony uses this quote to emphasize how much he loved Caesar, and the sadness he feels now that Caesar is gone. It is this grief that makes the citizens of Rome sympathetic to him, thus leading to them to wonder if Caesar death was…

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Many people assume that effective leaders are conceded, and they don not care for others. However, in reality they are kind to the people and are trying to help them in any possible way. Kindness is the most important quality of an effective leader because it demonstrates to the people that the ruler can be trusted and honorable. This leadership quality is shown through Brutus in Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar and in the historical example of Peter the Great.…

    • 1093 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    He convinces the crowd that Caesar was great. The crowd would feel guilty about trusting Brutus, after Antony persuaded them he was almost pathetic, this makes the crowd angry and they rebel. Antony also says "Here was Caesar! When comes such another?" which makes the citizens feel guilty and like they'll never get another Caesar, so they have missed there chance to let Caesar…

    • 1412 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In addition to defending a Caesar’s dead body Antony had to go back in the past to things he has done for the people, and he is not even defending himself. Not alone that Antony has to worry about the conspirators, he even sent a servant to the scene of murder to make sure he was not a target on the group of conspirators list. Consequently, leading to Antony fearing for his life while giving his speech. Then after he gave his speech he was able not only calm the crowd, but to convince them to go against the conspirators and want kill them. Overall while Brutus’s speech was exceptional and was able to calm the crowd and change their minds into thinking Caesar was a tyrant.…

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Antony states his direct purpose and asks for his audience’s attention outright, thus creating mutual respect through ethos by addressing his peers as equals. In addition, Antony appeals to the crowd’s emotions by mentioning Caesar’s will and how every citizen lies within in lines 132 and 133 of scene 2 in Act III. This employment of pathos riles up the audience and influences them to join his side, yet it also creates a leash with which Antony ties to the crowd to fulfill his agenda. Continuing, Antony leaves nothing to chance or opinion by focusing on the fact that he has no business in disproving Brutus’ words, but only to speak what he knows (III. ii. 100-101). Antony manipulates ethos in this instance to protect his integrity by addressing that his goal does not lie within feuding with another.…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Antony has to slowly plant doubt and anxiety that perhaps Brutus was wrong; that although he is a good and honorable man, Brutus could have just murdered another good man, who was only doing good for Rome. Antony uses his words to manipulate the people’s minds much better than Brutus did. The people know that Antony was Caesar’s good friend and the good things he is saying about Caesar are credible. Since Antony is changing the crowd’s perspective about who Caesar was, his continuous good remarks about Brutus keep them from getting angry and…

    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Yara Mneimneh Mrs. Kate Bowler English 10 A 12 December 2015 Analysis of Marc Antony’s Funeral Speech In Act III Scene II, Marc Antony presents his famous speech that begins with “Friends, Romans, Countrymen, I come to bury Caesar not to praise him”, this speech was able to change the minds of the audience to turn against the conspirators. The purpose of Antony's speech was to show tribute to his friend Caesar in a eulogy and to revolt the audience. Antony wanted the audience to revolt for him to seek revenge on Caesar’s brutal murder. The purpose contributed to the significance of the speech in the play.…

    • 1152 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Brutus Speech Analysis

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages

    After Caesar’s death, in the play Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, the conspirators and Mark Antony speak to the public to explain what has happened to Caesar. Brutus, one of the main conspirators and Caesar’s best friend, talks first and gives the Romans the reason as to why Caesar had to be killed. Brutus’ speech is very convincing and he manipulates the crowd into believing him easily. After Brutus speaks, Mark Antony, Caesar’s good friend and second in command, gives a speech about Caesar and how he did not deserve to die, easily turning the crowd against Brutus and the other conspirators. Both speeches use persuasive techniques, like ethos, and rhetorical devices, like repetition and rhetorical questions, to manipulate their audiences…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays