What Is Argumentative Essay On Gun Control

Superior Essays
Gun Control: Unconstitutional or Constructive? In a nation of differing opinions, a few issues stick out. Gun control is one of them, a widely debated subject punctuated by acts of heinous violence. In an attempt to curb this violence, articles such as “Crime, Deterrence, and Right‐to‐Carry Concealed Handguns”, by John Lott, argue that less gun control would lead to less crime. The other side of the coin argues that more gun control would lead to less violence, and this is the argument that the article “GUN CONTROL AFTER HELLER AND MCDONALD: WHAT CANNOT BE DONE AND WHAT OUGHT TO BE DONE”, by Gary Kleck, takes. These two articles disagree on a few main points, such as if gun control would actually influence gun violence, if self defense is …show more content…
In Lott’s article, he argues that self defense is a constitutional right and that it is needed to protect an individual and his/her family. According to the Supreme Court, the Second Amendment protects the right of the individual to possess firearms within their own property for the purpose of self defense. He argues that this is especially important in warding against burglars and those who attempt to break into homes. Of the four million burglaries that happen each year, only thirteen percent of them happened when there was a person at home. This is because “felons have often revealed that they are more deterred by the thought of running into an armed homeowner than they are of being caught by the police”(3). This is an excellent example, as Lott says, of how increased legal firearm carrying by citizens would deter criminals from committing crimes. Along with this, legal concealed gun carrying by citizens as they go about in public also protects against rape, deadly assault, and theft. In the hypothetical situation that Lott uses, if more people were encouraged to carry a concealed weapon there would be less rape, deadly assault, and theft because if there is a high percentage chance that the victim has a firearm the criminal will be less likely to commit the crime. Many criminals commit crimes against those they know do not have a way …show more content…
Lott argues that more gun control would do absolutely nothing, and be very ineffective. Lott says that criminals oftentimes procure their weapons illegally, and tightening gun restrictions would not do enough to completely stop illegal firearm trafficking. Therefore, gun violence would not be lowered. Lott compares this idea to illegal drug trafficking. Even though many narcotics, including marijuana, heroin, cocaine, and methamphetamines, are illegal in the United States, there is a high availability of each of these illegal substances. Lott says that the same would happen with firearms. Simply outlawing firearms will not solve the problem. Lot also argues that less gun control would be far more effective. If more people are encouraged to possess concealed firearms, then more criminals would be deterred from committing crimes. Lott argues that “the expected penalty of the crime affects the prospective criminal’s desire to commit a crime”(6). However, Kleck argues the opposite. He says that by restricting the supply of firearms within the country and tightening security at the Mexico border, less violence will happen. Making sure there are essentially no firearms are in circulation would lead to dramatically less gun violence, as it would make it increasingly difficult for a criminal or a mentally ill person to possess a firearm. By implementing a system of

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Why should the government take away people 's guns rights when they use them for self-defense LaPierre and others argue, “that not only gun-carrying individuals ward off attackers, but criminals are deterred because they do not know who does or does not carry a concealed weapon.”(Mantel 9). If criminals are scared that good people are carrying guns also, they will be less likely to commit a crime. If criminals do try and shoot others, there will be good people there to protect themselves with their guns. The streets will be safer and allow society to become better however others believe otherwise. Allowing people to carry guns on the street will increase the crime rate many believe.…

    • 1530 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Creating more gun control laws would not stop the crimes related to guns, but rather, ownership and people being educated does, as criminals would still find a way to have access to a gun and commit a crime. When a state puts restrictions on the ownership of guns, they tend to have more gun-related murders.…

    • 1090 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Is Gun Control Good Or Bad

    • 1068 Words
    • 5 Pages

    There are many arguments for enforcing and implementing stricter gun control laws that will help decrease violent crimes in the country. Unfortunately, gun control does not help decrease violent crimes, but negatively affects those law abiding citizens of the United States. Going against gun control is more beneficial…

    • 1068 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    By adding more and stricter gun laws, there will come a point that our second amendment will be taken away from the people. Stricter gun laws would make it harder for civilians to protect their home and families. If we had less gun control it would be easier to defend and protect them self when the police cannot make it in time. And criminal will think twice before committing a crime. The reason why we should not have stricter gun control law is because the problem is not adding more gun laws that will not solve the solution to why we have deaths or guns falling to the wrong people.…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It can violate the 2nd amendment, which is of course “right to bear arms.” There has been so much in the media about gun control. The majority of the media does not show what concealed and carry is capable of in a positive way, but only the negative. People believe gun control is there to have their guns seized. There are more than enough restrictions on guns, so there for the majority of people that can have guns are safe to be around. This proven claim shows my thesis is correct by having restrictions on guns, is not stopping criminals from obtaining illegal guns, but only making it more difficult for innocent, clean slate civilians to possess…

    • 1892 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Gun Control Effectiveness

    • 1667 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Why is the Gun Control in the area that have the strictest laws on gun control not working? The answer is obvious it only prevent legal sales of firearms, it can’t stop illegal sales. Although gun control can stop some petty criminals from getting their hands on a gun. It can’t stop a determined one from getting it illegally from an illegal dun dealer. By definition a criminal is someone who does not abide by the laws.…

    • 1667 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It states that gun control is helpless to avoid kids to use guns. After that, gun control is not a guarantee of reducing deaths. To implement gun control, it means governments restrict the sales, purchases, owning and carrying guns. It is not only ineffective in reducing death rates, but that increases with high speed. Similarly, criminals do not care laws as they illegally do many other things.…

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun Control Restrictions

    • 1074 Words
    • 5 Pages

    This explains that if too many firearms are circulating in increases the chance of violent crimes, therefore if there are less guns there will be less violent crimes. If there were gun restrictions it would make it harder for…

    • 1074 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In James Q. Wilson’s essay “Just Take Away Their Guns," he expresses how more authoritarian control over guns would not have the best outcome in comparison to actually implementing methods on reducing illegal firearms on the street. Wilson argues that in order to fulfill a peaceful nation, there would have to be a nation wide sequestration of firearms. Although, that could potentially solve and reduce crime, it would also be infringing on the rights of a lot of gun owners. Perhaps more importantly, the right to self defense would be limited, as most people use a weapon as a means of self defense. While making more stringent laws regarding guns could be a potential way of reducing crimes, firearms will, and always be a means of protection when it comes to self defense.…

    • 1216 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why Guns Are Bad

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Your normal citizen doesn't have drugs, but bad people do. If guns are taken away, only the good people won't have them. ( Ronald Cruise). The gun control law is not being followed by some citizens, therefore more rules are being added to the law towards gun control a good background check will keep the guns out of people who should not have them to prevent criminal, drug dealers, domestic abusers, and mentally ill people from carrying the gun. therefore, people who do not follow this law should face consequences, for example, time in jail or police taking gun licene from guns holder.…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays