Animal Testing Is An Ethical Form Of Science

In the United States alone, notably around 100 million animals die every year from lab testing, including larger animals like dogs and cats, along with smaller rodents. With animal testing on the rise, it is called out for being an unethical form of science. There are scientists and pro animal rights activists constantly on the search to reduce the number of animals involved in animal testing. They are trying to find alternatives to help layout a better blueprint for the science world. For instance, there are different types of lab testing that are used in an attempt to make animal testing more humane, as well as trying to pass laws that limit the use of animals in testing, scientists are stepping towards more animal free labs. In today’s society, …show more content…
Using in-vitro methods, it diminishes the use of the mice and other rodents in the earlier stages of laboratory testing ("Science and Research"). Even more, in-vitro testing can replace testing on animals when it comes to extensive drug testing for large-scale pharmaceutical industry because of the “ease of culture for production, compared with the use of animals, and because of economic considerations” ("Summary of Advantages and Disadvantages"). This allows a certain test to be replicated numerous amounts of time, all while keeping the costs relatively low.
As well as replacing animals, while choosing in-vitro methods, it will decrease the amount of laboratory personnel. In every lab that requires animal testing, veterinarians, animal handlers, and those who have to feed and take care of the animals, they will not be as greatly needed if animal testing is replaced by in-vitro testing. With a less amount of people to pay to take care of the animals, the less the government has to pay out to the workers. Therefore, in-vitro testing can be a less expensive form of testing rather than using animal