The Importance Of A Roman Tribune

Improved Essays
What is a Roman Tribune, you may ask? First, let 's break the word up. In roman, the word means a native, inhabitant, or citizen of ancient or modern Rome. The word tribune is a person who upholds and defends the rights of the people. A Roman Tribune is an officer or leader the people chose to protect and have a voice to their rights to be citizens of the country. There were also many army tribunes and treasury tribunes to keep the peace and the enforce the people. It was created for the people to communicate with the leaders and discuss such problems and news around the country. The great power of the tribune was that they could veto any act or advertisement they wanted too with correct reasons. The history of a Roman Tribune started …show more content…
They were the only people to involve with the senate and to suggest new laws for the people. The Roman Tribune were basically allowed to veto any congress law. Powers of all ten Roman Tribunes varies a lot. The main type of tribune was military. This position of command was highly elevated. This was one the most difficult decision the plebeians had to pick in their time. The role of this tribune is more like a political and leadership point of view. This was a promotion in the political career for many.
Tribune of the Celeres is another tribune that is quite important. This person was the king’s personal bodyguard. This tribune was second in command only below the king. Only the king and tribune can declare actual war on a country. (Tribune,2016) Many of times the tribune uses his relationship with the king to use him for his own plans and desires. We see this many times as history plays itself, a strong and dominate the others and fall from the inside. The tribunes of treasury for Rome was never noticed. This role was one of the weaker ones. All the tribunes of the treasury were really the bosses of banks some may say, but this is short lived because the other tribunes took this place very
…show more content…
With all this importance and power going around this caused a lot of debates and conversations around Rome to get

rid of this system of control. Many tribunes were involved in power issues and where everyone stands in power and who deals with who.
In the book, Julius Caesar, Casca, Marullus, and Flavius are all tribunes of Rome. This is quite
Hall 3 important in this outstanding play. This means all three of these roles help us understand the power we 're dealing

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The group of men in the Roman Senate were responsible for war policy, controlling lands, government decisions and making laws. The Roman government benefited from the Roman Senate because the Senate kept there government stable. In the Roman Senate there were only 300 men, which is a very small number of…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Roman Republic was built on the traditional policy of compromise, devoted to ensure the welfare of the people. In time, the struggle for authority brought fundamental changes to the traditional sentiments of the Republic. As territory expansions brought great wealth into the country, power hungry senators and government officials harbored political ambitions and competed for power. Political treachery and self-interest within the senate and the assemblies gave way to economic turmoil and social unrest. The fight for control under the existing Republic ultimately demanded a conversion toward Empire, but before the transition could take place Rome would have to go through a series of civil war, mob violence and murder.…

    • 1796 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Julius Caesar Dbq

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages

    It was the tribune’s job to make sure that the people were treated fairly and just. The Senate Senators went to the Senate to discuss important government issues. Senators were retired magistrates and knew a so much about the government of Rome. It was the job of the senate to give advice to the two consuls to make decisions which would affect Rome.…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rise Of Rome Dbq

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages

    There was an assembly of the people that had no real power and it needed approval from Senate. The plebeians felt that they should get more rights and voice in governance, since they also fought in Rome’s wars. Further, because of the many wars, Rome’s economy was in a dire state. It was the poor who felt the pinch more than any other group.…

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Gracchi Brothers Rebellion

    • 1186 Words
    • 5 Pages

    One of the unique features of public service in the Roman Republic was the delicate balance between refining Rome and gratifying the aristocracy that overpopulated every legislative body. Those courageous enough to defy typical conventions and the hierarchy of Roman politics encountered delightfully diverse methods of death. The most notable examples of Roman politicians who died in infamy were Tiberius and Gaius Gracchus, tribunes who encouraged populist land reforms and repeatedly flouted the limits of their power. While their reforms were necessary, the Gracchi brothers’ rebellion further engendered an authoritarian relationship between the controlling Senate and Consuls, thereby portraying them as selfish enemies of the state, and weakened…

    • 1186 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    These consuls were in charge of governmental decisions, choosing officials, and commanding the Roman army. The only things that had a higher authority that the consuls were the emperor’s commands, and the laws of the…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Julius Caesar is upheld as one of the most influential politicians of European history. Caesar was truly influential for every man and women of Rome. Caesar was successful in the battle field and had a large group of dedicated followers, but more importantly Caesar caused some anger and some extreme hatred towards himself. Julius Caesar was assassinated because the people of Rome stood firmly against a tyrant, rumors regarding Julius Caesar caused fear and uncertainty of Rome’s future, and people had personal vindications against Caesar himself. Romans prided themselves on their involvement in their government with their right to vote.…

    • 1862 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    4. What factors characterized the interactions of “civilized, settled” societies which were nomadic? Look at the Huns, Vikings, and the Mongols. In what ways did they values of these societies differ? Thier social structure?…

    • 1240 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Citizenship is a status given by a government to some or all of its people. Rome gave citizenship to most of its people, whereas Athens gave citizenship very few of its people. The Roman government was more lenient to its population 45,000,000 people. The Roman government had a system set up for those who were foreigners and wanted to become citizens. The Romans may have been lenient, but they had limits for citizens too.…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The city, or capital of the Roman Empire Rome was much like some of the United States' big cities. Such as New York, the city is very densely populated and dirty. It has a lot of business and is always busy with things going on all around you. Rome was also very big, just like the United States, our country is almost as big as Africa all together, and some of our states like Texas are as big as many other countries around the globe. In Rome they spoke Latin, this is very similar to the main language we have today in the United States.…

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Save The Roman Republic

    • 177 Words
    • 1 Pages

    However, none of this would matter if it was all for the common good of Rome and to save the republic, except there wasn’t a true republic to save. Most of the senators were in their position of power because of their families and their wealth. Consequently some of the senators looked down upon the citizens such as when Casca said “if Caesar had stabbed their mothers, they would’ve forgiven him”(I,ii,269-270) to criticize the people of Rome. Their similar backgrounds likely meant that they rarely had opposing viewpoints. The Roman people did not have the same background as the senators and, the citizens’ views were rarely properly represented by these senators.…

    • 177 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Roman Empire influenced literature, art, language, the creation of law, democratic government systems etc. The Roman law was known as the twelve tables which was their first code of law. The idea, innocent until proven guilty’, originated from the Roman’s as well. Roman law’s first code was the twelve tables which had a tremendous influence on Western law today. The distinction between public law (“the law of relations between individuals and the state”) and private law (“a branch of the law that deals with the relations between individuals or institutions, rather than relations between these and the state”) were developed.…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Roman Government Structure

    • 1283 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Ancient Roman government structure is something that was unique to civilizations at this time. The Romans were trying to be different and better than the civilizations that had come before them. The book Rome, the Greek World, and the East: Government, Society, and Culture in the Roman Empire examines the differences between the Romans to the other successful civilizations that had come before them. This provides a good insight into why the Roman model was considered special and unique from the rest of the world. It also theorizes on what the Romans wished to embody as they structured their empire.…

    • 1283 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Roman Republic was very democratic and in Document A it states that by telling you that Roman Republic was a democracy. In Document B Professor Fergus Millar tells more about how the Roman was a democracy as he states , “The constitution of the Roman Republic made it a variety of democracy. Every adult male citizen, unless specifically disqualified, had a vote, and there was no formal exclusion of the poor , free slaves could also vote.” Document B states more by telling the most fundamental of all the rights of the people was, however, the fact that they, and they alone could legislate. There were very practical barriers to fair and equitable voting in the popular assemblies said in Document C. “The Roman constitution has three elements ,…

    • 141 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Explain the negative effects of the Roman conquests Rome held a fate that would be devastating to the city-state following its great conquests. However, to understand the unraveling of the Roman republic, it’s important to understand how Rome obtained the position it had and what ultimately caused the negative effects. To do this an overview of how Rome became the fairest one of all is necessary. This essay will briefly examine how Rome rose to power and through power and greatness lost its upper hand and became torn.…

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays