What Is A Life Worth By Amanda Ripley Analysis

Decent Essays
The Time Magazine article “What Is a Life Worth?” discusses how the government invented a formula to determine the monetary value of a person’s life. The author, Amanda Ripley, poses the question: “Is a poor man’s life worth less than a rich man’s?” Using reasoning and true stories, she concludes that everyone’s life is worth the same regardless of a person’s wealth. I contend the opposite. The government’s method of compensating families after 9/11 was the right decision.
It may seem like economists price an individual’s value, but that is simply not the case. The compensation that government allots to the families does not define the worth of the individual. It is merely a method of providing the family with an income. As specified by the article, the first step--the most important step--is to “estimate how much a victim would have earned over his or her lifetime had the planes never crashed.” (para. 7). Then they add on a plethora of more money for “‘pain and
…show more content…
The article explains an incident concerning the divorced parents of a woman killed in the Pentagon. One would expect them to be mourning for their child, but instead of being at the funeral, they sauntered into the court room and demanded that they get the money. Her father goes as far as to announce, “‘I feel that I’m entitled to something.’” (para. 15). It is evident that these families are not “victims” as the article points out, but merely entitled brats who use their loved ones’ deaths as an excuse to gain wealth. Ripley thinks it to be unfair that the government does not allocate more money to the families; she even goes as far as to suggest that the math used to calculate compensation is “wrenching”. This is not the case as the money that they were allotted is an estimate of the amount that their loved ones would have acquired over the course of their

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    They are focused on maximum wealth, not the individual. It is great for the economy, but in the case of a person’s well-being, it is not the best. Insurance companies, run by corporations, are in charge of a person’s life, someone who has a family, a life can be torn up and thrown away, because some greedy person wanted to save a piece of green paper. A piece of paper, well torn up jeans, rules our lives, rules the world. We as humans are willing to ruin families and will not bat an eyelash, because they may not meet the requirements for insurance.…

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    This makes sense because one would think a higher salary equals a higher standard of living, but sadly this is not the case. As stated in the article “Federal Minimum Wage” there is “no evidence that it reduces poverty”. Over and over again economists agree that a minimum wage hurts those whom it is trying to help. Raising the minimum wage will by no means help a jobless individual with no work experience, but rather make it even harder for them to find employment. The 1923 supreme court decision, Adkins v. Children's Hospital challenged the good and purpose of public policy, which was in fact preventing inferior workers from having a job, even though it's intent was to help them.…

    • 1260 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Why are you giving me less money than the banker who represented Enron?, Why are you demeaning the memory of my husband?”(66).Our government bases the value of life in a monetary value based on an economical scale. Life shouldn’t have a price based on the money you made your whole life or earned, it should be based on what you brought to this world. In fact life should not have a monetary value at all and this financial help from the government should not define how much your family member is worth. The way they calculate life depends on financial circumstances of the victim. In the article, “How much Do I Need?” by a website called Human Life Value Calculator, it shows that the value of life is not based on who is worth more but it is based on financial income.…

    • 1909 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    On the living situation side, the argument is that the government will supply less money to single mothers if there is a so called “step-father” or male figure living with the family. The message shown through this particular argument is that there is no way of telling whether or not this male figure is providing for this family or not since technically, it is not his family. Government investigation is very necessary is this situation because if this male is providing for the family and the “single” mother is collecting welfare, then they are easily taking free money they do not need from the government. The mother is collecting as a single mother when rally she is receiving money on the other hand from a man she is with. A senior at Allegheny College, Naisy Flannery states her opinion in an interview, “I think the ways people are finding…

    • 1718 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    According to Lapham, America must judge these people as both “good and wise”, and he hints we think this way regardless of the person’s behavior. In Lapham’s thoughts sadness of the loss of money is outrageous, he refers that our “happiness” is merely fictional. In this thought, Lapham implies that Americans live with some kind of synthetic happiness, a façade of some sort, tricking the United States minds by thinking money expose ones happiness. The statement though out “the American faith in money” has not statements by Americans of how they feel about money. It also has not facts proving other counties like Ancient Greek, France, Germany and England see Americans as one minded, self-centered people.…

    • 1645 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The U.S. has its fair share of low educated, low income, high welfare use individuals but the U.S. would not benefit from adding to the problem by allowing less educated illegal immigrants to stay. Advocates of Amnesty claim doing analysis by household is not accurate because the children were American born. They argue that the costs for education, welfare, and other programs that benefit children should not be counted because these children are not immigrants. The number of illegal immigrant children add up being that 80 percent were born in the United States. Skeptics completely ignore the fact that they would not be here if it were not for our broken immigration system.…

    • 1437 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Illegal Immigration Cons

    • 1649 Words
    • 7 Pages

    That tax money is used to help our social security system and other government programs but they are not entitled to use those benefits. With they billions, they pay in taxes they are only entitled to free schooling and emergency healthcare. Many of those families struggle to put food on the table for their family but the government won’t give them food stamps because they are not citizens but want them to pay taxes. The system the U.S. government has in place is unfair and need to be changed. If they have to pay taxes they should be able to use all the benefits they are paying for.…

    • 1649 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Try paying fair wages and tax´´, by Peter Wilby, 2010. The text is about the bad side of the rich people and what cons there is about donating to these organizations. They donate to get around the tax, and when they donate they market their product and get even more money. They donate to show a good example of themselves, but they will not help their workers, and give them better work environment. They are trying to avoid taxes and even though they donate their money, they will still be rich.…

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    As stated above immigrants are paying a lot of money towards taxes and they’re getting nothing in return.Yet they’re considered the bad people and even if they are not legal they are still helping out some Americans don’t even do that. Therefore, society should not view immigrants as dangerous…

    • 1895 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    These state taxes somehow imply that even though Americans who make “so little as to be excused from national taxes may still be struggling to make ends meet” (Mitchell). It is clear that keeping the tax rate of the middle class down does not exactly relieve the struggle of the American poor. Overall, by fixing many loopholes in the tax system above, America can have a more efficient and effective system, or perhaps “leaving more room to reduce the impact on the group of Americans being most affected by taxes” (Mitchell). In addition, the government should stop favoring the rich because they just potentially produce more inequality for everyone by giving more decisive benefits for the rich…

    • 1979 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays