• Home Page
  • What Is A Contract Between Chesneys And Stevens

What Is A Contract Between Chesneys And Stevens

Decent Essays
Show More
1. Yes, they are entitled for their work done. Even though there wasn’t any type of contract between the Chesneys and Stevens, Stevens was aware of the work that the Chesneys were doing and according to the theory of a Quasi-contract they should receive a compensation for their work. It would be unjust that Steven keep all the benefits from Chesneys’ work and don’t payed them anything.
2. Since it was a contract between Tindall and Konitz and Konitz agrees to pay Tindall $138,629 for his services, Tindall could sued files against Konitz for refusing to respond to the contract.
3. Yes, they may stay because the Tufte family accepted the Travelers offer within the deadline established.
4. The common Law will apply to Sal’s proposal because

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Ronald Vaden V
    • 904 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Ronald Vaden V

    Case Name and Citation NUNN vs. MASSACHUSETTS CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY 743 F.3d 365 (2014) Court of Appeals Second Circuit Summary of the Key Facts in the Case Ronald Nunn and Donald Vaden are former National Basketball Association referees. In September 1996, both plaintiffs were taking part in a referee training camp that was located in New Jersey and attended a union meeting that was hosted by the National Basketball Referees Association.…

    • 904 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Audio Visual Artistry V. Tanzer Case Summary
    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Audio Visual Artistry V. Tanzer Case Summary

    Case Brief 1 Audio Visual Artistry v. Tanzer 403 S.W. 3d 789 (Tenn. App. 2012) Audio Visual Artistry (AVA) is a firm that primarily focuses on custom design products. Civilian Stephen Tanzer and AVA entered into a contract where AVA would install a “smart-home” system (home theatre, controllable lighting, intercom, phones, music and television in multiple rooms) in the home Tanzer was having constructed. The contract detailed that, initially, the “smart-home” additions would include the ability to play music in seven different sections of the house, remote control panels would control the media systems and other “smart-home” functions, the house would be outfitted with an automated light system, and a house networking system would be integrated. The contract’s initial price detailed for this work totaled to 71,915 USD.…

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Yoely Brach Case Summary
    • 1247 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Yoely Brach Case Summary

    Honorable Judge Schmidt: We are confused and baffled by Isaac Oberlander’s demands and ultimatums. Firstly, let us set the record straight: Yoely Brach (“Yoely”) is the defendant and should not dictate the terms of any arbitration proceedings. The fact remains that Mr. Jacob Guttman, the owner of Court Street Office Supplies, Inc. (“Company”), employed Yoely – right out of Kollel with no formal or general education – out of kindheartedness and compassion to his son-in-law. As Yoely mistook his father-in-law’s unselfishness for weakness, he engaged in erratic behavior, breached his fiduciary duties to the Company, and embezzled the Company by hundreds of thousands of dollars.…

    • 1247 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    South Delaware Coors Inc
    • 1463 Words
    • 6 Pages

    South Delaware Coors Inc

    Case Summary Larry Brownlow was a full time student who would be completing a MBA soon. Larry decided to pursue a MBA because he wanted to become business owner. He had a trust worth $500,000 that would be dispersed to him once he turns 30. Larry was given the opportunity to apply for a Coors beer distributorship. Larry had to determine if purchasing the distributorship is a sound business decision before he applies.…

    • 1463 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Charter Bank Case
    • 1773 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Charter Bank Case

    Holly Hill issued a promissory note for the mortgage to Rogers and Blythe, a couple of months later Rogers and Blythe took out a loan from Charter Bank of Gainesville. In order for Rogers and Blythe to secure the loan they took out from Charter Bank they had to transfer the promissory note they had created with Holly Hill. Sometime later Rogers and Blythe defaulted on the loan. Charter Bank sued in order to recover on the Holly Hill’s promissory note.…

    • 1773 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Case Study: Barco Auto Vs. PSI Cosmetics
    • 1283 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Case Study: Barco Auto Vs. PSI Cosmetics

    Third, on September 27, 1982, PSI Cosmetics (defendant), leased a vehicle from Barco Auto (plaintiff). PSI stated that two months later the engine began to smoke and was towed to an authorized dealer. The dealer took over three months to repair a blown motor. The defendants continued making their payments, even though, they had no use of the vehicle. Mr. Golumbia was advised after 300 to 600 miles, he should have the vehicle serviced (retorqued).…

    • 1283 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Decent Essays

    Arturo Garcia V. Mary Chavez Case Study
    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Arturo Garcia V. Mary Chavez Case Study

    To: Supervising Attorney From: Heather Wells, Student Date: January 31, 2016 Case: Arturo Garcia v Mary Chavez Re: Child support modification Statement of Assignment: I have been asked to prepare a memorandum for you regarding the following questions a. “Was it permissible for Ms. Chavez to unilaterally reduce support when the oldest child reached the age of majority?” b. “What is the likelihood of the court granting a modification of child support due to Ms. Chavez’s change of occupation? Issue: Under Statutory Laws: a. “NMSA § 28-6-1 (Repl.…

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    Psy 230 Week 4
    • 1820 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Psy 230 Week 4

    This case has multiple issues that need to be discussed and clarified. First of all, Cory advances an advertisement regarding selling his computer. He then affirms that the binding will start according to the date of the acceptance. His first offer comes by email, but encounters some faults that delay its arrival. The email is followed by a fax that counter-offers the initial proposed price.…

    • 1820 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Romanelli Inc. Case Summary
    • 548 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Romanelli Inc. Case Summary

    This case involves three parties Romanelli Inc. as principal, Schor accountant and financial adviser as agent and Citibank as a third party. It must be decided whom is liability for actions made by Schor. This case addresses the following legal issues; Authority, Authority branch of agency law, Criminal Law, Third Party Liability, and Vicariously Tort Liability. Relevant social issues involved. Standards must be in place to aid society.…

    • 548 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Collateral Estoppel Case
    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Collateral Estoppel Case

    Prior to a foreclosure sale, “a party to the lien instrument . . . may file in [a foreclosure] action a motion to stay the sale of the property and dismiss the foreclosure action.” Md. Rule 14-211(a)(1) ; Thomas, supra, 427 Md. at 444 n.5.…

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Circuit Court Case Study
    • 627 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Circuit Court Case Study

    On June 1, 2012, Wilson-Gaskins, pro se, filed a complaint in the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County against Kaye, Kaye’s professional liability insurer, and GEICO, alleging that they had engaged in “legal malpractice, retaliation and collusion.” Thereafter, Wilson-Gaskins retained counsel, venue was transferred to Montgomery County, and GEICO and Kaye’s professional liability insurer were dismissed from the action. In an amended complaint, Wilson-Gaskins asserted that Kaye’s breach of his professional duty of care constituted professional negligence and a breach of contract.…

    • 627 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Brook Ross Two Sisters Two Americas Analysis
    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Brook Ross Two Sisters Two Americas Analysis

    In the article, “Two Sisters, Two Americas” Brooke Ross informs us on how being a citizen or being an illegal immigrant in America can make a big difference. Brook Ross writes how the two sisters, Diana and Veronica Saravia, explain the difficulties when one sister is a U.S. citizen while the other isn’t. Veronica (21) was born in El Salvador and was brought to the U.S. illegally as a child. Meanwhile, Diana (14) was born in Maryland, which makes her a U.S. citizen.…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    The Importance Of The Texas Legislature
    • 2562 Words
    • 11 Pages

    The Importance Of The Texas Legislature

    The committee can either determine to go further with the bill or completely get rid of it.(Governing Texas, Pg.…

    • 2562 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Promissory Estoppel Essay
    • 707 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Promissory Estoppel Essay

    This essay seeks to discuss the Doctrine of Promissory Estoppel and the Doctrine of Consideration, as well as a clear analysis, with the use of case law, how Promissory Estoppel has become an exception to the general principle that a promise may only be enforced if it is supported by good consideration; it will ultimately conclude whether or not a promise to accept a smaller sum in discharge of a larger sum, if acted upon, is binding notwithstanding the absence of consideration. A contract is a legally binding agreement in law between two or more parties, which is enforced by law or by binding arbitration if it covers the elements of a valid legal agreement. For there to be a valid contract, three elements must be present, offer, acceptance, and consideration. If there is no consideration, there is no contract; however, with promissory estoppel instead of consideration, if there is a promise which induces reliance, the court would find some sort of liability for the promise.…

    • 707 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    The Case Of Gibson Vs. Storer V Manchester City Council
    • 1534 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Case Of Gibson Vs. Storer V Manchester City Council

    Contracts are an integral part of society, having strong legal contractual principles gives confidence to consumers, investors and anyone who wishes to enter into a contract. Entering in a contract shows that in a primitive way that two parties are on the same page, however it is noted that a high proportion of litigation does actually stem from misunderstood contract (Duxbury (2011)).In this scenario Gary believes he has a valid contract with Mike and is disappointed to learn that Mike has sold on the Bike to Liz (third party). Using previous cases as precedent and analysing the conditions in which a contract is made, advice will be given to Gary on his legal position in regards to the contract and whether there is any suitable remedy that…

    • 1534 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More

Related Topics

Ready To Get Started?
Discover
Company
Follow
©2024 Cram.com
Privacy Policy |  About Ads |  Site Map |  Advertise  | 
  • Cookie Settings