What Is A Ban Argue That It Is Necessary For The Protection Of Non Smokers

2. Proponents of a ban argue that it is necessary for the protection of non-smokers, who may become ill from second-hand smoke. However, this argument fails. Scientific evidence of harm from second-hand smoke is very flimsy. People who live with heavy smokers for many years may have a slightly higher risk of cancer, and it is true that smoky environments are unpleasant for non-smokers. However, there simpler and easier solutions to these problems – separate smoking rooms in offices and airports, for