New Zealand Constitutional System Essay

Superior Essays
To what extent has history affected New Zealand’s current constitutional system? First and foremost, a constitution is a compact document that comprises a number of articles about the State, laying down rules which State activities are supposed to follow. New Zealand constitution does not consist of a single document, unlike The United States. Instead has a form of an unwritten constitution consisting of legislation, cases, legal documents, and common law. History is one of the most important factors when it comes to the shaping the New Zealand constitutional system.

The Manga Carta is a very important document when looking at the separation of powers. New Zealand is a commonwealth country so our entire legal system is based on England’s law including common law. The Manga Carta was created during the reign of King John the first, in the 13th century and signed on the 15 of June 1215. King John was taxing his barons heavily to pay for his elaborate
…show more content…
The constitution act can be overridden the act is not the supreme law like it is the United States where no law can override the Constitution, their Constitution is the supreme law. It took a long time for New Zealand to gain parliamentary sovereignty. The Constitution Act of 1852 gave the New Zealand colony a representative government. The government still had to subordinate to the governor. It was not until 25 September 1907 the New Zealand that we became a dominion. The constitutional crisis of 1984 had created sparked a review of the New Zealand Constitution Act, 1852 and lead to the crisis lead to the creation of the Constitution Act of 1986. The Constitution act legally separated the UK from New Zealand formally stated as The United Kingdom shall cease to have effect as part of the law of New Zealand The Sovereign or the head of state of New Zealand is still whoever the ruling monarchy (Queen Elisabeth II)

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    How Did The Constitution Guard Against Tyranny? We all know the story of how the 13 colonies broke away from the British Monarchy. We know of the wars fought by brave soldiers and the deaths that bloodied the very ground we walk upon. We know of the great leaders that lead us towards the road of freedom, But not many of us know at what great lengths those very leaders took to make this new land different from the british Monarchy.…

    • 373 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Larry Sabato, an American political scientist who graduated from the University of Oxford, recommends a new constitutional convention to revise the current United States constitution to change all three branches of government. The proposals Sabato is offering do not do any good, as this paper proves later. Constitutional amendments can be great in cases like the 14th or 21st, but these proposals would not do anything like that . Sabato’s opinion on how to revise the judicial branch by increasing the number of Supreme Court justices from nine to twelve and adding a Balanced Budget amendment to prevent any deficit spending are good ideas in theory, but in reality, neither would work.…

    • 1870 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Constitution Act of 1982 transferred the authority to amend the Constitution from Great Britain to Canada. To date, Quebec’s constitutional concerns have not been addressed to a great enough extent, according to the government or the residence, to formally pass consent on the 1982 Constitution. This is largely due to the distinctiveness of the society of Quebec originating from the largely French speaking population, the resilient cultural identity, as well as history, political, and social traditions, that are more or less not shared with the rest of Canada The question in concern is whether or not Canada’s Constitution should recognize the francophone population in Quebec as a ‘nation’ with characteristics and needs palpably different from those of other provinces in the Canadian federation. The problem has been tackled on a number of occasions but has yet to be resolved.…

    • 1267 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    ‘The Australian Constitution is outdated and is in need of urgent reform’ Introduction The Australian constitution are a set of rules in which Australia is governed. It was drafted as a series of conventions which was held in the 1890s. The constitution was passed by the British Parliament as part of the Commonwealth of australia constitution Act 1900 which took effect on january 1 on 1901. The constitution are voted by the people in a series of referendums and created the composition of the australian parliament, it shows how the parliament works, what power it has, power sharing between the federal and state parliaments and also the role high court and executive.…

    • 628 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Us Constitution Dbq

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages

    United States Constitution Before there was even a constitution to amend and abide by, the United States government followed the Articles of Confederation. After years of the system’s lack of efficiency, the constitution was created. The constitution was a new system of necessary laws that limited governmental power and distributed it among the states. It played a major role in the lives of past Americans and continues to do so today.…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    On the federal level, the Constitution set a division among the executive, legislative, and judicial branches; locally the government must be granted permission by the state and the governing bodies are directly elected by the people. In total it left the maximum amount of freedom in the hands of individuals. This being said, a common concern among many in today’s society is whether or not a document that was written 229 years ago can still remain relevant in a world that is frequently changing. The Constitutions relevancy is based on the fact that it is a living document written with the possibility of amendments that allows for interpretation by the judicial system, that its purpose is to protect against dictatorship and usurping of power brought up by Anti-Federalist fears, and that it ultimately serves as a protective barrier for citizens’ civil…

    • 1481 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    1.0 Introduction As a nation, Australians have become a unique group of individuals, vastly different from the British who settled in this country. Australia is a multicultural continent with its own laws, constitution and systems, so why should Australians still be a part of the constitutional monarchy under Britain? Why should it not become a republic, and increase its independence? This report will investigate the currant system Australia operates under, and the suggestions that have been made in the past to change to a republic, to come to a conclusion on whether or not Australia should become a republic, or remain a constitutional monarchy.…

    • 1585 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    What was once “regarded as the mixture of law, custom, conventions of governance and institutions existing at any one moment” were instead “charters creating institutions that would henceforth act under the authority they bestowed.” Under this view, constitutions were now the law of the land, even placing it above the highest official in the government. Because of this, any law enacted by the government had to fall under the guidelines of the Constitution, and if the law were to fall outside the guidelines, it could be deemed unconstitutional. In “Four Letters Interesting Subjects”, the author attempts to define the word constitution. The author states that constitutions serve two main purposes: 1) to decide what the form of government should be and 2) what powers should the government have.…

    • 1544 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    As Boyd (2015) explains, constitutional law is special in that it cannot be subjected to alteration through “the mere passage of new law through the House of Commons and the Senate” (p. 98). On the surface, this fact appears to guarantee respect for the authority of the rights laid out in the Constitution. This is significant because constitutional law supposedly, in the words of Cheffins and Tucker (as cited in Boyd, 2015), is a “mirror reflecting the national soul” (p. 98). However, many reject the claim that the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms [hereinafter, Charter] has brought about greater respect for fundamental rights and freedoms.…

    • 2000 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The argument made by Jack N. Rakove in his essay, “The Hope of the Framers to Recruit Citizens to Enter Public Life,”1 was more convincing than that made by Alfred F. Young in “The Pressure of the People on the Framers of the Constitution. ”2 Young focuses on the different motivations of the framers, while the point that Rakove is trying to make is how the framers of the Constitution of the United States3 , regardless of motivation, sought to include the common people in the affairs of the government by making political office accessible to citizens. The Constitution is designed to provide United States citizens an opportunity to run for office regardless of social standing, the balance of powers contained within prevent any one person or group…

    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1. Describe some of the principles behind the Constitution. Discuss how the separation of powers and checks and balances are supposed to operate. How did the Constitution arrange the power relationships between the national government and the states? There are several principles behind the United States constitution, such as popular sovereignty, limited government, separation of power, checks and balances, and federalism.…

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Annexation Of Hawaii Essay

    • 1166 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Queen did not agree with the Constitution that was forced upon her brother and sought to change it. She wanted to make a new Constitution that gave power back to the Monarchy and help the Hawaiian Natives. The Hawaiian people were largely on her side with the majority of them opposing the Annexation. “To his excellency William McKinley, President, and The Senate of the United States...we the undersigned, Native Hawaiian Citizens, and residents of the District of Honolulu, Island of Oahu...earnestly protest against the annexation of the said Hawaiian Islands to the said United Sates of America in any form or shape." (1897 Petition Against the Annexation of…

    • 1166 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Constitution was drafted in 1787 and ratified by the states in 1789. In the Case of Marybury v. Madison, the Supreme Court ruled that it had powers to interpret the Constitution. According to legal resources, constitutional law deals with the fundamental principles by which the regime exercises its ascendancy. In some instances, these principles grant concrete powers to the regime, such as the puissance to tax and spend for the welfare of the population. Other times, constitutional principles act to place limits on what the regime can do, such as enjoining the apprehending of an individual without sufficient cause.…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Are here any limits on the principle of Parliamentary Sovereignty? In answering this question, I will first set out a traditional definition of Parliamentary sovereignty. I will then consider two different senses in which it might be said that there are limits on Parliament’s sovereignty.…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The ‘separation of powers’ is a doctrine that has caused much debate through the centuries, and although it is difficult to find its exact origins, it is possible to distinguish a basic separation of powers doctrine from the writings of Greek philosopher Aristotle. He remarked that a constitution must have three elements to be effective. The three are, first the deliberative, which discusses everything of common importance; second, the officials…; and third, the judicial element. The English political theorist, John Locke, conceived a similar idea about the different types of power.…

    • 1162 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays