History has always prevailed itself by showing people fighting over territorial sanctions, ideas revolving around politics as well as the simplicity of faith itself. It’s these motions ad violence that affect us as humans. It greatly impacts the ideology of political and economical interest to society today, a pursuit that radicalizes a forth coming of how wars will leave a rationalized foot print in history to come. Through wars one is able to assert their dominance and through that one is able to force ideas and beliefs. To some, war represents a rational pursuit to gain economic interests, while for others it remains an irrational destruction of property and futures to others.…
The Product of Fear War is one of the inevitable consequences of the fall of man. Fear is a major factor in beginning this mass conflict, called war. Elie Wiesel the author of the autobiography, Night includes a statement in his book of the fear he experienced when he was surviving the Holocaust, “I was the accuser, God the accused. My eyes had opened and I was alone, terribly alone in a world without God, without man” (68). This quote or statement from his book discusses fear as controlling his belief in God and doubting his survival.…
Rhetoric Countering War Throughout history, war has become the only solution to resolving conflicts between nations or groups. War is often something that is started off with tension, tension which is often caused or started due to conflicts or disagreements between different nations or different groups, and it is commonly characterized by violence, resistance, and mortality. A few examples in American history are the American-Indian Wars and the Revolutionary War. These various groups of people firmly believed that the only way they could advocate for what they were passionate in was to use violence to express it. However, in the first chapter of Everyone’s An Author, Wayne Booth takes another perspective into consideration and is quoted,…
I enjoyed reading your discussion, you summarized the arguments that Hedges made in this writing and speech. I completely agree that there are alternatives to avoid the bloody wars. Conflicts may remain in the society, but CAR should put more efforts in nonviolent resolution of any sort conflict. Hedges arguments about myth of war would be very important understanding for the conflict resolution, because we have seen war as victory, glory, and manhood; however, we never looked back the reality in the field. I do have a lot of respect to our military, who fought for our nation, but the main issue is our war policies, which causes thousands of death, injury, and loss of cultural heritages.…
I believe T.H's White's book is not a condemnation of war for whatever reasons, but rather more of several specific reasons. Generally, war is something usually looked negatively upon, however the point is White doesn't express his disapproving views on it just because it was bad, but rather expresses his own personal views since he lived throughout a war (WWII). To understand his view you would have to know the history of WWII. There were many things going on during period, countries as the United States and Great Britain were forced to take extraordinary actions such as monitoring civilian life/communications and civil rights were suspended since the government suspected disloyalty. On the other hand, countries such as Russia, Nazi Germany,…
Ever since, the dawn of man war has been a part of man’s culture. War has been both vital and fatal to the survival of many cultures in the world. But, when the powers that oversee force people that they have ignored and quelled for many years to fight a war against people who pose no threat to them then problems emerge. The real purpose of war from the attacker’s viewpoint is not to protect an idea or defend the innocent from evil, the real purpose is to secure the resources that the territory possesses no matter who is invading. The Vietnam war is the perfect example of this, where the USA who was all about democracy and freedom had a dictator in South Vietnam make sure that the resources of the land got to the United States.…
1A Aquinas’ three conditions that make war “just” are: Proper authority, Just cause, and the right intention (PP. 4). The first condition states that war can only be declared by the highest authority in government, the head of state. The purpose of declaring war is to give the other state a chance to make peace. If the parties involved are not able to reach a peaceful settlement, then the head of state of of the second nation must refuse to resolve. At this point, both sides have tried to come to peace and haven’t and are aware that war is coming.…
War has ended the persecution of other for centuries. The importance of war is shown by the freedom of those around you and abroad. Without war countries would be nothing but colonies, ruled by a more powerful nation with an iron fist. Different races would no longer exist because nothing would be done to help them. War is what keeps tyranny and persecution in check.…
Purpose. War. Peace. Family. The reasons why something is done or created with one’s intention or an objective.…
It could start because of conflicting religions or it could be a revolution to rid of an oppressive government. However, in Ishmael, war is found throughout the book as a blunt teaching device by Ishmael as he uses it to show how selfish man can be in war. Whether it’s Hitler’s propaganda in WWII to control the Germans, or references…
2. I believe that there are a few reasons a war would be considered just. A fight for freedom and independence from a tyrannical government that is oppressing its people would be a valid reason to wage war. I also…
Introduction Many understand the fact that war is rarely ever justifiable and that the idea…
In “Rationalist Explanations for War,” James Fearon argues that due to war’s costly nature and states’ risk-averse, or at least risk-neutral, tendencies, there should always exist some possible prewar agreement between two disputing states that both parties would prefer to achieve over committing to war. While seeking to reveal his main claim that war is caused by information problems, commitment problems, and issue indivisibilities, Fearon critiques five traditional Neorealist explanations of war: anarchy, positive expected utility, preventive war, lack of information, and miscalculation of relative power. Although Fearon’s critique of the majority of these theories are earnest and do expose multiple logical shortcomings, his rapid dismissal…
If someone is in danger or they feel threatened, is war necessary? Some people believe it is, but others believe it is not. is sometimes preferred because some countries don’t respond to just talking. Also, some countries might start war on our country, so war is necessary to stop them. For example with North Korea, they do not respond to talking and threaten the United States with nuclear threats, talking with them will not work and could just result to an attack on the U.S. War is oftentimes necessary because sometimes violence is necessary, there are positives to declaring war, and it can get things done faster.…
Think about it this way , war is not justifiable . Would you stand by and watch while your family and country are being attacked by a formidable force to bodily and deadly harm ? Or would you fight back ? How could you fight back ? War is not justifiable to remember .…