The first point Kohn discusses is the point of schooling. Kohn begins his argument with asking about the purpose of education and concludes that it should be “to produce competent, caring, loving, and lovable people.” This point is substantial because it implies that the focus of schooling and education should be about creating the individualities of people rather than only focusing on academic excellence and how well students perform during tests and exams.
The second point Kohn discusses is evaluating people vs. their education. Kohn begins his argument by asking the reader if whether being well-educated refers to the quality of the schooling you receive or to something about you. This point is significant because Kohn is proposing that the term well educated cannot be defined based on the education …show more content…
Kohn begins this point by asking the reader if “it is possible to agree on a single definition of what every high school student should know or be able to do in order to be considered well educated”. Kohn implies this point by making a comparison between what it means to be well educated across cultures and subcultures, such as the United States and South-Central Los Angeles. Kohn then concludes his argument by saying “it is misleading and even dangerous to justify our own pedagogical values by pretending they are grounded in some objective, transcendent Truth…” This statement is important because the definition of being well-educated is different in every place. Therefore, it cannot be defined as a single