When I read the book I thought, “This seems like an interesting book.” In addition to my claim the Diary was interesting at some entries and some specific moments but others were about what the characters were doing in the attic.Now that I think of it Anne Frank’s Diary isn't great because she died in the end or because it's great creative writing it interests me because of what she went through during the Holocaust. Now I'm not saying she had it the worst it's just that Anne Frank had some circumstances that most people wouldn't agree to live in that time period so Anne’s Diary interested me in what happened to people who were in hiding. …show more content…
For example a critic, Dana Sachs, said “Elie Wiesel’s novel, like Anne Frank’s Diary, has a plainness to its prose. Neither is great literature. They lack the descriptive style that makes a scene come alive.” Also another critic stated, “ I had viewed her book as the innocent and spontaneous outpourings of a teenager.” These comments I almost agree with them, I only agree to the Diary it had some plainness and I do agree that the Diary is outpourings of a teenager. It's just that they dig really deep into what they think the book is to them rather than what the book is actually