Introduction
At one point, you are going to come across the three chronic ailments in life. They are unavoidable. The three chronic ailments of life are death, futility, and suffering. Three of the many solutions made up for these three things are going to be talked about. Stoicism, Skepticism, and life after death are few solutions offered to these ailments. However, do these ideas provide us any logical answers to death, futility, and suffering?
Stoicism
Stoicism is an ancient Greek solution that means to be withdrawn from a situation indifferently. Stoics accept the fact that our existence life has been destined for everyone. Stoicism can be considered a detachable way of thinking.
Stoicism does not solve the problem of death. However, Stoicism could help ease the anxiety of death. Since Stoics …show more content…
Whatever kind of afterlife you believe in, there is no way that it will ease the suffering. Suffering is something that inevitable in our lives. If you believe in the reward system of life after death, then maybe you might feel as though the suffering could eventually be worth it in the end.
Futility is an internal abyss that is hard to fulfill, and life after death is not something I believe will fill that. Life after death does not give your present life that you have now any meaning. I cannot think of life after death being something that gives your life any profit.
Conclusion
Creating ideas like Stoicism, skepticism, and life after death are merely only to ease the pain on obstacles with struggle with in life. I believe everyone is entitled to their opinion and I am entitled to mine, and I feel that the meaning of life will never be defined logically. I think that solutions for ailments are accurately created and it takes great faith to remain steady in those solutions. In closure of this topic, the meaning of life is an idea that will be tossed around until time
At one point, you are going to come across the three chronic ailments in life. They are unavoidable. The three chronic ailments of life are death, futility, and suffering. Three of the many solutions made up for these three things are going to be talked about. Stoicism, Skepticism, and life after death are few solutions offered to these ailments. However, do these ideas provide us any logical answers to death, futility, and suffering?
Stoicism
Stoicism is an ancient Greek solution that means to be withdrawn from a situation indifferently. Stoics accept the fact that our existence life has been destined for everyone. Stoicism can be considered a detachable way of thinking.
Stoicism does not solve the problem of death. However, Stoicism could help ease the anxiety of death. Since Stoics …show more content…
Whatever kind of afterlife you believe in, there is no way that it will ease the suffering. Suffering is something that inevitable in our lives. If you believe in the reward system of life after death, then maybe you might feel as though the suffering could eventually be worth it in the end.
Futility is an internal abyss that is hard to fulfill, and life after death is not something I believe will fill that. Life after death does not give your present life that you have now any meaning. I cannot think of life after death being something that gives your life any profit.
Conclusion
Creating ideas like Stoicism, skepticism, and life after death are merely only to ease the pain on obstacles with struggle with in life. I believe everyone is entitled to their opinion and I am entitled to mine, and I feel that the meaning of life will never be defined logically. I think that solutions for ailments are accurately created and it takes great faith to remain steady in those solutions. In closure of this topic, the meaning of life is an idea that will be tossed around until time