Checks And Balances In The United States

Better Essays
The United States government has three branches; legislative, executive, and judicial. The founding fathers created these branches in order to separate power. During our founding, our founding fathers feared a tyrannical government so they put into place a set of checks and balances in order to prevent one from forming. Checks and balances are when one branch of government doesn 't let another get too powerful. There are several examples of this but to put it simply, there is a set amount of power and all three branches has to get that power from the same set amount. I will go on later and show examples of the checks each branch has on the others. Naturally, each branch wants more power but in order to get it, they have to take it from another …show more content…
Congress can check the president 's power by stopping funding, the power of the purse is in congress 's hands since they control the budget. The president can veto (or tell congress no) a law if he doesn 't agree but congress can override a veto with a 2/3rd majority. The president can also go by congress with an executive order but congress can override his order with their own law. Now once a law is in place the supreme court can say if that law is unconstitutional but only if a citizen sues the country and brings the case all the way to the supreme court. The president 's only check on them is that if they are missing a justice he is the one to appoint them, but the senate has to approve his nomination. As you can see there are several checks on the branches except on the judicial branch, mostly because before it was given the power of judicial review it was the weakest branch and didn 't need the checks on its …show more content…
The single greatest power the court has is something it gave itself in the Marbury v Madison. During this case, Chief Justice John Marshall said that a law was unconstitutional and the court can 't obey it because of that sole reason. Marbury was a man who was appointed as judge during John Adams term as president, himself and many others were appointed the night before in a last ditch effort to let the Federalist (one of the main political parties of the time) keep some power since a Democrat-Republican (the other main political party of the time) was coming into office of president, but the papers giving him the position were not given in time. So when Thomas Jefferson took office he didn 't give out the papers, in order to prevent more Federalist from taking power. At the time the supreme court had the power to issue an order making elected officials comply with their demands. Marbury wanted the court to issue an order from Jefferson to give him his papers saying he was a judge. John Marshall decides that it was unconstitutional for the court to do that and said it was no longer a law. Unknowingly he created judicial review, by trying to protect the constitution he created something unintentionally to decide what it says. This gives the court so much power because they not only decide what a law says but also what the constitution says. They are now the referees to make sure everyone, including themselves,

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    A power that every President has used since our first President George Washington called executive orders. This power is a primary use by the president, although state governors have it as one of their governing powers. Presidents have taken of advantage of this to get around congress to make laws and decision that congress doesn’t want to. Is this something that the Executive branch has too much power the answer no; it’s not because the orders work like laws being put into effect. If it’s found unconstitutional the Supreme Court can say no to law and reinterpret it.…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Not only that, but this weakens the participation that the citizens get to have in the government itself. One of the main ideas that our founding fathers based the Constitution on was to give the people more power and say in what happens in order to balance the power more efficiently and prevent tyranny. This whole process of the people not getting to pick the judges overrides that idea. The President already has enough power, giving them this power could potentially cause a mess within the cabinet. It makes it easier for the President to do illegal activity because he could choose who was below…

    • 1094 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The 14th Amendment

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Section 1 (a) the executive branch may veto legislation and may call special sessions of congress the legislative may override a president’s veto, may impeach the president, approves appointment's of judges and approves treaties (b) the framers intentions were to keep any branch of government from having too much power and the checks and balances make their intentions possible. 2. 1. (a) skipped (b) it basically means that the law must be obeyed no matter what and no one is immune to the law also it means no one man has more power than the law. 3.…

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The separation of power is made up of three branches; which are Legislative (congress) branch, Executive (presidential) branch and Judicial (Supreme Court) branch. However, it’s difficult because checks and balance must occur. For instants the president can pardon whoever they want, and may veto in other words block laws that is passed by Congress. But Congress can still pass laws if and when a vote of two-thirds of both houses succeeds. The Supreme Court can check Congress by stating that a law unconstitutional.…

    • 1772 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The legislative branch has the power to control tax and money, while the executive branch can make law and control the army. It would be overpowered if they would give them the power to overturn the unconstitutional federal law. It’s unfair to give the legislature judicial review. Each branch should have their power. No other branches act will go against the constitution is acceptable.…

    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    A writ of mandamus is a specific court order because it is made without the benefit of the judicial process or before a case has contemplated. It may be expressed by a court at any time that it is appropriate. Usually, it is issued in a case that has already started. (Eric Foner and John A. Garraty) The Supreme had announced for the very first time that a law had been passed by Congress and had been signed by the President unconstitutionally; after John Marshall, Chief Justice, wrote: “A Law repugnant to the Constitution is void.” However, Marshall believed that the Supreme Court should have an equal role to the other two branches of the government. (Milestone Documents in the National Archives) John Jay, Alexander Hamilton, and Jams Madison gave the executive and legislative branches powers that would limit each other as well as the judiciary branch.…

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Marbury v. Madison In November 1800 John Adams, President of the United States lost the election to Thomas Jefferson (65 to 39) . He also lost the control of Congress. Adams was a Federalist and Jefferson was Republican. They both believed that victory by the other person will be a disaster for the nation. As one of his last acts, Adams convinced the Congress to pass a new law which will grant him the power to appoint new judges.…

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Impeaching a president was not common and if it was to happen, it will be shocking. It only happened twice in history, the House of Representatives and republican of house voted to impeach president bill Clinton in 1998. He was being accused of lying about having sexual affair with Monica Lewinsky and lied to everybody. The senate was able not reach the 2/3 's majority vote which needed to go through his impeachment so then it acquitted by the Senate which allowed Bill Clinton to remain in office until…

    • 886 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Federalists and the Anti Federalists have different viewpoints on the clauses presented. The federalist paper number 33 presents the argument that the Federal government is granted authority to make all laws that are necessary and proper for the United States. These laws are to be the supreme law of the land. The Antifederalists disagreed with this idea because they believed it would give too much power to the Federal Government leaving the people and the state governments vulnerable. The federalists saw the idea of doing what is necessary and proper for everyone the best possible solution to the United States.…

    • 856 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    They had created the Constitution, but the had one question. How did the constitution guard against tyranny? Tyranny by definition is a person or group from having or getting too much power. They made the constitution prevents this tyranny by having four major ideas. Those ideas are federalism, Separation of powers, checks and balances, and finally equal representation in congress.…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays