What Are The Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing

1611 Words 7 Pages

Many animals are hurt and abused during animal testing. The animals that are tested on usually die off. Cosmetic, medical, chemical, product testing and etc. I believe all testing needs that use animals for testing needs to be banned throughout companies. This testing is usually ran by a series of scientist and researchers, that work for companies that specialize in these cruel activities. Most of the companies can find greater alternatives for the animals that are used, for example the human simulator. The human simulator is a robot that can act like humans, same symptoms to certain chemicals. The human simulator is not 100 % guaranteed yet but neither is the items that we test on animals. Animal testing is very cruel but also the testing …show more content…
Chemical testing especially toxicity testing usually end in death for the animals. Animals that are tested for toxicity can be exposed up to 30,000 chemicals. Exposing animals to chemicals back to back, can defeat the purpose of testing a product. The reaction of a certain product can be delayed because of another chemical that has been used. Many pros and cons to testing on animals. A major con some debate about is a religion factor. God doesn 't want us to abuse the animals and use them to harm. Most would argue we are supposed to care and treat our animals fairly. A major pro that many argue is, it 's either us or them. Many products need to be tested to find out if they are worth using. Companies would rather use animals than use people for the …show more content…
The amount of money used is more than one 's mortgage a year. Alternatives for animal testing are active and just as effective as the animals used to be tested on. Animals are suffering and dying because of the tribulation they face everyday with testing. There is not just one product researchers are testing on the animals, there 's more than 1,000 total. All animals have minds and hearts just like humans, and all deserve to live happy and test free

Animal Experimentation: The Causes And Cons Of Animal Testing

They could get injured, then remain in a cell. Animals could get ill after testing. The humans are risking the animal’s lives during testing and should find another way to do testing.”experiments that subjectly measure the irritations of chemicals in the eyes or on the skin of rabbits, and determine toxicity by the dosage of a chemical that kills half of the animals forced to consume, breathe or be injected with that chemical”(www.navs.org/science/animals-in-product-testing). Most of the chemicals used for testing fails and ends up killing the animal. Scientists would risk a life of an animal in a minute before they would risk a human’s life.…

Words: 1085 - Pages: 5

Alternative Methods: The Dangers Of Animal Testing

Drugs like penicillin and aspirin were toxic to some animals while helpful to humans. The continuous use of animal testing could lead to a decrease in population or cause humans to suffer because of the difference in biological makeup. The alternative methods that have developed through the years should be used over any other method. The alternatives could prevent the loss of lives of innocent animals. The Humane Society International refers to some of the punishments the animals face by saying, “...killing by carbon dioxide asphyxiation, neck-breaking, decapitation, or other means."…

Words: 1076 - Pages: 5

The Alternatives Of Animal Testing

There are a number of cheaper alternatives that many scientists can use to make medical discoveries. “Animal testing is time and resource consuming and cost far more than non-animal testing.” (HIS) Scientists spend billions of dollars per year, just putting animals through procedures that may or may not help advance us in the medical field. The National Cancer Institute had a research budget of over two billion dollars. The National Institute of Health had thirty one billion dollars to fund their cruel and often bizarre experiments that we have known for decades don’t lead to cures for humans. There are different alternatives that can be used, yet there is animal experimentation to this day.…

Words: 1113 - Pages: 5

Why Is Animal Testing A Ethical?

Much of the testing done on animals has flaws in the experiment so it ends up wasting the life of the animal. Medical breakthroughs involving animal research is still possible to happen without doing the tests on the animal itself. “A public outcry over animal testing and the treatment of animals in general broke out in the United States in the mid-1960s, leading to the passage of the AWA. An article in the November 29, 1965 issue of Sports Illustrated about Pepper, a farmer 's pet Dalmation that was kidnapped and sold into experimentation, is believed to have been the initial catalyst for the rise in anti-testing sentiment. Pepper died after researchers attempted to implant an experimental cardiac pacemaker in her body” (“Animal Testing”…

Words: 1187 - Pages: 5

The Importance Of Animal Testing

Animal testing has been a debate for 30 years as the practice raises ethical and moral questions. The debate questions the effectiveness and importance of animal testing. Some support the procedure where others are against. The procedure is supported by some due to the fact that it is more ethically correct to perform testing on animals rather than testing it on human subjects. Others are against this procedure because they believe that animals have rights and they should be protected It is the procedure where animals are used for testing of drugs, cosmetics, food, and chemical testing.…

Words: 981 - Pages: 4

Essay On The Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing

The major negative effect of animal testing is that it's seen as cruel and inhumane. The article “About Animal Testing” written by the Humane Society International states: “Animals are forced chemical exposure in toxicity testing, which can include oral force-feeding, forced inhalation, skin or injection into the abdomen, muscle, etc.” (HSI 1). Many of these animals will die due to the method of which they perform this tests. Another con maybe how animals are very different from human beings and therefore make poor test subjects. The anatomic, metabolic, and cellular differences between animals and people make animals poor models for human beings.…

Words: 1570 - Pages: 7

Is Animal Testing Inhumane Essay

Payton Keife Nick DiMeo English 101 11 November 2017 Is Animal Experimentation Inhumane? Animal experimentation is known and used worldwide; from testing beauty products to medication, thousands of animals are harmed daily by fumes and chemicals, leaving them traumatized. There are many other solutions determining if products are harmful or not, yet, they are rarely used. The use of animals during testing, should most likely be banned and throughout the world, because it has been proven to be less accurate and more harmful. Although animal testing is thought to be “life-saving”, it has also been categorized as inhumane and cruel.…

Words: 945 - Pages: 4

The Pros And Cons Of Animal Experimentation

Some products that have been tested in animals may come out being useless when it comes to working on humans. Accordingly, Vittana.com states, “The FDA estimated that 92% of drugs that pass their pre-clinical tests, including animal research, fail to reach the market. Recent data suggest that failure rates from animal research to human research could be even higher, at 96%, according to the NIH.” · Some items that are worked on and tested on animals end up not being used. § Furthermore, plenty of times, people want to make superior products, killing multiple animals in the process. Overall, these animals are killed and subjected to cruel torture for nothing.…

Words: 2233 - Pages: 9

Pros And Controversies Of Animal Testing

When experimenting on animals they typically only test in the same manner as a human five to twenty five percent of the time (Satchura). Animal testing is not always accurate or beneficial and sometimes it causes more unnecessary suffering of animals. It has been said that around ninety five percent of medicines and drugs that are tested on animals are essentially thrown out because they don’t work on humans (Satchura). It has also been established that animals share some of the same physiological similarities as humans so many animals feel and express pain like humans do (Ferdowsian and Beck). Not only do animals have to suffer from all the medical experimentation, many times it is to no…

Words: 1143 - Pages: 5

Is Animal Testing Justified

The animals are put out of their misery by being killed at the end of the test, but that wouldn’t have to happen if they weren’t put in misery in the first place. Alone in the US there are about 20 million animals used for teaching purposes (Animals Used). That’s more than the population of Florida. “Roughly half of them are killed and used for classroom dissection; others are tormented while they’re still still alive in classroom biology and psychology experiments and act apart in medical training drills.” (Animals used). Animal testing is used mainly for research.…

Words: 1344 - Pages: 6

What Are The Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing

Related Documents

Animal Experimentation: The Causes And Cons Of Animal Testing

Alternative Methods: The Dangers Of Animal Testing

The Alternatives Of Animal Testing

Why Is Animal Testing A Ethical?

The Importance Of Animal Testing

Essay On The Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing

Is Animal Testing Inhumane Essay

The Pros And Cons Of Animal Experimentation

Pros And Controversies Of Animal Testing

Is Animal Testing Justified

Related Topics

Ready To Get Started?

Discover

Company

Follow