There is a highly controversial argument of using animals for scientific or commercial testing. Chimpanzees have 99% of their DNA in common with humans; furthermore, mice are 98% comparable to humans on a genetic level. The United States and Gabon are the main two nations that permit experimentation with chimpanzees (ProCon.org). “95% of animals” utilized in experimentation are not “protected by the federal Animal Welfare Act (AWA), which excludes birds, rats and mice bred for research, and cold-blooded animals such as reptiles and most fish” (ProCon.org). Based on my research and my own personal experience, I found that there are several pros and cons. I believe that this research has good points, but there will always be a controversial
…show more content…
The polio vaccine, after testing in animals, decreased the events of the ailment “from 350,000 cases in 1988 to 223 cases in 2012” (ProCon.org). Trials in which the pancreas of dogs were removed were responsible for the discovery of insulin, which is important for the lives of diabetics (ProCon.org). Experimentation on chimpanzees is also responsible for a hepatitis B vaccine, and researchers are hopeful that similar experiments on chimps can yield a vaccine for hepatitis C (ProCon.org). Thalidomide, used for the treatment and prevention of a skin disease caused by leprosy, caused birth defects and death among infants. However, if tested on animals first, its possibility for making defects might have been found before the medication was approved for human use (ProCon.org). I understand that we need the animals for cures and treatment. This is a good reason to keep using animals for testing of certain medicines that are better with …show more content…
We are basically consuming over 1,800 of pigs then the amount of pigs that are utilized in the research, and eating over 340 chickens for all the research animal (ProCon.org). Individuals in the United States consume 9 billion chickens. Also 150 million cattle, pigs furthermore sheep annually, yet we best use around 26 million animals to research, 95% of which aid rodents, winged creatures and fish (ProCon.org).
I think we should test animals with certain medicines, and there are some that they should never test on any animals. With this argument, there are the same numbers of pros and cons. Animals need to be still be tested on for medicines for illnesses and disabilities. We should use humans for testing medicine, so that fewer animals are killed. There are many people who are against animal testing, but there are people who are for it. One thing that should change is that more animals should be protected by the Animal Welfare Act (AWA), and that if a protected animal is killed, those who caused its death should
The polio vaccine, after testing in animals, decreased the events of the ailment “from 350,000 cases in 1988 to 223 cases in 2012” (ProCon.org). Trials in which the pancreas of dogs were removed were responsible for the discovery of insulin, which is important for the lives of diabetics (ProCon.org). Experimentation on chimpanzees is also responsible for a hepatitis B vaccine, and researchers are hopeful that similar experiments on chimps can yield a vaccine for hepatitis C (ProCon.org). Thalidomide, used for the treatment and prevention of a skin disease caused by leprosy, caused birth defects and death among infants. However, if tested on animals first, its possibility for making defects might have been found before the medication was approved for human use (ProCon.org). I understand that we need the animals for cures and treatment. This is a good reason to keep using animals for testing of certain medicines that are better with …show more content…
We are basically consuming over 1,800 of pigs then the amount of pigs that are utilized in the research, and eating over 340 chickens for all the research animal (ProCon.org). Individuals in the United States consume 9 billion chickens. Also 150 million cattle, pigs furthermore sheep annually, yet we best use around 26 million animals to research, 95% of which aid rodents, winged creatures and fish (ProCon.org).
I think we should test animals with certain medicines, and there are some that they should never test on any animals. With this argument, there are the same numbers of pros and cons. Animals need to be still be tested on for medicines for illnesses and disabilities. We should use humans for testing medicine, so that fewer animals are killed. There are many people who are against animal testing, but there are people who are for it. One thing that should change is that more animals should be protected by the Animal Welfare Act (AWA), and that if a protected animal is killed, those who caused its death should