Pros And Cons On Gun Control

Improved Essays
Gun Control

{Gun Control – Pro}

A criminal breaks into your house. What do you do? With gun control the criminal knows that you don’t have a gun and won’t hesitate to do or take whatever he pleases. In addition, the criminal will most likely have some type of weapon on him, but you won’t, and he’ll be able to kill you easily. Without gun control chances are, criminals won’t break into your house as much. Why? Because of the uncertainty of whether you have a gun or not. Everyone with a gun will have a way to defend themselves, should anything happen to them. Criminals will still have access to guns, they don’t listen to the law anyways. During an ATF investigation of 3,083 gun dealers, they found 12, 274 “missing” firearms. Why would any
…show more content…
No, they will get them with no paper trail so no one can prove it was them! Also the average response time for law enforcement is 10 to 12 minutes. The police will arrive after the crime is committed and the criminal is already gone. So it is probably in your best interest to own a gun! Gun control only Is for honest citizens, people who already follow the laws. If a person wants to commit a crime, they can find a way to illegally obtain a gun. Also, millions of people already have guns in the United States. How would we be able to recollect all the guns? Do some research seriously? Look up countries that teach their children at younger age’s proper use of guns. Look at countries and cities at younger ages proper use of guns Look at countries and cities who have a higher percent of people who own guns, the gun violence rate is actually lower. Guns don 't kill people, people kill people. Everyone has to understand this. Taking our American rights isn 't the solution. People are the issue here so don 't punish the good, honest gun owners because there are bad people in the world. We need a way to protect our self from our government. About everyone is armed, yet the crime and violence rate is extremely low! If we start controlling the guns for civilians, they won 't be able to protect themselves, and who say criminals will obey that law? Even if there is minimal control, it will make it so much harder for civilians to defend themselves! If your children are being attacked and you have nothing to help, no guns to defend them, you will have let them

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Murica doesn’t need Gun control Gun Control is a very hot topic these days. Some people think that having more gun laws in America would lessen the number of murders in America, however I think that having more strict gun control laws would do nothing to stop criminals from getting guns or killing people. Criminals will always find a way to get weapons. To prove this, handguns in the UK have been banned since 1998 and the murders have actually rose in numbers. For this reason I think gun control laws would not stop criminals from getting guns…

    • 420 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Guns, when used to their ability as lethal weapons, could result in two polar opposite outcomes, the death of an innocent person, or the death of a villain and savior of the innocent target (Pro Gun Control Arguments vs. Anti-Gun Control Arguments). Either way a person is dying, family and friends are losing someone near and dear to their hearts, and society loses another member. The laws about gun control at the moment are not working to the ability that they should be. People need to take action now, yet they need to take a reasonable action that will benefit the population the most while keeping the country safe. The laws on guns need to change to ensure the safety of people in the United States, yet the right to own a concealed handgun…

    • 214 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Gun control is a topic most American citizens do not like to debate about, but Ted Nugent a former singer and songwriter is not afraid of the topic. He is also a gun owner and supports gun owners’ rights. He claims if a country had a place where all responsible gun owner citizens lived there would be no crime, and if people mixed them with irresponsible gun owners who used guns for crime and harm that there would be a lot of crime. He explains in his own opinion, how it is a violation of our natural rights and against the second amendment, which states we have the right to bear arms as citizens. Gun control could be a necessity to keep people safe and there is going to be a look into this topic.…

    • 1887 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Second Amendment of the Bill of Rights states clearly that the people’s right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed on. This has led to one of the most complicated and volatile issues in America today. People on both sides of this issue have strong beliefs. Some argue that when our founding fathers wrote the bill of rights, the guns were not as deadly as the ones available today. Supporters of the Second Amendment today argue that people’s right should not be infringed on no matter what.…

    • 1041 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Fundamental rights are granted through the Constitution of the United States, and are a part of our liberty and freedom. Also, The Ninth Amendment reads, “The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people. In other words the right to bear arms should not be taken away from anyone. Opponents of gun control consider the right to bear arms in some sense a fundamental right, and having those rights taken away is unconstitutional. Although the Fourth Amendment protects the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, it doesn’t protect against felons possessing a firearm.…

    • 3270 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    SHOULD GUN CONTROL LAWS BE MORE STRICT? Should Gun Control Laws Be More Strict? Many individuals do not believe that carrying a gun will make them safer; On the contrary many of them carry both openly and concealed and society is better for it. One could ask why society would be better for it? There are many answers someone could provide, but one of the most logical ones would be "If they did somehow manage to take away legal weapons?…

    • 853 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As a result of a study of gun availability and crime rates, it is shown that areas with a high gun availability rate also have a high gun-related crime rates, through the seizure of twenty-nine guns by police during a six-month forceful regulation in Kansas City. This resulted in the reduction of its gun-related crimes by forty-nine percent (D’alessio, J, and Stolzenberg). Amending the gun control laws in the Unites States, federally, to include stricter background checks on gun purchasers and banning assault weapons lowers the number of guns that are on the street and may also lower the high rate of violent gun-related crime that our country is currently suffering…

    • 1104 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Society has been split into two over whether or not guns should be banned, but there needs to be a solution where both parties can be happy. Anti-gun advocates present reasoning why guns should be banned. McMahan’s main two arguments of why guns should be banned: one, guns in the community creates a more dangerous environment; and two, the police have less of a power to protect citizens when society has guns (Shafer-Landau, The Ethical Life (EL) 390). McMahan explains that communities are not going to be free of crimes with more people carrying around guns, because criminals will be more prepared, efficient, and quicker to grab and shoot their target (Shafer-Landau, EL 392-392). People with guns will be safer than people without guns, because they do not have a gun to protect themselves.…

    • 1631 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Guns are powerful. Not only in how much damage they can do to you with just one bullet fired, but even the presence of a gun can send any man, saint or criminal, running. Guns can be used as a form of offense and defence. They can protect our society, more than they damage it. Although some believe that gun control should further restrict the selling of firearms, they actually shouldn’t because they can be used as a form of defence, and citizens have the right, stated in the second amendment, to keep and bear arms.…

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why Is Gun Control Bad

    • 1702 Words
    • 7 Pages

    With all the recent events that push for gun control, it’s time to stop and think on who this is really helping, the good law abiding citizens, or the law breaking criminals. With the impact that guns do in our society, it is time to stop and think what gun control could do for our nation.(MORE DETAIL) Although gun control seems it might help our society, gun control is a bad idea, because it disarms law abiding citizens and arms the criminals. Gun Control takes away the gun of people who follow the law. Citizens who follow the law will be the only ones affected by gun control because the guns that citizens buy are on a record, their guns could be taken away with ease because there are gun records of what guns the law abiding citizens use.…

    • 1702 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun Control: Why Then Not Ban Everything that Poses a Potential Threat Gun Control is laws or policies that regulate the manufacture, sale, transfer, possession, modification, or use of firearms. Allowing Gun Control in our country will only minimize the rights our founding fathers granted us with. Although many believe that Gun Control is a solution to prevent crimes, studies on countries that already adopted Gun Control show no decrease in crimes. Gun Control will only detriment citizens by not allowing them to defend themselves or their property.…

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Gun Control Act of 1968 prohibited the sale of guns to several types of individuals consisting of minors, people with criminal records, disabled, illegal aliens, dishonorably discharged military personnel and others. In 1993 the Act was changed by the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act. This Act said that background checks for all unlicensed carriers had to be done before they could purchase any firearms from a licensed dealer. However, there has been discussion that there is a “gun show loophole” in the Firearms Owners Protection Act of 1986 which allows all people, including convicted felons, the ability to purchase guns without a background check. While many people have decidedly formed opinions on gun control, the debate is complicated…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Lately, it seems that every time you turn on the television, there is an incidence of gun violence in the news. School shootings, domestic violences, and other forms of firearm brutality make up most of the content displayed in the media, calling for a possible increase in gun control in the United States. This controversial subject has become a common topic of debate all over the country: should civilian-use of violent firearms be limited or prohibited, or should the decision to possess these guns be up to the individual person? There are many arguments supporting and opposing the government 's right to restrict the rights that the Constitution imposes. Some argue that taking weapons away from the people is a violation of the Second Amendment, while others argue that guns have changed too much over time for the allowances of the…

    • 1742 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why Guns Should Be Banned

    • 1761 Words
    • 8 Pages

    After obtaining guns, children and adults collect them and proceed to improve their accuracy in shooting, but getting rid of them would make the world a dangerous place. Many people who believe that guns are the leading cause of death in the United States, are incorrect. A gun is not a person, it has no feelings nor can it move on its own it cannot be personified nor be blamed for any of the actions. A gun must be wielded by a person and that person is the one responsible for pulling the trigger. If guns were banned and somehow a criminal couldn’t get his hand on one illegally, they can still kill.…

    • 1761 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Does Gun Control Reduce Crime? Gun control law has been one the most argued topic in the past decade in United States. Crime is widely viewed as a major issue for every society, government always tried to find solution in order to reduce the crime and violent rates. That is why gun control law and gun ownership has been argued intensively. However there has been a question, did gun control law reduce crime rate?…

    • 1214 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays