Body cameras change the way police officers interact with the public for the better. One quote from journalresource.org that emphasizes my point is ¨Officers who did not wear cameras performed 9.8% more stop-and-frisks and…
This is important because it did lower police brutality rates while filming the police because when the police officers are on camera, it seems like they would not do ridiculous things like shoot a civilian. In addition, filming an accident acts as evidence…
It took a long time for my group to decided on a topic due to some of the group members missing but we all agreed that “Pro Bodycam for URI police” is not only interesting and invigorating topic that considers almost all people of this community. We then divided up our work by giving each other a topic that we are interested in such as counterarguments to dangers/cons of body cameras, How cameras would benefit the officer and the benefits to the citizens are a few topics that the group will be exploring. The group has also starting to find suitable interviewees, so far, we believe that we should interview the chief of police at the University of Rhode Island and a criminology professor at the college. The team has a document where every member…
So conceptually there should be no disagreement as to whether officers should or should not wear these body cameras. Thee body cameras should be a routine part of policing that citizens will just expect and demand. So it after looking at the pros and cons of body cameras it has become very apparent that the pros outweigh the cons. These cameras have the potential to improve law enforcement…
With today’s technology, there is a rift between technology and personal privacy. Currently, no precise federal law prohibits surveillance cameras, but there is a fear with common-law confidentiality rights, which frequently leads to an evaluation of a person's "reasonable expectation of privacy. " Expectation of privacy is not an issue when overt cameras are used. A person’s expectation of privacy is also not void when on public campuses, such as Grand Valley. Surveillance cameras in public locations such as sidewalks or parking lots are no problem because there is not an expectation of privacy in such areas.…
A good video surveillance system will act as a criminal deterrent. It will alert you someone tries to intrude on your property. It protects you when you are home. It is a way to capture evidence in case someone commits a criminal act. Those are all solid reasons to get a video security system.…
There have already been a lot of reforms made to several police departments, but it wasn’t enough. I like the idea of police officers wearing body cameras but I feel like it is isn’t strict enough. I believe the officers should be required to submit their film everyday. If the police officers are seen doing anything that breaks the requirement then they should be suspended.…
Cameras have more storage, cost less, and last longer. ( Wing. ) In recent years we all know that police officers carry patrol car cameras. These cameras are not removable, and can not be rotated. Although they are in the front right side and the back left side, they often don't get everything going on.…
As with anything new the cameras still have things that need to be worked on but the good outweighs the bad. With being able to show solid evidence to hold someone accountable for their actions to being able to decrease complaints and use of force from officers are just a few of the positive aspects of the…
Throughout the past 10 years there has been many talks on whether the police should be required to wear body cameras. Throughout all the research and studies regarding these cameras, these have been many pros to body cams but there have also been cons and many challenges to implementing this system in police forces throughout the country. Many different police stations have done experiments with these cameras and have all shown very positive feedback. Regardless of the amount of work necessary to implement these cameras, it should be necessary for officers to wear these body cameras because they have the potential to save lives. To go along with that, police should be forced to wear these body cameras because they have the potential to save lives, give better representation than hearing a testimony, and make suspects less likely to run or attack an officer because everything they do is caught on camera.…
The body cameras would strengthen law enforcement itself by allowing a way to monitor officers activities and offer rewards and punishments based off their behavior. The general population would be affected by reduction of crime and overall aggressive behaviors in public. Knowing that there will be solid proof of any illegal activity if caught by a police officer, criminals may limit their activity to avoid jail time. Also, common citizens will be less likely to act recklessly, violently, or dangerously in public - possible cases including: sports games, bar fights, music festivals, and other public placing involving social interactions which may lead to disagreements. They are more likely to behave calmly in public if they are aware that an officer in the area could be recording their actions through a body camera.…
The police officers should then be presented with a new tape to go out on duty. Another concern people have with the cameras is that witnesses that can testify to a crime may not want to because they fear if they testify against the person, retaliation will occur. This will make a lot of unsolved…
This will require an officer to impose a punishment that will fit the violation committed. Therefore, an officer should have a rulebook on what punishment will be given based on the offender violation. However, for serious…
The numbers recorded from this had a great turn out. This experiment showed that when police officers wear body cameras while on duty, the amount of crime as well as complaints on officers is significantly lower than with cops who do not wearing body cameras. To be exact, the use of force by officers wearing cameras dropped 59 percent while complaints on cops dropped a staggering 87 percent from the previous year.(P Foundation) This stuck out to the public so much that even the President began to encourage police to wear body cameras. President Obama then went to Congress to ask for funding for fifty thousand body worn cameras nationwide.…
The use of the cameras causes the corrupt police to act better, and it also causes citizens to behave so that there is a smaller chance of a bad encounter with officers. There is no way to argue the fact that wearing body cameras significantly reduces misconduct, and there are many studies that show it. Another study done by the University of Cambridge showed that “when police wear body… use of force dropped by more than 50%.” There is no way to argue facts, body cameras are a must, they put more pressure on the police to behave justly, in turn the rate of misconduct significantly…