What Are The Pros And Cons Of Superpacs

Improved Essays
Rough Draft- Super-PACs: How the Riches’ Votes Matter More than Everyone Else’s America prides itself in having equality of opinion, however some opinions are valued more than others. This irony is due to the presence of super-PACs in recent American elections. These super-PACs are organizations that allow the wealthy to have a louder voice over the many by flooding the airwaves with propaganda and by donating to politicians to buy favors from them. The presence of Super-PACs in the 2016 elections have resulted in candidates ignoring their constituents and increasing partisanship due to money from super-PACs that go to negative advertising and persuading politicians to favor those who donate to their campaign rather than their constituents. The …show more content…
This is a weak argument as proponents of this belief still have to concede that super-PACs do increase partisanship due to their negative advertisements and give candidates with super-PACs an advantage over candidates who do not. This is especially true in state elections where candidates do not have the exposure that the national stage gives. In state races, super-PACs are everything. Super-PACs are able to give those who are not incumbents the publicity and outreach they need to wage a successful campaign. To say super-PACs do not affect presidential elections is also incorrect as all Republican candidates have super-PACs so it comes down to whose message resonates more with the American people. On the Democratic side Hillary Clinton has a super-PAC and Bernie Sanders does not. Had Bernie Sanders not had the amount of small donors his message would be washed away by the tide of large money advertisements from the pro-Clinton super-PACs. Super-PACs still result in candidates ignoring their constituencies and increased

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In today’s modern democracy, political parties and interest groups play a huge projecting role in the United States government and it is rising quickly. Political parties and interest groups are organized groups of people who work towards specific goals within the government, promoting politicians and raising money to help accomplish certain needs. While yes, both groups are working towards similar goals they often times serve different purposes within the country’s political system. The real question is whether or not either of these groups are helping improve America or if they are helping to diminish the American political system.…

    • 1078 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    We the people, the poor and the middle class have no major say or influence when it comes to campaigns and public officials. We only matter to them during election days to persuade us to for them. They claim to be for the good of the citizens, and that they will protect us from lobbyist and…

    • 540 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    All citizens of the United States have, at one point or another, been taught that America is a nation founded on the principles of a democratic society. Principles that, forged in the crucible of war, endow it citizens with an undeniable right to directly participate in the political process. America’s Forefathers would be profoundly disappointed, however, to learn that the unchecked influence of special interest has sullied the very fabric of United States politics. The Founding Fathers, in spite of their boundless knowledge, had not the foresight to see just how easily monetary influence would try the fortitude of their burgeoning political system. The effects of their unknowingness permeate throughout the United States government; yet still the American people are seemingly unware of – or perhaps altogether unmoved by – the astonishing amount of money being funneled into the political machine, let alone the identities of those making such remarkable donations. A series of wide-sweeping Congressional legislation which champions transparency in all matters of campaign finance is needed if the American electorate is to lift the veil on soft money…

    • 852 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, which occurred in 2010, is a standout amongst the most misconstrued U.S. Preeminent Court choices of cutting edge times. A standard, sensible decision, Citizens United by one means or another turned into a lightning bar for revolutionaries, would-be blue pencils and fanatic hacks over the political range. Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission is a point of interest 5-to-4 choices by the United States Supreme Court that corporate financing of independent political programs in hopeful races can't be restricted, on the grounds that doing as such would be in resistance with the First Amendment. The choice came about because of the non-benefit company Citizens United's case under the watchful…

    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    (3). Do you believe that Political Action Committees - including those that are directly associated with Interest Groups - have a corrupting influence on our democracy? Or, are they simply a necessary and important part of our democratic system of government and politics - one component of a pluralistic political system?…

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Super Prc Pros And Cons

    • 1622 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In 2010 the United Citizen v. Federal Election Commission would have a bigger impact on the way elections are won. The case decision concluded limiting the amount PACs and donors spend on campaigns for candidates violates the First Amendment. Since the court case decision, Super PACs were created to donate unlimited amounts of money to a campaign for a candidate. Super PACs were mostly used by Republicans. The Democratic party are opposed by Super PACs. However, even though the Democratic party are objective to the idea of Super PACs they have Super PACs themselves. The reasons why the Democratic party and some citizen politically involved are criticizing Super PACs because of how powerful they influence elections to sway their direction.…

    • 1622 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the case of Citizens United, the Supreme Court had established that individual people and groups such as special interest groups, for example, could form committees in which they could gain an unlimited amount of money in order for them to run against a particular candidate, or political party. This is…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    From watching the frontline documentary and reading the book, I think that interest groups have too much influence in American politics. Interest groups are seen to be everywhere in the nation and I believe that by them creating a great deal of controversy helps to create a division between the government and its people. Interest groups first objective is not political influence but simple survival, which helps to shape a group’s political activity. The issue that I see constantly arising is that the American government is more responsive to special interest rather than public interest. This often results in the public being disappointed with the way the political system is set up and making individuals feel as though they’re at a loss. Democracy is about citizens having an equal say in the governing process, but many interest groups have an unfair influence over what the government can do.…

    • 1309 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Five years ago Citizens United spearheaded a campaign to steal the people's power and unfortunately the Supreme Court decided to rule in favor of the controversial right-wing group, in the devastating ruling of Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission. This disastrous move by the "Supreme Court scrapped the previous campaign finance laws and essentially declared that companies are allowed to buy politicians by circumventing restrictions via PACs, political action committees" (Tedford), thus stealing the power of the masses and giving our power to those whose bank accounts resemble that of a country's population. Sadly, the affluent 1% of Americans hold more power than the other 99% of this nation because of the current government's pay to win democracy. Without any…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Running for office is difficult task. Candidates have to deal with tasks such as finding money to run their campaign, convincing the public they will be able to make a difference, and incorporating the public’s views into their campaigns. Throughout their campaign, candidates are influenced by extra-constitutional actors, such as the media, public opinion, interest groups, and political parties. In the election of governor in Massachusetts this year, it can be seen that all of these extra-constitutional actors have influenced the candidates. All of the extra-constitutional actors exist to inform, motivate, and educate voters, but each one has its own individual goal. Without these, the people would have no say in what happens in political races. They help keep people involved and engaged.…

    • 1963 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The wealthy and well-to-do taking up 83 percent of Congress in H.H., NY, NJ, and taking up 88 percent of congress in MD, VA, and S.C, shows a lack of voice through political representation of only the wealthy. Lack of voice can create a world where no one's problems are heard and not a single person knows what's happening around them. Voice is being able to speak one’s opinion without fear of persecution, having the ability to participate in government, and to inform others of news concerning oneself, the country and society.…

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    What Are Superdelegates?

    • 109 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Superdelegates are elite members of the Democratic party and make up 15% of all delegates. While Delegates are selected by citizen votes during state caucuses or primaries, superdelegates are given their superdelegate status by falling into one of three categories: a major elected official, including senators, members of the House, and governors; a notable member of the party, such as a current or former president or vice president; and members of the Democratic National Committee. Unlike the pledged delegates who are pledged to certain candidates, superdelegates are free to support whichever candidate they chose, even if they’re not voters pick.…

    • 109 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    First Amendment Cons

    • 723 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Although the Constitution as ratified in 1788 excluded several key demographics, developments throughout history have steadily rendered our democracy more inclusive, creating the promise of a government in which all people have a voice in its path forward. However, one recent Supreme Court decision has acted as a deadly corrosive agent for the promise of democracy in America; the majority in the Supreme Court case Citizens United v. FEC has extended First Amendment speech rights to include unlimited donations made by corporations. The decision has opened floodgates allowing the wealthiest Americans to exercise increased control over the political process, thus drowning out the voices of the majority. In order to recover from this striking blow…

    • 723 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In January 2010, the United States Supreme Court Citizens United ruling struck down the ban on limiting corporate and union contributions and financing of elections. This ruling unleashed a wave of unlimited spending on political ads and other strategic to support candidates and/or damage the image of opposition candidates. The court decision was divided in a 5-4 vote. Essentially, this decision made it permissible for corporations and unions to spend unlimited sums of money on efforts to sway people’s decisions on voting for or against a specific candidate or number of candidates. Although the Citizens United ruling still prohibits unions and corporations to contribute directly to federal political candidates, these groups can easily by-pass…

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In light of the numerous differences between Democrats and Republicans, the two parties are similar in their fight for campaign dollars. This has reached to the extent that they both vote their donors’ wishes, rather than of the American people who voted them in. Donors include people that fund the political candidates. For example, charitable organizations and Political Action Committees. Furthermore, both parties work to expand surveillance…

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays