Defense Of Marriage Act

Superior Essays
Defense of Marriage Act
Sabina Exy
Palm Beach State College

Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to inform the reader of the Defense of Marriage Act set in 1996. It explains why Congress felt the need to pass this act into law. this act was passed and the problems that came along with it. You are writing this paper to analyze the Defense of Marriage Act, to determine the public need, to analyze the solution, to determine what challenges your Act faced and to analyze the effectiveness of the policy. Keywords: Defense of marriage act, DOMA, same sex marriage,

DEFENSE OF MARRIAGE ACT
Public Need
There has always been a problem with separating church from state. And even though Congressmen should separate
…show more content…
The purpose of this act was to define and protect the institution of marriage. It was brought to Congress by House of Representative member Bob Barr. It was passed by both the Senate and the House of Representatives. This act has three sections. The first section is to tell us that the act may be referred to as the Defense of Marriage Act. The second section is to tell us that none of the states are required to recognize and treat same-sex marriages the same to heterosexual marriages. The reason why the second section needed to be established is because of the Full Faith and Credit Clause, all states and territories of America must honor other state’s laws and decision. Lastly, the third section defines what marriage is federally, which is a legal union between a man and a woman (Defense of Marriage Act). Meaning, for homosexual couples, even if legally married, benefits of heterosexual couples such as social security, filing of joint taxes, and insurance would not be accessible to …show more content…
During the time he signed the bill he needed to think about being reelected, so he signed the bill more out of politics than his own actual principles (Baker, 2013). The problems with this act is that section two of DOMA clashes with the Full Faith and Credit Clause, it does not allow same sex marriages the same benefits of heterosexual marriages, it sets a standard of one marriage being more important over another, and it really denies rights of a particular group of people who live in the same country, working the same jobs, and paying the same taxes as everyone else. In Section three of DOMA, marriage is defined as a being between a man and a woman (DOMA), so the gay couples that are legally married are not able to receive the same benefits as legal married couples. Very recently, in 2013, in the case of United States v Windsor, the Supreme Court found section three of DOMA to be considered unconstitutional (United States v Windsor, 2013).

References
Baker, P. (2013, March 25). Now in Defense of Gay Marriage, Bill Clinton. The New York Times.
Clinton, B. (2013, March 7). Bill Clinton: It’s time to overturn DOMA. The Washington Post.
Herman, D. (1994). Rights of Passage: Struggles for Lesbian and Gay Legal Equality. Toronto: University of Toronto Press Incorporated.
SCHWARTZ, J. (2010, November 8). Gay Couples to Sue

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In the court case United States v. Windsor, problems provoked regarding the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA). The DOMA was a United States federal law that prohibited homosexual marriage while defining a marriage as a relationship between a male and a female. This act was soon ruled unconstitutional under the Due Process Clause of the 5th amendment. Edith Windsor and Thea Spyer were happily married in Ontario, Canada (2007) until Thea Spyer died in 2009, leaving behind all their property for Edith. Similarly to what usually happens after a spouse dies, Windsor believed that she would be able to claim the federal estate tax exemption for surviving spouses; however, since Windsor and Spyer had a homosexual marriage, Windsor was not considered Spyer’s…

    • 651 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 2009, Thea Clara Spyer passed away leaving behind her estate to her domestic partner, Edith Windsor. The couple wed in 2007 in Canada and as residents of New York, their marriage was recognized by the state. However, the IRS denied Windsor a spousal deduction under federal law citing the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA.) DOMA’s section 3 refers to marriage only as the legal union between one man and one woman. Windsor chose to challenge DOMA, believing same-sex couples are entitled to equal protection and due process.…

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Obergefell vs Hodges June 26, 2015. The United States Supreme Court finalized the case known as Obergefell vs Hodges. The case involved a decades long battle between states and people on weather or not gay marriage should be legalized. Same-sex couples, and other advocates of same-sex marriage sued their state marriage agencies in Ohio, Michigan, Kentucky, and Tennessee on weather or not their right to refuse same-sex marriage was violating the 14th Amendment, which addresses many parts of the right of US Citizens. [ Obergefell v. Hodges.…

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Earlier this year, the Supreme Court in the case Obergefell v. Hodges, the court heard a case in which the plaintiffs argued that a ban on same sex marriage violated certain provisions of the 14th Amendment. The plaintiffs specifically argued that the ban violated the concept of protection of liberty. The court ruled in a 5-4 decision that same-sex marriage is legal across all 50 states because they view marriage as a union of two people and not solely as a union of a man and a woman. Although it was a 5-4 decision in the Supreme Court, the majority opinion stated that the 14th Amendment was being violated. The dissenting opinion on the other hand, focussed on several ideas.…

    • 1275 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The right to marry might seem trivial to some, but for those who have never been able too, it is an amazing feeling. Although not everyone feels so positively about it, those individuals are not in great company at least that is what the research suggests. That is not to say that these individuals and entities are not causing problems for those trying to enjoy the right. The most notable are the clerks in Kentucky refusing to issue licenses and the courts in Arkansas upholding poor legislation to attack homosexual couples. Overall, this case decision has set the stage for equal protection and treatment for the LGBT…

    • 1048 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Under America’s first governing document, the Articles of Confederation, the national government grew weak and states operated like independent countries. In response to this the delegates at the 1787 convention which was originally set to ratify the Articles of Confederation devised a plan for a stronger federal government with three branches–executive, legislative and judicial–along with a system of checks and balances to ensure that no one branch would ever gain too much power. The U.S. Constitution established America’s national government and fundamental laws, while guaranteeing that certain basic rights for its citizens would be established and protected. It was signed on September 17, 1787, by delegates to the Constitutional Convention…

    • 1481 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marriage is a civil union that should be a right that all are allowed to. Not just for the individuals, but to promote healthy and happy family relationships. The case does more than allow individuals to marry, it redefines marriage as it has always been know. Some would call marriage an intimate union between a man and a woman to provide a stable family, the government can easily redefine this. The Constitution does not define marriage, the people define marriage.…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Lawrence Vs Texas Essay

    • 694 Words
    • 3 Pages

    What is the Lawrence versus Texas case, and what effect has it had on the society? This is a set of questions that numerous people have asked over the years. Are you one of them? Today I will explain what the Lawrence versus Texas case was, my perceptions on the case, what it did for society as a whole, the historical basis for the court’s ruling in this case, and last but not least I will explain the civil liberties groups that were involved and their impact on the case. Let’s start with the case itself.…

    • 694 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Obergefell v. Hodges case lasted around 6 years. The petitioner was James Obergefell, et al. and Richard Hodges, Director of the Ohio Department of Health, et al. This case took place in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, Western Division. The deciding court was Roberts Court in the years of 2010 and 2016.…

    • 1035 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    There have been several times within American politics where the rights of groups of people have been fought over. These types of fights have been spread over the course of America’s history the most well known being the Civil Rights movement in the 1960s. One of the most recent of these fights was the repeal of California’s Proposition 8, originally titled the “California Marriage Protection Act,” which only affected same-sex couples. Proposition 8 was a proposal for an amendment addition to the California constitution stating “only marriage between a man and a women is valid or recognized in California,” creating controversy between groups. The California Supreme Court saw that “limiting marriage to opposite-sex couples,” was violating…

    • 1742 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In February of 2011 President Barrack Obama made a landmark declaration that he would no longer defend the Defense of Marriage Act. (Freedom to Marry 4) Under the logic that it was made unconstitutional by the equal protection clause. In the following February a group was created called the Human Rights Campaign the group had but a single goal; to get the Defense of Marriage Act repealed. By the end of the month the U.S. District Court ruled that a section of the Defense of Marriage Act was unconstitutional. In May of 2012 The U.S. Court of Appeals also found the Defense of Marriage Act to be Unconstitutional.…

    • 1190 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On June 26, 2015, LBGT+ activist groups rejoiced as the United States Supreme Court ruled in favor of legalizing same-sex marriage believing that a ban of it violated the 14th amendment of the Constitution. This didn’t help stop any hatred of same-sex couples and it seemed that the world would implode due to the court’s decision However, backlash soon followed, leading to an Appeals court, saying it didn’t violate the 14th amendment and many “Christian” groups saying the ruling by the Supreme Court goes against the bible. In the case of Obergefell vs. Hodges, the ruling has influenced the United States to take steps in a more progressive future where everyone has equal rights and helping America begin its transition into a more positive light with supporting this decision. Much of the backlash from this decision was due to these different “Christian” activist groups who said that same-sex marriage went against their religious liberties and violated the bible in Leviticus. Which is quite hilarious as none of them probably adhere to the teaching in the book of Leviticus like no eating shellfish and no mixing different materials to wear like a cotton, polyester blend…

    • 1088 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Reasoning: • State argued it is merely leveling the field for all sexualities, not discriminating. • Court argued that this law cut off any way for a homosexual or bisexual to seek any political or judicial route for actions of…

    • 1954 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    But, on the other hand, telling a couple they can’t marry because of it, and making it illegal for gays to marry, is striping homosexuals of their natural rights. We as the United States can’t be known as the country who treats everyone equal, because we don’t. Especially against homosexual males and females. To sum it all up, denying them their natural rights is wrong, and society shouldn’t be dictating who can marry who. They will marry whoever they want, it’s not hurting anyone in particular, so why is it illegal?…

    • 1071 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Argumentative Essay On Same Sex Marriage

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 7 Works Cited

    Same-sex marriage is not only disruptive to the societal order, it also disrupts the Constitution. The Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) was an amendment to the Constitution…

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 7 Works Cited
    Superior Essays