For generations The United States has been the leader of not only the free world but for the medical world as well as it has the top of the line research facilities. Not only does being number one in a field brings bragging rights to a country and shows superiority but also helps build an economy. By cutting funds of these potentially life-saving programs it destroys scientist careers and forces the citizens and the nation as a whole to rely on other countries’ work, giving the opposing country the edge of the less advanced country. As stated in the Congressional Digest, “Federal research money is needed to keep the United States at the forefront of this new medical frontier and to compete with scientists in Britain and other countries working under much less restrictive systems.” As it already stands, the United States has been put to a disadvantage compared to other countries as we have different moral standards which require stricter regulations. To add to this program, right when the stem cell research really started to pick up, in 1995 stem cell research on human embryos was banned and the use of adult stem cells wasn’t truly utilized until around 2006. Possibly seeing the error of his legislation, at the end of the term President Clinton “ruled that scientists could conduct federally funded research on embryonic stem cell lines as long as the scientists did not participate in the destruction of the embryos.” (Congressional Digest). However, these rules were never put into place. It wouldn’t be until August 2001 when President Bush announced the four conditions that must be met in order to receive government funding. The conditions were that “. . . research be performed only on existing cell lines, that cells be taken from excess embryos created solely for reproductive purposes; that the
For generations The United States has been the leader of not only the free world but for the medical world as well as it has the top of the line research facilities. Not only does being number one in a field brings bragging rights to a country and shows superiority but also helps build an economy. By cutting funds of these potentially life-saving programs it destroys scientist careers and forces the citizens and the nation as a whole to rely on other countries’ work, giving the opposing country the edge of the less advanced country. As stated in the Congressional Digest, “Federal research money is needed to keep the United States at the forefront of this new medical frontier and to compete with scientists in Britain and other countries working under much less restrictive systems.” As it already stands, the United States has been put to a disadvantage compared to other countries as we have different moral standards which require stricter regulations. To add to this program, right when the stem cell research really started to pick up, in 1995 stem cell research on human embryos was banned and the use of adult stem cells wasn’t truly utilized until around 2006. Possibly seeing the error of his legislation, at the end of the term President Clinton “ruled that scientists could conduct federally funded research on embryonic stem cell lines as long as the scientists did not participate in the destruction of the embryos.” (Congressional Digest). However, these rules were never put into place. It wouldn’t be until August 2001 when President Bush announced the four conditions that must be met in order to receive government funding. The conditions were that “. . . research be performed only on existing cell lines, that cells be taken from excess embryos created solely for reproductive purposes; that the