Stem Cell Debate

Improved Essays
Every day in the field of science is a new day filled with new discoveries. Along with these discoveries we are slowly being able to better understand the world around us and make cures for the incurable along the way. Within the past couple of decades, science has advanced so fast that it’s sometimes hard to keep up with all the changes and to be able to accept them as reality. However, when there are new scientific discoveries there are often debates on its reliability and whether or not it’s ethical to use such means, but usually is accepted within a decade or two. The use of stem cells, however, has been a topic of debate since the 1970s and shows no sign of ending just yet. Even so, research in this field has continued and has shown that …show more content…
For generations The United States has been the leader of not only the free world but for the medical world as well as it has the top of the line research facilities. Not only does being number one in a field brings bragging rights to a country and shows superiority but also helps build an economy. By cutting funds of these potentially life-saving programs it destroys scientist careers and forces the citizens and the nation as a whole to rely on other countries’ work, giving the opposing country the edge of the less advanced country. As stated in the Congressional Digest, “Federal research money is needed to keep the United States at the forefront of this new medical frontier and to compete with scientists in Britain and other countries working under much less restrictive systems.” As it already stands, the United States has been put to a disadvantage compared to other countries as we have different moral standards which require stricter regulations. To add to this program, right when the stem cell research really started to pick up, in 1995 stem cell research on human embryos was banned and the use of adult stem cells wasn’t truly utilized until around 2006. Possibly seeing the error of his legislation, at the end of the term President Clinton “ruled that scientists could conduct federally funded research on embryonic stem cell lines as long as the scientists did not participate in the destruction of the embryos.” (Congressional Digest). However, these rules were never put into place. It wouldn’t be until August 2001 when President Bush announced the four conditions that must be met in order to receive government funding. The conditions were that “. . . research be performed only on existing cell lines, that cells be taken from excess embryos created solely for reproductive purposes; that the

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Embryonic stem cells, which are different from the iPSCs described here, have faced roadblocks in the form of government defunding their research and the general population raising concerns about the morality of using embryos for research. They also faced challenges when scientists became too optimistic, and hoped the stem cells would prove effectively therapeutic, rather than just a means to perform drug tests. So far these attempts have failed in…

    • 1720 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hyun, Insoo. "III. Embryonic Stem Cell Research." Bioethics. Ed.…

    • 922 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The process of most stem cell research is executed is with the use of an embryo. According to the Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Association (ALS), “embryonic stem cells can be isolated from fertilized embryos less than a week old.” This process has caused some controversy throughout world and many have chosen not to support stem cell research because of this fact. Many people are disturbed by this because the researchers create a human life from an egg and sperm cell to create an embryo and then use the embryo for the stem cells only, then rid of the embryo all together. One would believe that this is murder because of the destruction and death of an early but yet still live embryo.…

    • 1294 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the end publicly funding means no abuse and organized and regulated research and experiments. Secondly, the reason we should publicly fund it because we could maybe be able to cure diseases that we couldn’t now. In a Vanderbilt article “Funding the Future: Embryonic Stem Cell Research”…

    • 416 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    We will also vigorously support scientists who pursue this research. And we will aim for America to lead the world in the discoveries it one day may yield… ... Scientists believe these tiny cells may have the potential to help us understand and possibly cure, some of our most devastating diseases and conditions; to regenerate a severed spinal cord and lift someone from a wheelchair; to spur insulin production and spare a child from a lifetime of needles; to treat Parkinson’s, cancer, heart disease, and others that affect millions of Americans and the people who love them… ... But medical miracles do not happen simply by accident. They result from painstaking and costly research, from years of lonely trial and error, much of which never bears fruit and from a Government willing to support that work… ...…

    • 1169 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Embryonic Stem Cell research (ESCR) evokes immediate controversy because of its intimate connection with human biomaterials. Ethical concerns for this type of research involve human dignity, personal privacy, and autonomy (Knapp). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy argues that there is a dilemma between the duties to alleviate human suffering and the preservation of potential life. While it is true that research on embryos involved in research become destroyed, the potential therapeutic use is promising. How we view, human embryos is key in making any distinction to this argument.…

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    One of the most debated topics in science is the use embryonic stem cells in scientific research. The ethical debate surrounding embryonic stem cell research comes down to two core values that we want to uphold: the alleviation of human suffering and preserving the inherent value of human life. Embryonic stem cell research is such a tricky topic because it requires us to choose between these two core values. We cannot uphold both values because the alleviation of suffering in this case is accomplished by the destruction of a human embryo, which would normally have the potential to develop into a new individual. Thus, we must fully examine both sides of the argument in order to understand the ethical implications of this issue.…

    • 1754 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Such research creates some concerns for the public. The article Pro-Life News in Brief describes the process of this type of research, stating that “embryonic cells are harvested by killing developing human beings” (“Pro-Life News in Brief” 1), and this implies how embryonic stem cell research causes harm to embryos. This article then compares the process of embryonic stem cell research to that of adult stem cell research. It was stated that “adult cells are extracted without harming the donor.” (“Pro-Life News in Brief” 1).…

    • 1512 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many people are opposed to embryonic stem cell research as it is necessary to terminate a living human embryo, which individuals like Pro life advocates think of as murder. There are two different types of stem cells we can encounter, embryonic stem cells and somatic stem cells also known as body cells. These cells are very important for living organisms as the embryo forms the structure for the foundation of the organism like muscle cells. Stem cells render a possibility for the treatment of diseases like heart diseases or macular degeneration. “Using adult stem cells drawn from bone marrow and umbilical cord blood stem cells, scientists have discovered new treatments for scores of diseases and conditions such as Parkinson's disease, juvenile diabetes, and spinal cord injuries.”…

    • 984 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In August of 2001 President George Bush announced that federal money could go to researched working on already developed embryonic stem cell (ESC) lines. Among the scientists these lines were referred to as “presidential lines” because there are only 21 viable lines. With such a small number of lines it limits genetic diversity of the stem cells. This is a big problem because without genetic diversity how are the doctors and scientist suppose to help a specific person and their illness? Another problem with the presidential lines is, they are very old and they do not age up to expectations.…

    • 1240 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The use of human embryonic stem cells has been hailed as the next major step in the battle against serious degenerative disorders such as diabetes and heart disease, and for some, debilitating for lethal neurological diseases, such as Parkinson’s. (Braude, Minger & Warwick). However this is a hotly debated issue. Ethical Dilemma The main controversy surrounding stem cell research isn’t about “if” it should be done or not, but rather what source of stem cells are okay to use and what methods are okay for obtaining them.…

    • 1830 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The United States of America is the leading country in medical research followed closely by The United Kingdom and Germany. Embryonic stem cell research is a huge opportunity for further advancement. Although some oppose embryonic stem cell research on the grounds of their personal morals, the government has a responsibility to promote research on embryonic stem cells. Embryonic stem cells have the potential to treat incurable diseases; stopping this research would hinder medical treatment and ultimately hurt those affected by diseases that could be treated.…

    • 1487 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Embryonic Stem Cells Essay

    • 1617 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Should the Federal Government Fund the Research of Embryonic Stem Cells Every day, people are diagnosed with life-threatening diseases like Alzheimer 's, Parkinson 's, and cancer, their cells are literally fighting against themselves. One way this can be corrected is with the use of stem cells. Stem cells are an undifferentiated cell of a multicellular organism that is capable of developing into an indefinite amount of cells of the same type. There are two prominent types of stem cells, embryonic and adult stem cells. Adult stem cells are found in adults, children, babies, placentas, cadavers, and umbilical cords and can be extracted without any harm to the individual.…

    • 1617 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Stem cell research has been going on controversy for generations. In the 1800’s, it was discovered that cells were able to replicate themselves. Attempts for years were made to use cells to create human life outside of the body, which led to the realization that they can also replicate red blood cells. In 1968, the first bone marrow transplant was completed to treat twins with severe immunodeficiency. In 1998, a man named Thompson created cells from the inner cell mass of embryos and developed the first embryonic stem cell lines.…

    • 625 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Embryonic stem cell research is an ongoing controversial topic that is still a major issue today. It is a subject that starts a debate every moment it is brought up. This topic will continue throughout time to be a controversial subject. There is one thing that will not change in this topic and it is the facts that go along with it. Each side has an argument that has information to back it up but there are important factors that will remain the same.…

    • 1795 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays