First is making inappropriate generalizations from a statistic, or jumping to conclusions. For example, we may meet a lazy person who happens to be on government assistance, and just assume that all people on that same assistance are the same. This type of thinking and generalization leads to other faulty conclusions about other instances. Second is a taking a number that means one thing and interpreting it to mean something completely different. For example, the percentage of violent crimes in a given area may seem high but when you take those numbers and compare them to another area based on percentage of population these numbers may not seem so high but in reality they are the same. The media or government will use this tactic to make one place seem worse than others. Third concerns confusion. Confusion transformations involve misunderstanding the meaning of more complex
First is making inappropriate generalizations from a statistic, or jumping to conclusions. For example, we may meet a lazy person who happens to be on government assistance, and just assume that all people on that same assistance are the same. This type of thinking and generalization leads to other faulty conclusions about other instances. Second is a taking a number that means one thing and interpreting it to mean something completely different. For example, the percentage of violent crimes in a given area may seem high but when you take those numbers and compare them to another area based on percentage of population these numbers may not seem so high but in reality they are the same. The media or government will use this tactic to make one place seem worse than others. Third concerns confusion. Confusion transformations involve misunderstanding the meaning of more complex