The Violation Of The Civil Rights Act Of 1875

Improved Essays
Register to read the introduction… Among the grievances were exclusion from a hotel dining room; refusal of admission to a New York City opera; segregation to lower-quality seats in a theater; and removal from a train car set aside for white women. All of these indignities were violations of rights enumerated in the 1875 legislation. The Supreme Court analyzed these cases in view of the Fourteenth Amendment and concluded the Amendment was not designed to apply to private citizens or private organizations, but only to the federal and state governments. This decision resulted in the Civil Rights Act of 1875 being invalidated, and opened the doors to blatant discrimination by businesses and individuals. John Marshall Harlan, who was a supporter of civil rights, was the lone voice of dissent on the Court, which ruled 8-1 against the petitioners. Harlan argued that the Thirteenth Amendment was intended to remove the badge of servitude, and that Congress had the right to legislate against the …show more content…
In New Orleans, attorney, newspaper publisher (The Crusader), and later physician, Louis André Martinet helped organize the "Citizens' Committee to Test the Constitutionality of the Separate Car Law" (generally called the "Citizens' Committee") in 1891. Their first orchestrated challenge was carried out by Daniel Desdunes, who purchased a first-class ticket from the Louisiana & Nashville Railroad to travel from New Orleans, LA, to Montgomery, AL, across state lines. The initial protest was against practices that violated established federal statutes, in this case invoking the Commerce Clause of the Constitution, which granted Congress the right to regulate travel and business between the states. Congress earlier declared segregation could not be applied to interstate travelers because it disrupted the flow of commerce, a rule not based on individual rights, but on federal supremacy. On February 24, 1892, Desdunes boarded a segregated "whites-only" coach and refused to leave. He was duly arrested. Desdunes case never went to trial, however, because the Louisiana Supreme Court voted in another case on May 25, 1892, Abbott v. Hicks, 44 La.Ann. 770, to uphold federal Commerce Clause regulations, rendering the Desdunes case moot. The Citizens' Committee raised $3,000 to finance a second dispute. Martinet had established ongoing correspondence with New York attorney Albion Tourgee, a well-known, "white" former judge (Tourgee's comments about himself actually suggest he considered himself an a person of mixed heritage who was "passing" as white) and author of French descent. Tourgee helped create the North Carolina Constitution, and had served as a superior court judge for several years. He was known for his intensity and intelligence, and was also a militant supporter of equality. The Citizen's Committee

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    He argued that the fourteenth amendment was being ignored as Plessy’s rights to “equal protection” were being neglected. While reflecting the majority decision of this case, Justice Henry Billings Brown stated that the ‘separate but equal doctrine” depended on the status of equality of all races, the usage of different facilities were a matter for society itself, not the courts. Also that the “…Laws… requiring their separation.. do not necessarily imply the inferiority of either race.” The United Stated Supreme Court ended up ruling the Louisiana Separate Car Law perfectly constitutional. After losing the case, Homer Plessy was charged $25 for the violation of the law of Louisiana.…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Ferguson, is one of the most important Supreme Court decision made dealing with civil rights issues. The Court ruled on the concept of 'separate but equal ' and set back the civil rights movement and race relations in the United States. In Plessy v. Ferguson, the Supreme Court considered the constitutionality of a Louisiana law passed in 1890 "providing for separate railway carriages for the white and colored races (). " The law, required that all passenger railways provide separate cars for black and white passengers, with one stipulation that the cars be equal in service, the law even went further in banning whites from sitting in black railroad cars and blacks in white railroad cars. The law penalized any passenger or railway employees for violating its terms of the segregated rail road cars.…

    • 1940 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    For these reasons plessy argued is freedom since he was in fact seven-eighths white and one-eighth black, and had the appearance of a white man. In Dreds case, northern antislavery justices John McLean of Ohio and Benjamin R. Curtis of Massachusetts agreed with scott, arguing that he should be freed under the Missouri Compromise since he had traveled north of the 36°30′ line. Where freedom had been issued to all races. Showing, that he had no freedom since he came from a slave state and this was constitutional.…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The thirteenth amendment to the United States Constitution changed our nation in a radical way. During the previous years, a path was carved to make way for a movement that would abolish slavery and change the United States’ culture. This amendment is a crucial and intriguing part of the Constitution, in fact- its original purpose was not to abolish slavery. The thirteenth amendment that was first passed in February of 1861 was to ensure that slavery would remain legal in the states.…

    • 1490 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In January 1865, the Thirteenth Amendment was approved a constitutional amendment to abolish slavery throughout the nation. When ratified later that year, the thirteenth amendment banned both slavery and forced labor. It gave Congress the power to make laws to enforce its terms. Outlawing slavery Quote: “Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime, whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subjected to their jurisdiction.”…

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although the North was progressing with the integration of black people, the South was holding out strong going against integration. The South did a lot of things to hold segregation to their tradition. They were scared to change. This essay will show how the South lived before the Emmett Till case and the Civil Rights’ Movement, also what the South did to resist integration, and lastly how the town of Money,Mississippi, worked together so two killers did not get convicted for a murder of a black forteen-year old boy.…

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He recalled the Separate Car Act as an example that was correlated with the current case. He argued that the law is meant to interfere with the personal liberty and freedom of both races, however he attributed the liberties of African Americans being violated, as it had happened in the past. It was essential that the Constitution should take no account of a man's "surroundings or color" when his civil rights should be guaranteed…

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Black Codes were laws that were brought about in the South around 1865 to limit the freedom of black people (Alchin). These limitations include permission to travel, segregation, and limited choice in employment. The purpose of Black Codes was to reacquire control over recently freed slaves, inhibit their freedom, and avoid black uprisings (Alchin). According to the Fourteenth Amendment, the recently freed slaves were citizens of the United States, so by introducing the Black Codes, they were contradicting the rights granted to African Americans. That is, until the Reconstruction Act of 1867 came about.…

    • 374 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dbq Jim Crow Era

    • 895 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The claim of these laws were the promotion of equality but it was made clear that segregation of African Americans from Caucasians were the basis. These so called equal accommodations were in fact the opposite of equal. Equality was simply not the case and African American passengers sat in unsafe and uncomfortable seating, while their Caucasian counterparts were seated in safe, clean and comfortable spaces. According to Henry Fireside’s article Separate and Unequal: Homer Plessy and the Supreme Court Decision that Legalized Racism, African American passengers were to sit in cars that had drunk and disorderly Caucasian individuals, and were often used for prison transport. Not all African Americans gave into these discriminations, in fact in 1892 a violation of the “Separate Car Act” took…

    • 895 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In college Annie embarks on the journey of becoming a civil rights activist. She was sick of living in Jim Crow society being controlled by racism and sexism. She became involved in civil rights organizations like the NAACP and CORE. She participates in sit-ins, rallies, and other forms of activism, but feels like the movement is not doing all that it can. The lynching of Emmett Till is particular really impacts young Annie.…

    • 254 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    "In this perilous world, if a black boy wanted to live a halfway normal life and die a natural death he had to learn early the art of how to get along with white folks. " These words were spoken by Benjamin Mays recalling his youth growing up in the South as an African American boy in the early 1900’s. Just because slavery ended after the Civil War didn’t mean that African Americans did not face oppression and discrimination. After the Civil War, the South still wanted to oppress African Americans, so they developed the Jim Crow Laws. The Jim Crow Laws were laws that discriminated against African Americans with concern to attendance in public schools and the use of facilities such as restaurants, theaters, hotels, cinemas and public baths.…

    • 888 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1945 through 1968 was a prominent period of time in United States history as it saw the rise of civil rights movements and an era of more progressive presidents. The federal government was partly in sync with the ideals of civil rights activists as both sides wanted the discriminated, which mostly included African Americans and women, to be officially recognized as equal and eliminate any segregation acts. While the government acted with a plan to gradually do so, activists wanted immediate change and took it upon themselves to do so through boycotts which some may or may not have been nonviolent protests. Documents 1, 5, and 7 relate to the roles the federal government has taken in the civil rights movement. Since President Harry S. Truman,…

    • 776 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jim Crow Laws

    • 655 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “In “Plessy v. Ferguson” (1896) the Supreme Court held that Jim Crow-type laws were constitutional as long as they allowed “separate but equal” facilities. The “separate but equal” requirement eventually led to widespread racial discrimination” (New World). This Supreme Court ruling made separation and segregation legal in the United States. “In 1890, Louisiana passed the "Separate Car Law," which purported to aid passenger comfort by creating "equal but separate" cars for blacks and whites. The Louisiana law made it illegal for blacks to sit in coach seats reserved for whites, and whites could not sit in seats reserved for blacks” (David Pilgrim).…

    • 655 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After civil war that blacks were promised freedom but a year from when civil war ended they were still in slavery still being a treated differently and wrong. What we did wrong was trust them to keep their promise. We didn't make sure that we had land to live on after we was free, we didn't have someone walking around making sure we all was free. We trusted and believed in the white man. “White Americans did not expect blacks to participate in Reconstruction-era debates.…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Supreme Court.” Key Excerpts from the Dissenting Opinion | www.Streetlaw.org, landmarkcases.org/en/Page/434/Key_Excerpts_from_the_Dissenting_Opinion. Paragraph 3). The Thirteenth Amendment abolished slavery, so if someone have property or if someone is in poverty this won’t affect their freedom. “The white race deems itself to be dominant race race in this country”(Landmark Cases of the U.S. Supreme Court.”…

    • 1548 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays