Current research trends applicate the (cyber)bully as the disruptive participant within social equity despite the mitigating factors which predicate his/her onset behaviour. A healthy child does not (cyber)bully. Pedagogical anti-bullying policy measures and frameworks are efficient in the attempted sterilization of (cyber)bullying cultures. Albeit, the effectiveness of such protocols and regulations dissipate within online realms; in such domains which may lack transparency, accountability, and recognizability. The efficacy of national education policy relies on its proponents to intuitively exercise on its behalf, that being, the efforts to manage (cyber)bullying have not substantiated a method of understanding the behaviour outside of its rhetorical contingencies. The (cyber)bully rationalized as a rhetorical mode of power has worked counterintuitive to his/her self-conceptualization as a functional metaphor: research trends obfuscate the mental health of the initiator, and its particular ramifications, that are negated in the pretense of upholding social codifications. Further intermediation focusing on initiator rehabilitation implementing the severity of academic repercussions, fails to recognize the child-bully dissociation and alienation from a child’s own intrinsic self-representation and self-determination. My aim is to articulate evidence-based research to pivot (cyber)bullying as
Current research trends applicate the (cyber)bully as the disruptive participant within social equity despite the mitigating factors which predicate his/her onset behaviour. A healthy child does not (cyber)bully. Pedagogical anti-bullying policy measures and frameworks are efficient in the attempted sterilization of (cyber)bullying cultures. Albeit, the effectiveness of such protocols and regulations dissipate within online realms; in such domains which may lack transparency, accountability, and recognizability. The efficacy of national education policy relies on its proponents to intuitively exercise on its behalf, that being, the efforts to manage (cyber)bullying have not substantiated a method of understanding the behaviour outside of its rhetorical contingencies. The (cyber)bully rationalized as a rhetorical mode of power has worked counterintuitive to his/her self-conceptualization as a functional metaphor: research trends obfuscate the mental health of the initiator, and its particular ramifications, that are negated in the pretense of upholding social codifications. Further intermediation focusing on initiator rehabilitation implementing the severity of academic repercussions, fails to recognize the child-bully dissociation and alienation from a child’s own intrinsic self-representation and self-determination. My aim is to articulate evidence-based research to pivot (cyber)bullying as