The statute for example two is operating a motor vehicle while under the influence. If an individual is caught and convicted of a DUI then there are a variety of consequences they may have to face. The first offence they must spend a year or 180 days in jail, then if they are convicted a second time they are sentenced to jail for a year, and finally if they are convicted a third time they must spend another year in jail and are considered a habitual offender. Even though they served time they also must pay fines, penalties, and their license will be suspended. …show more content…
Therefore, the defendant was operating the vehicle in the meaning of the statute because the vehicle doesn’t have to be in motion for the suspect to be operating it. In some states, you may even be breaking the law if you’re inside your car with the keys in your pocket. Or even laying down in the back seat with the keys in the ignition.
I believe they were in the meaning of the statute because as stated previously the car doesn’t have to be in motion. Even though I agree that they were in the statute I believe this law is kind of ridiculous. The reason why is because if an individual is drunk and knows not to drive home, so they decide to sleep in their car, however; they got cold and decided to turn on the car to put on the heater. While they were warming up a police officer stops to check on them and they are charged with a DUI even though they had no intention of driving while