Louis XIV: A Great Leader

Superior Essays
Louis XIV once said, “There is little that can withstand a man who can conquer himself”, (“Louis XIV Quotes.”). A leader is defined by the way their people see them. Someone who advances multiple aspects of their nation while supporting the thoughts and views of their people. A prime example of leadership and someone who is known to display these qualities is Julius Caesar. Julius Caesar's battle tactics are know to this day as historical. He was loved by his people, while staying organized and advancing the country of Rome. Louis relates to Caesar because of similar approaches to ruling the country and running the government. Although, Louis was not as kind as Caesar and was not supported by the entirety of the population, they both became …show more content…
He gained this knowledge by being tutored by his godfather Chief Minister Cardinal Jules Mazarin. The subjects Cardinal Jules Mazarin focused on mainly consisted to history, politics and the arts. Louis’s love for the arts derived from this education. Louis had a passion for the arts, literature, and fashion. His affection for these topics motivated him to make advancements in these areas. Which ultimately changed the culture of France. The way citizens looked, acted and learned was much different than before Louis’s term. His knowledge was useful in developing concepts to construct growth in not only culture, but also in the government and religion. By the age of twenty, Louis was ruling the country on his own with only his ideas to progress the nation. He was known for making quick, well-rounded decisions that many people in the government have never witnessed before. An example of Louis’s judgement having an effect on the government was that he made the decision to rule without a Chief Minister. When this decision was made the people of France were skeptical, they believed this was a selfish move on his part. The reasoning behind their thoughts was that he was not accepting help from others in the government, when it was available to him. Some citizens did not have the certainty Louis would be able to do it this job on his own. On the other hand, Louis knew his actions and ideas were strong enough to support and run …show more content…
He was a bit harsh to the people and bias towards himself. Although, he lacked some respectful characteristics, he did do a great deal for the community. While he was in reign positive changes in France were constructed, such as expanding the efficiency of the government and military, centralizing the country, tightening control of his nation and overall developing a united country. Louis XIV is remembered to this day as a memorable leader who impacted the history of France, and the world as a whole. Louis is known as a definition of leadership, despite the fact that his career did go through rough patches. In the end, France ended up with a new, improved country. Before Louis’s reign the government had little role in France and was created with little to no organization. While in reign, Louis XIV changed the government by reorganizing and reuniting. His most monumental achievement was creating unity in the country of France. Whether it was religion, government, society or military, the country was improved after Louis’s reign. Louis XIV relates to modern day presidents all throughout the world. Many of them have improved and advanced our everyday lives to create a better world for us as the population. Although, different aspects of the government and politics have changed over the years, many policies have stayed the same. Considering the fact that our government it is no longer a monarchy,

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    King Louis XVI - The Awful Leader King Louis XVI, born August 23, 1754, was the last King of France and he wasn't a particularly strong leader. Although he’s one of the most famous monarchs in the 18th century who went down in history, he miserably failed at his job. The kings before him, Louis XIV and Louis XV, put the country in debt and the unemployment dropped to 50%. He was a beloved king at the beginning of his reign, but as he made more decisions he slowly became a despised king. His people stormed the Bastille to show a defiance towards him, his family got charged with treason, and he was guillotined by his people on January 21, 1793.…

    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Louis Xiv Dbq Analysis

    • 353 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This left no room and power for the people of France to argue. Louis XIV controlled every aspect of the citizens lives, leaving the citizens with no power over the government and their decisions…

    • 353 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Louis XIV was one of the most memorable rules France has ever had, he was able to accomplish an absolutist rule with a bureaucracy and the development of mercantilism. Under the Rule of Anne, Louis XIV mother, France was in chaos. The opposition to his power had demanded the formation of a parliament and creation of national constitution. When Anne had refused revolt broke out across France.…

    • 854 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As a result of the Louis XIV’s totalitarian reign, France became a superpower and a cultural icon. The reign of Louis XIV brought a sort self-service and ambition, encouraging those within the court to climb the political ladder. Consequentially, many nobles would vie for the sovereign’s attention,…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The French Revolution had many causes for its occurrence including, but not limited to, their leader, unfair treatment of the estates, and poor living conditions of the lower class. This led the people to revolt and made life even more chaotic for the residents of France. Their government, an absolute monarchy, gave King Louis XVI the right to do whatever he wanted for the “well-being” of France. As explained in Document 1, “He ruled by the divine right theory which held that he had received his power to govern from God and was therefore responsible to God alone.” This means that the king had complete control over the power and finance of France and often used it to only benefit himself.…

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They both desired to limit their nobilities powers. Louis hated his nobility and tried to keep them out of his government. He required them to live at Versailles for part of the year so he could keep them distracted while he took on his affairs. He was able to collect taxes without the consent of the French Estates general, which was unheard of by any other ruler. Louis’s political structure was centralized absolutism, so he could handpick his desired ministers and limit the power of the nobility.…

    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Napoleon provided the French a monarchy that was more efficient and more powerful than any other. He did this because he believed that they needed some type of form of monarchy. When he was emperor he recreated a French “upper class.” While the emperor he continued to reward his commanders of the army with noble titles and estates.…

    • 58 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “I came, I saw, I conquered” (Julius Caesar).The sheer strength of a unified Rome and concurring land far east as the Asian Minor and as far south as Egypt, is the definition of power. Caesar was a conqueror ready to ally himself with his enemies and was ready to sacrifice anything for land and power. He was chased by Sullan out of Rome, but came back a Warrior and a Leader. He showed integrity and courage stated by Campbell’s Great Leaders Grow Deep Roots, with the actions he demonstrated on the battlefield and with his people. Caesar was a great leader with the experience of his life and choices he made to reach a greatness higher than anybody else.…

    • 1403 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    King Louis IV was not a popular person among the french people due to him throwing the country into bankruptcy and leaving the people of France unemployed and starving. Some notable leaders of the revolution were Napoleon Bonaparte, Lafayette, enlightenment thinker Rousseau and Montesquieu. The revolution was a success after the beheading of their former king and the newly made government worked to put the country back in order and soon going to war with Prussia and Austria. The french revolution influenced other european countries to abandon their monarchy and revolt against their…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Starvation portrayed a pivotal role in the rage of the 18th century French peasants in the novel, A Tale of Two Cities, by Charles Dickens. A lack of leadership and a poor economy can spark a distrust for any countries leaders, but when entire families are being eradicated by a serious aliment hatred will be felt. Starvation is a serious issue that can lead to various physical and psycho-social issues that can amplify feelings of rage. By the summer of 1789 France was in a grave financial crisis. The French monarch, Louis XVI, had taken the throne after his grandfather in 1774.…

    • 1232 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Conservatism In The 1800s

    • 1232 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Joseph was able to change people’s views on government from enlightenment to revolution for the power to get into government. If it was not for these three key things, France might not be the same…

    • 1232 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Absolutism is a political solution where the monarchy controls every facets of government with no checks or balances, it was initially introduced by the English by Kings, James and Charles I. Although it was introduced in the England (maybe Spain) it never did take hold mainly because of an established parliament that was so strongly ingrained into the English process of government. On the other hand, Louis XIV was able to secure an absolute monarchy and take it to extremes. He was able under the precept of “Divine Right” and claiming to be servant of God. This would allow Louis XIV to dissolve the Estates-General (a general assembly). Louis XIV is the poster child of what an absolute monarch is supposed to be and had no issue in letting the people of France know his status.…

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Julius Caesar transformed Rome from a growing empire into a mighty empire. Throughout many battles, many affairs and many risks, Caesar became one of the most feared leaders in history. He had other leaders running away from him or trying to take him down for many years, and no foreign leaders accomplished their goal. Caesar was not only strong in a military sense, he was one of the smartest leaders as well. Julius Caesar was a successful leader because he knew how to manage his power and popularity, he handled foreign policy very well, and he knew how to show his strengths.…

    • 2006 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    An absolute monarchy could only be successful under the leadership of an extraordinary ruler who had complete power over his people. An absolute monarch should be able to overachieve the abundance of obstacles placed in front of him. King Louis XIV was able to obtain much of his prodigious power by creating a new, modernized army. Louis was an exceptional mastermind at trade and he had dramatically increased France’s revenue. These actions allowed him to have the unique ability to create such a powerful army.…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The French Revolution led to the French monarchy being destroyed, the rise of Napoleon Bonaparte, armed conflicts with other European countries, and influence on other countries as well as other impacts across the globe. The French Revolution occurred under King Louis XVI, who was eventually executed. French society was dealing with high taxes and bad harvests which led them to dislike the government. They disliked the government because they were jealous of the privileges enjoyed by the…

    • 1579 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays