In four elections (2000, 1888, 1876, 1824), the Electoral College has elected a candidate different from the winner of the popular vote. How did this happen? Well, according to archives.gov, “There is no Constitutional provision or Federal law that requires Electors to vote according to the results of the popular vote in their States.” Some states have laws binding electors to the results of the popular vote, but in twenty-four states, such regulations are nonexistent.That means that even if a candidate wins the popular vote in the state, the Elector still has the freedom to cast a vote contradicting the wishes of the state’s population. This form of voting discredits individual opinions. The Electoral College system represents a small group of officials, not the wishes of our
In four elections (2000, 1888, 1876, 1824), the Electoral College has elected a candidate different from the winner of the popular vote. How did this happen? Well, according to archives.gov, “There is no Constitutional provision or Federal law that requires Electors to vote according to the results of the popular vote in their States.” Some states have laws binding electors to the results of the popular vote, but in twenty-four states, such regulations are nonexistent.That means that even if a candidate wins the popular vote in the state, the Elector still has the freedom to cast a vote contradicting the wishes of the state’s population. This form of voting discredits individual opinions. The Electoral College system represents a small group of officials, not the wishes of our