What Are The Benefits Of Plea Bargaining

Decent Essays
If plea bargaining is continually being used, It will empowers the criminals to bargain for a lighter punishment. It weakens the proposition that a criminal should receive punishment suited to the crime that they had done. Based on Penal Code, criminal should be given just punishment to give fair decision for both parties. The Penal Code has stated various crimes and its punishment done by the defendant for their wrongful acts. For example, if a prosecutor is going to let a defendant plead guilty for 3 years of rehab instead of taking the risk of 7 years, this will allow the defendant to escape full punishment. Furthermore, the defendant would know if they were brought up again to the court for the same crime, they would just hired a skilful

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Defense counsels started to feel that defendants will not be able to pay for the time involved to go to trial, but the prosecutors feel even though they work harder at a trial they are not having to decide on a sentence in a plea bargain. The judges now have the burden to determine and announce all sentences to defendants. The ban on plea bargaining did not affect the sentences of violent crime charges, but it did drastically change the sentences of Felony 3 guilty outcomes. The defendants convicted of burglary, larceny and destruction of property found themselves receiving longer sentences.…

    • 898 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Plea-bargaining is an important process in the criminal justice system and are used to prevent lengthy trials. It is defined as “the process of negotiating a guilty plea involving either charge bargaining, where the prosecutor will offer to reduce the severity of the charges or the number of counts in exchange for a guilty plea, or sentence bargaining, where the prosecutor will agree to recommend leniency at the sentencing stage” (Hemmens, Brody, & Spohn, 2013). However, there are both pros and cons with plea-bargaining. One reason why plea-bargaining is an advantage to the court system is because it helps to relieve caseloads since the prosecutor’s workload decreases when a defendant takes the bargain. Also, when a defendant goes this route,…

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    R Vs Nixon Essay

    • 1091 Words
    • 5 Pages

    On one hand, the plea agreement should be revoked before it was allowing a woman who willingly got behind the wheel intoxicated and killed two people to get off on an atrociously light sentence leading to the administration of justice being brought into disrepute. However, once the Crown has given a plea sentence, it seems unfair to simply take it back. The Crown had already received approval for the bargain and informed the defence and the accused of the bargain they were to receive. Plea bargains in themselves are an issue, Flynn states that there is a link between public confidence and transparency in plea bargaining. Furthermore, it was found that plea agreements are generally frowned upon by the public because it appears to benefit the offender at the expense of the victim (Flynn, 133).…

    • 1091 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Plea bargaining has many benefits which is why it is so common in the United States criminal justice…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Plea bargaining most often takes place before the beginning of a trial. It is the process by which the defendant and the prosecution work out a conclusion to the case, subject to court approval. For the prosecutor, the purpose of plea bargaining is to ensure a defendant gets punishment. For the defense, it is a way to get a lesser charge than if the case were to go to…

    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Plea Bargaining ought to be abolished in the United States criminal justice system. The reason for this is because it is unconstitutional, unethical, and immoral. Firstly, it is unconstitutional as it requires offenders to waive the rights guaranteed by the 5th and 6th amendments: the right to a jury trial, the right against self-incrimination, and the right to confront witnesses. Additionally, plea bargaining is unethical as it allows criminals to evade accepting responsibility for crimes they have committed.…

    • 269 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Plea Bargain Advantages

    • 2557 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Thus, it is imperative that all actors in the criminal justice and court systems use plea bargain correctly every time. Plea Bargains have changed the appearance of the criminal justice and court system over time. Having a fluid process for plea bargains has become vital in the criminal justice system. The use of a plea bargain will impact…

    • 2557 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Based on the aforementioned statements in this week’s assignment, I agree with the second statement regarding plea bargaining being right and proper. Like any tool utilized to find a solution, or to compromise, plea bargaining can be abused. A majority of the time I feel that plea bargaining is a great tool that allows for a reduction in the number of trails that judges oversee (Plea Bargaining, 2009). Moreover, I believe that our justice system is flooded and congested with pending trials and lacks the resources needed to pursue each trial with an equal amount of attention (Plea Bargain, 2009).…

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The use of coercion in plea bargains is constitutional according to the Supreme Court. Since plea-bargains for drug courts involve a greater need of coercion than normal court process due to the limited options available, it is considered a leveraging power to help drug users take advantage of the necessary treatment provided. However, the excessive use of coercion has led to many drug offenders entering treatment that are considered understaffed and over capacity (Parsons & Wei, 2015). The excessive use of coercion has also forced a drug courts to choice in behalf of the defendant, since the alternative is facing a jail sentence. Despite the concerns addressed, the courts when challenged of this claim find under the drug court setting that…

    • 1032 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Plea Bargaining Process

    • 212 Words
    • 1 Pages

    You succinctly described how the Plea and Plea Bargaining phase is an important but controversial part of the Juvenile Court Process. As you noted through your law enforcement experience, many see plea bargaining as a miscarriage of justice. While it does bring an otherwise weak case to some type of closure therefore ultimately saving the time of the court and money for the tax papers, it does not truly bring justice for the victim(s) or the community. “Counterarguments hold that plea bargaining with juveniles is an unregulated and unethical process” (Siegel & Welsh, 2014, p. 360). This is one of the many gray areas that the juvenile court system has as apposed to the adult system.…

    • 212 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Being in law enforcement for several years I come across several suspects and defendants who expresses the criminal justice process moves like a snail and is always unpredictable. Imagine if a significant amount of cases was going to trial instead of over 90% of felony cases are plea bargained (Bohm, R., Haley, K.,n.d). Nevertheless, there are three types of plea bargains and prosecutors tend to have factors to decide if the plea bargain is in the best interest or what’s the better plea bargain to make depending on the situation. The first example, a defendant might plead guilty to trespass and a misdemeanor vandalism charge instead of burglary charge because burglary carries felony charges.…

    • 344 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Around 95 percent of cases are plea bargained. Without plea bargaining, the court system would be drowning in cases and the right to a speedy trial under the 6th amendment would be virtually impossible. The court system in the United States is already overloaded with cases waiting to be heard, and the added cases resulting in the elimination of plea bargaining would be catastrophic for the criminal justice system. What plea bargaining does is allow the prosecutor to offer a lesser charge and, in turn, the defendant waives their right to a trial. It allows the court system to move along faster and deal with the offenders who commit more serious, heinous crimes.…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The advent of plea bargaining in the legal system in the past century has rendered the classic "trial" virtually obsolete. Plea bargaining1 is a crucial feature of our criminal justice system, as approximately 95% of convictions that occur within a year of arrest are obtained by a guilty plea. For at least a century, the institution of plea bargaining' has been a central feature of the American system of criminal justice. In September 203, the Justice Department again revised its guidelines regarding plea bargains. Lawyers and non-lawyers alike have generally assumed that the reason for this is the enormous size of the case load in relation to the available legal personnel.…

    • 1547 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The insanity plea is a defense in the court of law put in place for people who suffer from mental illness and commit crimes. Under this defense, the mentally ill are not entirely held responsible for their actions given the terms that they were not in the correct state of mind when the crime took place. The person would admit to committing the crime, but then say they are not guilty by reason of insanity (Francone). This plea has been used in my cases throughout history.…

    • 1321 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It takes the power away from judges, muzzling their ability to evaluate both the motives and the needs of a particular defendant. This practice leads to inequity and sentencing which is disproportionate to the crime committed. Aristotle says, “In cases that the issue happens to fall outside the universal formula, it is correct to rectify the shortcoming.” We need to do something about our inequity problem. We need to abolish minimum sentencing laws and instead follow Aristotle’s maxim that judges are to be the most virtuous among us.…

    • 872 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays